Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2024. It is now read-only.

Upgrade TypeScript from 3.2.2 to 3.6.4 #7

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

OliverJAsh
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@OliverJAsh OliverJAsh force-pushed the maintenance/upgrade-ts branch from c8e8352 to 2440cce Compare October 18, 2019 15:12
const pickTrueInObject = <K extends string>(
obj: Partial<Record<K, boolean>>,
): Partial<Record<K, true>> =>
pickBy(obj as Record<K, boolean>, (_key, value): value is true => value);
Copy link
Member Author

@OliverJAsh OliverJAsh Oct 18, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit stuck here.

pickTrueInObject must be allowed to receive partials. But if we update this function, we have to update every helper it uses internally (pickBy and entries) to also allow Partial. That feels wrong :-/

@karol-majewski Any thoughts on what we should do here?

Complete example:

const keys = <O extends object>(obj: O) =>
    Object.keys(obj) as Array<keyof O>;

const entries = <K extends string, V>(obj: Record<K, V>) =>
    keys(obj).map(key => [key, obj[key]] as const);

const fromEntries = <K extends string, V>(arr: Array<[K, V]>) =>
    Object.assign({}, ...arr.map(([k, v]) => ({ [k]: v }))) as Record<K, V>;

const pickBy = <K extends string, V, Result extends V>(
    obj: Record<K, V>,
    predicate: (key: K, value: V) => value is Result,
) =>
    fromEntries(
        entries(obj).filter((entry): entry is [K, Result] => {
            const [key, value] = entry;
            return predicate(key, value);
        }),
    );

const pickTrueInObject = <K extends string>(
    obj: Record<K, boolean>,
): Partial<Record<K, true>> =>
    pickBy(obj, (_key, value): value is true => value);

declare const record: Partial<Record<'foo' | 'bar', boolean>>;
// declare const record: Record<'foo' | 'bar', boolean>;

pickTrueInObject(record); // error

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@karol-majewski Hey, do you have any thoughts on the above?

Copy link

@karol-majewski karol-majewski Nov 13, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the T passed to pickTrueInObject is a Dictionary<boolean>, isn't it sufficient to say pickTrueInObject will return a Partial<T>?

Sure, the signature could be more precise:

declare function pickTrueInObject<T extends object>(source: T): Partial<Record<PropertyOfValue<T, boolean>, true>>;

type PropertyOfValue<T, V> = {
    [K in keyof T]: T[K] extends V
      ? K
      : never
  }[keyof T];


declare const foo: {
  foo: number;
  bar: boolean;
}

let result = pickTrueInObject(foo); // { bar?: true }

but since we're not dealing with object literals, we cannot use the type system to tell us which properties will be true in runtime and that renders having this extra information useless.

Copy link

@karol-majewski karol-majewski Nov 13, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to pipe well.

import { pipe } from 'pipe-ts';

declare function pickTrueInObject<T extends object>(source: T): Partial<Record<PropertyOfValue<T, boolean>, true>>;

type PropertyOfValue<T, V> = {
    [K in keyof T]: T[K] extends V
      ? K
      : never
  }[keyof T];


declare const foo: {
  foo: number;
  bar: boolean;
}

const UNSAFE_keys = <T extends object>(source: T) =>
  Object.keys(source) as (keyof T)[];

const keys = pipe(pickTrueInObject, UNSAFE_keys)(foo); // "bar"[]

@OliverJAsh OliverJAsh mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2019
@OliverJAsh OliverJAsh changed the title Uprade TypeScript from 3.2.2 to 3.6.4 Upgrade TypeScript from 3.2.2 to 3.6.4 Nov 18, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants