Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test cases for INTMIN/-1 #733

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Add test cases for INTMIN/-1 #733

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

dthaler
Copy link
Contributor

@dthaler dthaler commented Oct 16, 2024

Updates bpf_conformance to latest and adds the new test cases to the test pass

Fixes #677

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced several new conformance test cases to improve coverage of edge cases in integer operations, including multiplication, negation, division, and modulo.
  • Chores

    • Updated the subproject commit reference for better alignment with the latest developments.

Fixes vbpf#677

Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <[email protected]>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the commit reference for the external/bpf_conformance subproject and adding multiple new conformance test cases in src/test/test_conformance.cpp. These tests focus on edge cases in integer operations, specifically multiplication, negation, division, and modulo, with various scenarios including the handling of INT64_MIN.

Changes

Files Change Summary
external/bpf_conformance Updated subproject commit reference from e149d36431a7ea6f982e4d409d41748d82a3b56e to e80df9982518c0ea41c939b561b06daa1bfce313.
src/test/test_conformance.cpp Added new conformance test cases for integer operations, covering multiplication, negation, division, and modulo with edge cases.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add test cases to see how verifier handles -INT64_MIN (#677)

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
New tests hop in, brightening the day.
With edge cases covered, we leap with glee,
Multiplying joy, as far as we see!
Negation and division, all in a row,
Our conformance tests help the logic to grow! 🐇✨

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3656437 and d86db67.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • external/bpf_conformance (1 hunks)
  • src/test/test_conformance.cpp (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
external/bpf_conformance (1)

1-1: LGTM: Subproject commit update approved.

The update of the bpf_conformance framework to the latest version (commit e80df9982518c0ea41c939b561b06daa1bfce313) aligns with the PR objectives. This change should incorporate the latest improvements and possibly new test cases for the verifier.

To ensure the update includes the expected changes, please verify the following:

  1. The changes introduced in the new commit of bpf_conformance framework.
  2. Any new test cases or modifications related to handling INT64_MIN and its expressions.

You can use the following commands to inspect the changes:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify changes in the bpf_conformance submodule

# Navigate to the submodule directory
cd external/bpf_conformance

# Show the commit message and changes introduced in the new commit
git log -1 --pretty=full e80df9982518c0ea41c939b561b06daa1bfce313
git show e80df9982518c0ea41c939b561b06daa1bfce313 --name-status

# Search for any new or modified test cases related to INT64_MIN
git show e80df9982518c0ea41c939b561b06daa1bfce313 | grep -i "int64_min"

This will help ensure that the update includes the necessary changes to address the PR objectives and the linked issue #677.

src/test/test_conformance.cpp (2)

200-201: Excellent addition of multiplication test cases for INT64_MIN

These new test cases for multiplication operations involving INT64_MIN and -1 are crucial additions that directly address the PR objectives. They cover both 32-bit and 64-bit scenarios, as well as immediate and register-based operations. This comprehensive approach will help identify potential issues with integer overflow or unexpected behavior in these edge cases.

Also applies to: 205-206


Line range hint 200-250: Comprehensive enhancement of the conformance testing framework

The additions to the test_conformance.cpp file significantly enhance the robustness of the BPF conformance testing framework. The new test cases effectively address the PR objectives and the concerns raised in the linked issue #677. By including comprehensive tests for multiplication, negation, division, and modulo operations involving INT64_MIN and related expressions, this update ensures that the verifier's behavior is thoroughly evaluated for these edge cases.

The consistent approach of testing both 32-bit and 64-bit scenarios, as well as immediate and register-based operations, provides a solid foundation for identifying potential issues related to integer overflow, undefined behavior, and unexpected results in these critical edge cases.

These changes will greatly contribute to improving the overall reliability and accuracy of the verifier in handling extreme integer values, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity and security of BPF programs.

src/test/test_conformance.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/test_conformance.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/test_conformance.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 90.329% (+0.02%) from 90.312%
when pulling d86db67 on dthaler:neg-one
into 3656437 on vbpf:main.

@elazarg elazarg merged commit 6ea08e0 into vbpf:main Oct 17, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add test cases to see how verifier handles -INT64_MIN
3 participants