-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: suport definePage #183
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes include significant updates to documentation, the addition of new dependencies, and enhancements to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant VitePluginUniPages
participant SFCParser
participant MacroHandler
User->>VitePluginUniPages: Define SFC
VitePluginUniPages->>SFCParser: Parse SFC
SFCParser->>MacroHandler: Find macros
MacroHandler-->>VitePluginUniPages: Return macro data
VitePluginUniPages-->>User: Processed SFC
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/core/package.json (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/constant.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/core/src/context.ts (5 hunks)
- packages/core/src/customBlock.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/definePage.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/core/src/index.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/core/src/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/core/src/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/playground/src/pages/test-define-page.vue (1 hunks)
- test/parser.spec.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/core/src/constant.ts
Additional comments not posted (20)
packages/playground/src/pages/test-define-page.vue (2)
14-16
: LGTM!The template section is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
1-10
: LGTM! But verify the usage ofdefinePage
.The script setup section is correctly implemented. However, ensure that the
definePage
function is used correctly and that the properties are valid.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the usage of
definePage
:Verification successful
Usage of
definePage
is correct.The
definePage
function is used to define route data at compile time, as described in the documentation. The current implementation intest-define-page.vue
aligns with the intended usage. No issues found.
- Reference:
README.md
explains the compile-time usage ofdefinePage
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `definePage`. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct usage. rg --type ts -A 5 $'definePage'Length of output: 1452
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for additional references or documentation for `definePage`. # Search for any documentation or comments related to `definePage`. rg 'definePage' --type md -A 5 # Search for any additional references to `definePage` in the codebase. rg 'definePage' --type ts -A 5Length of output: 1831
test/parser.spec.ts (3)
2-4
: LGTM!The import statement has been correctly updated to include
parseSFC
.The code changes are approved.
13-15
: LGTM!The test case is correctly implemented. The addition of
parseSFC
enhances the flexibility and correctness of the SFC handling.The code changes are approved.
37-39
: LGTM!The test case is correctly implemented. The addition of
parseSFC
enhances the flexibility and correctness of the SFC handling.The code changes are approved.
packages/core/package.json (4)
58-58
: LGTM!The addition of
@babel/generator
is appropriate for facilitating code generation within the Babel ecosystem.The code changes are approved.
59-59
: LGTM!The addition of
@babel/types
is appropriate for facilitating code manipulation within the Babel ecosystem.The code changes are approved.
61-61
: LGTM!The addition of
@vue-macros/common
is appropriate for enhancing the handling of Vue macros.The code changes are approved.
76-76
: LGTM!The addition of
@types/babel__generator
is appropriate for improving TypeScript support for the Babel generator.The code changes are approved.
packages/core/src/customBlock.ts (1)
74-75
: LGTM!The function changes improve efficiency by eliminating the need to read and parse the file content. The function now directly accesses the
customBlocks
property, which simplifies the logic.The code changes are approved.
packages/core/src/definePage.ts (1)
85-87
: LGTM!The function is well-implemented and reuses the
findMacroWithImports
function.The code changes are approved.
packages/core/src/utils.ts (3)
64-73
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function is correctly implemented. However, ensure that all function calls to
parseData
match the new signature.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function usage verified successfully.
The
parseData
function is used correctly with the updated signature in the following files:
packages/core/src/utils.ts
packages/core/src/context.ts
All instances match the new function signature with three parameters. No further action is needed.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `parseData` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type js -A 5 $'parseData'Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `parseData` across the entire codebase, including TypeScript files. # Test: Search for the function usage in all relevant files. rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts -A 5 $'parseData'Length of output: 1882
82-87
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function is correctly implemented. However, ensure that all function calls to
hasChanged
match the new signature.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function
hasChanged
is used correctly with the new signature.The function
hasChanged
is correctly implemented and used in the codebase with the updated parameters. No issues were found with its usage.
- Verified in
packages/core/src/context.ts
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `hasChanged` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type js -A 5 $'hasChanged'Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the `hasChanged` function to ensure it's correctly identified. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function hasChanged($_, $_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for all occurrences of `hasChanged` to verify its usage in the codebase. rg 'hasChanged' -A 5Length of output: 2483
76-79
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function is correctly implemented. However, ensure that all function calls to
setCache
match the new signature.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
README.md (1)
57-70
: LGTM!The documentation changes are correctly implemented and improve the clarity and structure of the content.
The code changes are approved.
packages/core/src/index.ts (1)
96-101
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function is correctly implemented. However, ensure that the new functionality related to
parseSFC
andfindMacro
is used correctly.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function usage verified successfully. The functions
parseSFC
andfindMacro
are correctly used across the codebase. No issues were found with their integration.
parseSFC
is used inpackages/core/src/index.ts
,packages/core/src/context.ts
, andtest/parser.spec.ts
.findMacro
is used inpackages/core/src/index.ts
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `parseSFC` and `findMacro` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new functionality. rg --type js -A 5 $'parseSFC' rg --type js -A 5 $'findMacro'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definitions of `parseSFC` and `findMacro` to understand their implementations. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function parseSFC($_) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function findMacro($_) { $$$ }' # Search for the usage of `parseSFC` and `findMacro` in TypeScript files. rg --type ts -A 5 'parseSFC' rg --type ts -A 5 'findMacro'Length of output: 5432
packages/core/src/context.ts (4)
3-3
: LGTM!The new imports are necessary for the new functionality.
The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 19-19
234-234
: LGTM!The method simplifies the code by removing an unnecessary intermediate variable.
The code changes are approved.
267-269
: LGTM!The method enhances the change detection mechanism by considering the content of the SFC.
The code changes are approved.
176-179
: LGTM! But verify error handling inparseSFC
andparseData
.The method correctly integrates file reading and metadata processing. Ensure that
parseSFC
andparseData
handle errors gracefully.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify error handling in
parseSFC
andparseData
:
export function definePage(_options: Partial< | ||
PageMetaDatum | ||
>) { | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implement the function to handle page metadata.
The function is a placeholder and does not perform any operations. It should be implemented to handle page metadata.
Apply this diff to implement the function:
export function definePage(_options: Partial<
PageMetaDatum
>) {
+ // Implement the function to handle page metadata
+ // Example implementation:
+ const pageMeta: PageMetaDatum = {
+ path: _options.path || '',
+ type: _options.type,
+ style: _options.style,
+ needLogin: _options.needLogin,
+ ..._options,
+ }
+ return pageMeta
}
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/core/src/definePage.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/core/src/definePage.ts
Description 描述
feat: suport definePage
支持definePage定义路由信息
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
definePage
function for flexible page metadata handling.definePage
function.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores