Update test broken macros

[SergeyKopienko]

No description provided.

[SergeyKopienko]

@danhoeflinger , should we replace the rest of _PSTL_TEST_COMPARISON_BROKEN usages like I already made in this PR?
Were these error fixed?

[danhoeflinger]

@danhoeflinger , should we replace the rest of _PSTL_TEST_COMPARISON_BROKEN usages like I already made in this PR? Were these error fixed?

I think it is fixed, it is on my TODO list to confirm that, thanks for the reminder.

[SergeyKopienko]

@danhoeflinger, @mmichel11 the next question about the usage of _PSTL_TEST_LATEST_INTEL_LLVM_COMPILER in _PSTL_RED_BY_SEG_WINDOWS_COMPILE_ORDER_BROKEN definition: has it been fixed too?

// A specific kernel compilation order causes incorrect results on Windows with the DPCPP backend. For now, we reorder
// the test while the issue is being reported to the compiler team. Once it is resolved, this macro can be removed
// or limited to older compiler versions.
#define _PSTL_RED_BY_SEG_WINDOWS_COMPILE_ORDER_BROKEN                                                                  \
    (_MSC_VER && TEST_DPCPP_BACKEND_PRESENT && __INTEL_LLVM_COMPILER <= _PSTL_TEST_LATEST_INTEL_LLVM_COMPILER)

[SergeyKopienko]

This fix already prepared by @dmitriy-sobolev in the PR #2000

[mmichel11]

@danhoeflinger, @mmichel11 the next question about the usage of _PSTL_TEST_LATEST_INTEL_LLVM_COMPILER in _PSTL_RED_BY_SEG_WINDOWS_COMPILE_ORDER_BROKEN definition: has it been fixed too?

// A specific kernel compilation order causes incorrect results on Windows with the DPCPP backend. For now, we reorder
// the test while the issue is being reported to the compiler team. Once it is resolved, this macro can be removed
// or limited to older compiler versions.
#define _PSTL_RED_BY_SEG_WINDOWS_COMPILE_ORDER_BROKEN                                                                  \
    (_MSC_VER && TEST_DPCPP_BACKEND_PRESENT && __INTEL_LLVM_COMPILER <= _PSTL_TEST_LATEST_INTEL_LLVM_COMPILER)

I tested and it's fixed, so the approach in the new PR is correct.