df: switch from u64 to u128 to handle fs with large inodes nr #6071
55.88% of diff hit (target 87.55%)
View this Pull Request on Codecov
55.88% of diff hit (target 87.55%)
Annotations
Check warning on line 28 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L28
Added line #L28 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 65 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L65
Added line #L65 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 68 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L68
Added line #L68 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 71 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L71
Added line #L71 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 105 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L104-L105
Added lines #L104 - L105 were not covered by tests
Check warning on line 110 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 116 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L116
Added line #L116 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 268 in src/uu/df/src/table.rs
codecov / codecov/patch
src/uu/df/src/table.rs#L268
Added line #L268 was not covered by tests