Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: build error #5199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

fix: build error #5199

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

anncwb
Copy link
Collaborator

@anncwb anncwb commented Dec 20, 2024

Description

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Checklist

ℹ️ Check all checkboxes - this will indicate that you have done everything in accordance with the rules in CONTRIBUTING.

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs:dev command.
  • Run the tests with pnpm test.
  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a specific version of the esbuild package for improved compatibility.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated various dependencies to their latest versions, enhancing stability and performance.

This release focuses on dependency management to ensure a smoother user experience.

@anncwb anncwb added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 20, 2024
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 20, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 826a4e9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request involves routine dependency management across two configuration files. The package.json file was updated to add an esbuild override at version 0.24.0, while the pnpm-workspace.yaml file received multiple minor version updates for various dependencies. These changes represent standard maintenance to keep project dependencies current and consistent, with updates ranging from development tools like ESLint and TypeScript to UI libraries and build utilities.

Changes

File Changes
package.json Added "esbuild": "0.24.0" in pnpm overrides section
pnpm-workspace.yaml Updated 32 dependency versions, including minor increments for @changesets/cli, @clack/prompts, eslint, vite, and many others

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • vince292007

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, dependencies dance!
Versions bumped with rabbit's glance
Esbuild pinned, configs bright
Workspace humming with delight
Code's garden grows, neat and clean! 🌱


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a66082 and 826a4e9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • pnpm-workspace.yaml (8 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • package.json
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (5)

87-87: UI framework updates look safe

The updates to UI frameworks are minor:

  • element-plus: 2.9.0 → 2.9.1
  • naive-ui: 2.40.3 → 2.40.4

These patch version updates typically contain bug fixes and are generally safe to apply.

Also applies to: 121-121


53-54: Development tooling updates

The updates to development tools (ESLint, TypeScript-ESLint, Stylelint) are non-critical as they don't affect runtime behavior:

  • @typescript-eslint/* : 8.18.0 → 8.18.1
  • eslint: 9.16.0 → 9.17.0
  • stylelint: 16.11.0 → 16.12.0

Also applies to: 88-88, 146-146


164-164: Verify if Vite update resolves the build error

The update to Vite from 6.0.3 to 6.0.5 might be related to the build error mentioned in the PR objectives. This is a minor version update that typically includes bug fixes.

✅ Verification successful

Vite update addresses esbuild regression

The update to Vite 6.0.5 specifically fixes an esbuild regression by pinning esbuild to version 0.24.0 (PR #19027). This is directly relevant to build stability and likely addresses the build error mentioned in the PR objectives.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the changelog for any build-related fixes
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vitejs/vite/main/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 "6.0.5"

Length of output: 3619


161-161: Verify unbuild version stability

The update from unbuild rc version (3.0.0-rc.11) to stable version (3.0.1) is significant as it moves from a release candidate to a stable release.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the usage of unbuild in the codebase to understand the impact of this version change.

This will help us understand:

  1. How unbuild is configured across the project
  2. If there are any version constraints in individual packages that might conflict
  3. The actual usage patterns to assess if the fix in v3.0.1 (de-defaulting default exports in stubs) affects our codebase

Based on the analysis of the codebase and the changelog, I can now provide a final response:

Upgrade to unbuild v3.0.1 is safe to proceed

The change from unbuild v3.0.0-rc.11 to v3.0.1 only includes a fix for de-defaulting default exports from stubs. After analyzing the build configurations across the project:

  • All packages use basic unbuild configuration with clean, declaration, and entries
  • No package relies on complex stub handling or default exports manipulation
  • The fix in v3.0.1 for stub generation won't impact the current build setup
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for unbuild configuration and usage
rg -l "unbuild"

# Check the changelog for breaking changes
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/unjs/unbuild/main/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 "3.0.1"

Length of output: 2851


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check build.config.ts files for unbuild configuration
fd 'build.config.ts$' --exec cat {} \;

# Check package.json files for unbuild version constraints
fd 'package.json$' --exec grep -l "unbuild" {} \; | xargs cat

Length of output: 28964


179-180: Significant version jumps require testing

The updates to vxe-pc-ui (4.3.27 → 4.3.40) and vxe-table (4.9.23 → 4.9.33) represent larger version jumps that could introduce breaking changes or affect existing functionality.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@anncwb anncwb merged commit 24a4935 into main Dec 20, 2024
14 checks passed
@anncwb anncwb deleted the bugfix/5194 branch December 20, 2024 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant