Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use macos-latest #690

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from
Closed

Use macos-latest #690

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

victimsnino
Copy link
Owner

@victimsnino victimsnino commented Nov 28, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CI workflows to use the latest macOS environment for improved compatibility and support.
    • Enhanced caching mechanism in CI workflows to improve cache restoration accuracy by introducing a new environment variable, CACHE_INDEX.
    • Reformatted cache keys for better specificity in dependency management across various jobs.
  • New Features
    • Added an option to enable Qt support in the build configuration, allowing for greater flexibility in project setup.
    • Introduced a new option for including Qt support in the Conan package management system, enhancing integration capabilities.
    • Expanded Qt library dependencies in the build process to ensure necessary components are included.
    • Simplified post-build commands for Qt components to streamline the build process.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes made in the CI workflow configuration involve the introduction of an environment variable CACHE_INDEX set to 2, along with updates to the macOS version used for job executions. The ci-macos job's operating system attribute has been changed from macos-12 to macos-latest across the cache_deps, tests, and sanitize jobs. Cache keys have been modified to incorporate the new variable, and the cache restoration strategy has been refined in the analyzers.yml workflow by removing the restore-keys section. Additionally, options for enabling Qt support have been added in the CMake and Conan configurations.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml Updated ci-macos job's os attribute from macos-12 to macos-latest. Introduced environment variable CACHE_INDEX: 2. Modified cache key and restore keys in cache_deps, tests, and sanitize jobs to include CACHE_INDEX.
.github/workflows/analyzers.yml Introduced environment variable CACHE_INDEX: 2. Updated cache keys in pvs and sonarcloud_and_coverage jobs to include CACHE_INDEX. Removed restore-keys section from both jobs.
cmake/variables.cmake Added option RPP_BUILD_QT_CODE to enable Qt support in the build configuration.
conanfile.py Introduced new option "with_qt" for optional Qt support in the RppConan class, with default set to False.
cmake/dependencies.cmake Updated macros to include additional Qt components for Core and Gui in library fetching.

Possibly related PRs

  • try to speedup cache #663: The changes in this PR enhance the caching mechanism in the CI workflow, which is directly related to the modifications made in the main PR regarding cache key updates and the introduction of the CACHE_INDEX environment variable.
  • Add benchmarks #687: This PR introduces new benchmarks and modifies the CI workflow, which is relevant as the main PR also updates the CI workflow configuration, particularly in the context of caching and job definitions.

🐇 "In the land of code where the rabbits play,
We’ve updated our macOS, hip-hip-hooray!
From twelve to the latest, we leap with delight,
Our CI now dances in the bright, shining light!
With hops and with skips, our tests will now run,
On the freshest of platforms, oh what fun!" 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4a01e4 and 6b6ccbb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (1)

27-27: Document runner version strategy in workflow

Consider adding a comment in the workflow file documenting the runner version strategy and the rationale for using macos-latest. This will help future maintainers understand the decision and manage version-related issues effectively.

Add a comment like this at the top of the file:

 name: CI v2
+# Runner Version Strategy:
+# - Using macos-latest to automatically stay on supported versions
+# - Monitor runner deprecation announcements: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues

Also applies to: 140-140

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between db32585 and 6d3ded2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (2)

140-140: Ensure cache compatibility across macOS versions

The change to macos-latest in the tests job should be compatible with the cached dependencies. Monitor the cache hit rates and build times to ensure there are no negative impacts from version mismatches.

✅ Verification successful

After analyzing the workflow file, I can provide the final response:

Cache configuration is properly handled for macOS

The cache configuration in the workflow is well-designed and compatible with macOS version changes:

  • The cache key includes the OS-specific name (ci-macos), build type, and content hashes of conanfile.py and CMakePresets.json
  • The cache paths correctly include both ~/.conan2 and /Users/runner/.conan2/
  • The restore-keys fallback is properly configured
  • The cache is used consistently across both the cache_deps and tests jobs
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any cache-related issues in recent workflow runs
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "victimsnino", name: "reactive-pp") {
    workflowRuns(first: 10, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
      nodes {
        workflow {
          name
        }
        jobs(first: 10) {
          nodes {
            name
            steps(first: 20) {
              nodes {
                name
                conclusion
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 770


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the cache configuration in the workflow file and any related cache settings
cat .github/workflows/ci\ v2.yml

Length of output: 8396


27-27: Consider the trade-offs of using macos-latest

While using macos-latest ensures you're always on a supported runner version, it may impact build reproducibility as the runner version can change automatically. Consider documenting this decision and monitoring for potential issues during version transitions.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the macOS runner configuration and its potential impact.


Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough context about the macOS runner usage in the workflow:

Switching to macos-latest is a reasonable choice

The change from macos-12 to macos-latest appears safe for this workflow because:

  • The macOS runner is used in standard ways for caching dependencies and running tests
  • No macOS-specific conditional logic or special handling was found
  • The workflow doesn't rely on version-specific macOS features

The automatic version updates from macos-latest should not impact the build stability as the workflow uses standard CI operations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check current macos-latest version and upcoming deprecations
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  -H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
  /repos/actions/runner-images/contents/images/macos/macos-latest.md | jq -r '.content' | base64 -d

# Check if there are any existing issues related to macos runner version
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  search(query: "repo:victimsnino/reactive-pp is:issue macos runner", type: ISSUE, first: 5) {
    nodes {
      ... on Issue {
        title
        url
        state
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 557


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the workflow file for any specific macOS dependencies or configurations
rg -A 5 "macos" .github/workflows/ci\ v2.yml

# Check if there are any macOS-specific build or test configurations
rg -l "darwin|macos|osx" --type yaml

# Look for any conditional logic based on runner OS
rg "if: runner.os == 'macOS'" --type yaml

Length of output: 734

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/analyzers.yml (1)

113-114: LGTM! Consider matching cache fallback strategy.

The multi-line YAML format is correct, but for consistency and better cache utilization, consider matching the fallback strategy suggested for the pvs job.

Consider expanding the restore-keys:

           restore-keys: |
             deps-ci-ubuntu-clang-Release-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}
+            deps-ci-ubuntu-clang-Release-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-
+            deps-ci-ubuntu-clang-Release-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7dea5a and 5dffe94.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml

55-55: undefined variable "CACHE_INDEX". available variables are "env", "github", "inputs", "job", "matrix", "needs", "runner", "secrets", "steps", "strategy", "vars"

(expression)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/analyzers.yml (1)

41-41: Verify cache key structure and fallback strategy.

The cache key now includes hashes of both dependency files, which improves specificity but might reduce cache hits. Consider adding fallback keys for partial matches.

Consider adding additional restore-keys for better cache utilization:

-          restore-keys: deps-ci-ubuntu-clang-Release-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}
+          restore-keys: |
+            deps-ci-ubuntu-clang-Release-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}
+            deps-ci-ubuntu-clang-Release-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-
+            deps-ci-ubuntu-clang-Release-

This provides a fallback strategy when exact matches aren't found.

.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (2)

114-114: LGTM! Cache configuration improvements

The changes to cache keys and restore-keys are well thought out:

  1. Including dependency file hashes ensures cache accuracy
  2. Consistent pattern across jobs improves maintainability
  3. Cache index allows for controlled cache invalidation when needed

Also applies to: 191-191


29-29: Consider documenting macOS version requirements

While using macos-latest reduces maintenance overhead, it may introduce unexpected behavior when the runner version changes. Consider:

  1. Documenting minimum macOS version requirements
  2. Adding CI checks to verify compatibility across different macOS versions

Run this script to check the current macOS version and available runners:

Also applies to: 140-140

✅ Verification successful

Using macos-latest is appropriate for this project

Based on the codebase analysis, using macos-latest is suitable because:

  1. The project already handles cross-platform compatibility through CMake configurations
  2. No strict macOS version requirements are specified in the codebase
  3. The only macOS-specific requirement mentioned in Readme.md is "Apple Clang 14", which is available across recent macOS versions

The change from macos-12 to macos-latest is safe and reduces maintenance overhead without introducing significant risks.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check current macOS version and available runners

# Get current macOS version from latest runner
gh api repos/actions/runner-images/contents/images/macos/macos-latest.json | jq -r '.content' | base64 -d | jq -r '.os_version'

Length of output: 247


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any specific macOS version requirements or dependencies in the codebase

# Search for macOS version related patterns in the codebase
rg -i "macos|darwin" -g "!{.git,node_modules}" -A 2

# Look for any package.json or similar configuration files that might specify OS requirements
fd "package.json|requirements.txt|Cargo.toml|*.podspec" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 2722

Comment on lines 19 to 20
env:
CACHE_INDEX: 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix environment variable reference syntax

The CACHE_INDEX environment variable is incorrectly referenced in the cache key. GitHub Actions requires environment variables to be accessed through the env context.

Apply this change to fix the syntax:

- key: deps-${{ matrix.config.name }}-${{ matrix.build_type.config }}-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}-${{CACHE_INDEX}}
+ key: deps-${{ matrix.config.name }}-${{ matrix.build_type.config }}-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}-${{ env.CACHE_INDEX }}

Also applies to: 55-55

@victimsnino victimsnino marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2024 20:44
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (1)

29-29: Consider implications of using macos-latest

While using macos-latest keeps the runner up-to-date, it might introduce unexpected behavior when GitHub updates the macOS version. Consider:

  1. Documenting the minimum required macOS version
  2. Testing the workflow when GitHub announces new macOS images

Also applies to: 142-142

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32fd6a9 and a1eaa00.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml (5 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (2)

55-55: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix environment variable reference syntax in cache keys

The CACHE_INDEX environment variable is incorrectly referenced in the cache keys. GitHub Actions requires environment variables to be accessed through the env context.

Apply this change to all cache keys:

-key: deps-${{ matrix.config.name }}-${{ matrix.build_type.config }}-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}-${{CACHE_INDEX}}
+key: deps-${{ matrix.config.name }}-${{ matrix.build_type.config }}-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}-${{ env.CACHE_INDEX }}

Also applies to: 116-116, 194-194


19-20: Ensure consistent environment variable syntax usage

The environment variable declaration is correct, but ensure it's consistently referenced using ${{ env.CACHE_INDEX }} syntax throughout the workflow.

✅ Verification successful

Environment variable syntax is correctly used throughout the workflow

The environment variable CACHE_INDEX is properly referenced using the correct syntax ${{env.CACHE_INDEX}} consistently across all its usages in cache keys and cache-key-prefix configurations. No syntax issues were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for incorrect env var references
rg -l '\$\{\{CACHE_INDEX\}\}' || rg -l '\$CACHE_INDEX'

Length of output: 55


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for all references to CACHE_INDEX in the workflow file
rg -A 2 -B 2 'CACHE_INDEX' '.github/workflows/ci v2.yml'

Length of output: 1304

lookup-only: true

- name: Install Qt
if: steps.check_cache.outputs.cache-hit != 'true' || github.event_name == 'schedule'
uses: jurplel/install-qt-action@v4
with:
cache: true
cache-key-prefix: ${{env.CACHE_INDEX}}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix environment variable reference syntax in cache key prefixes

The CACHE_INDEX environment variable is incorrectly referenced in the Qt installation cache key prefixes.

Apply this change to all Qt installation steps:

-cache-key-prefix: ${{CACHE_INDEX}}
+cache-key-prefix: ${{ env.CACHE_INDEX }}

Also applies to: 105-105, 183-183, 263-263

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1eaa00 and 5d03d0b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml (5 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (3)

19-20: LGTM: Good cache versioning strategy

Adding a cache version index is a good practice to invalidate old caches when making significant changes to the build process or dependencies.


55-55: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix environment variable reference syntax in cache keys

The CACHE_INDEX environment variable is incorrectly referenced. GitHub Actions requires environment variables to be accessed through the env context.

Apply this change to all cache key definitions:

-key: deps-${{ matrix.config.name }}-${{ matrix.build_type.config }}-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}-${{CACHE_INDEX}}
+key: deps-${{ matrix.config.name }}-${{ matrix.build_type.config }}-${{ hashFiles('**/conanfile.py') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/CMakePresets.json') }}-${{ env.CACHE_INDEX }}

Also applies to: 116-116, 194-194


63-63: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix environment variable reference syntax in Qt installation cache key prefixes

The CACHE_INDEX environment variable is incorrectly referenced in the Qt installation cache key prefixes.

Apply this change to all Qt installation steps:

-cache-key-prefix: ${{CACHE_INDEX}}
+cache-key-prefix: ${{ env.CACHE_INDEX }}

Also applies to: 105-105, 183-183, 263-263

@@ -24,7 +26,7 @@ jobs:
config: [{name: ci-ubuntu-gcc, os: ubuntu-latest},
{name: ci-ubuntu-clang, os: ubuntu-latest},
{name: ci-windows, os: windows-latest},
{name: ci-macos, os: macos-12}]
{name: ci-macos, os: macos-latest}]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the output, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the available macOS runners. The script results show that GitHub Actions currently supports macOS versions 12 through 15, including ARM64 variants for versions 13-15.

Specify macOS version 14 instead of using latest

Using macos-latest may lead to unexpected behavior when GitHub automatically updates the runner. Based on the available runners, it's recommended to use macos-14 as it represents a stable, recent version while maintaining predictability in your CI pipeline.

  • Update line 29: Replace macos-latest with macos-14
  • Update line 142: Replace macos-latest with macos-14
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider using a specific macOS version instead of latest

While macos-latest automatically provides the most recent stable runner, it may introduce unexpected behavior when GitHub updates the runner version. Consider using a specific version (e.g., macos-13) for better stability and predictability.

Run this script to check the current macOS version and available options:

Also applies to: 142-142

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check current macOS runner version and available options

# Get current macos-latest version
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  /repos/actions/runner-images/contents/images/macos/macos-latest.json | jq -r '.content' | base64 -d | jq '.os_version'

# List available macOS runner versions
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  /repos/actions/runner-images/contents/images/macos | jq -r '.[].name' | grep macos

Length of output: 570

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
conanfile.py (1)

50-52: Consider version range for Qt dependency

The Qt requirement is pinned to exactly 5.15.14. Consider using a version range to allow for patch updates.

-            self.requires("qt/5.15.14", transitive_libs=True)
+            self.requires("qt/[>=5.15.14 <5.16]", transitive_libs=True)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d03d0b and b03e270.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (6 hunks)
  • cmake/variables.cmake (1 hunks)
  • conanfile.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
conanfile.py (2)

15-16: LGTM: Qt option follows existing pattern

The new with_qt option is consistently implemented following the existing pattern of optional features.


24-26: Consider version constraints for Qt shared library setting

While the Qt integration looks good, the qt:shared setting might need version-specific handling.

Consider documenting the rationale for forcing shared library mode in the comments, as this might affect downstream projects.

✅ Verification successful

Qt shared library setting is correctly configured

The qt:shared setting is properly configured in the conanfile.py. The file shows that Qt is only included when with_qt option is enabled, and when included, it uses Qt version 5.15.14 with transitive libraries. The shared library setting is defined as a default option, which is a standard and supported configuration for Qt in Conan.

  • The shared library setting is defined in the default options section, which is the correct location
  • Qt dependency is properly versioned (5.15.14) and includes transitive libraries
  • The configuration follows Conan's best practices for Qt integration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if Qt version 5.15.14 supports shared library option consistently
rg -A 5 "qt.*5\.15\.14.*shared" || rg -A 5 "qt.*shared.*5\.15\.14"

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the conanfile.py content to understand the Qt dependency configuration
cat conanfile.py

# Also search for any Qt-related settings or requirements
rg -l "requires.*qt" || rg -l "qt.*requires"

Length of output: 1667

cmake/variables.cmake (1)

111-113: LGTM: Qt integration follows existing patterns

The Qt integration in CMake is consistently implemented, following the same pattern as other optional features like SFML and GRPC.

However, let's verify the integration between CMake and Conan settings:

✅ Verification successful

Qt integration is properly configured and consistent

The verification confirms that the Qt integration is correctly implemented and consistent across the codebase:

  • CMake option RPP_BUILD_QT_CODE is properly defined with clear documentation in BUILDING.md
  • Conan option with_qt is correctly defined in conanfile.py with proper Qt dependency
  • The CMake-to-Conan bridge in variables.cmake correctly sets the Conan option when Qt is enabled
  • Dependencies.cmake properly handles Qt package discovery
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency between CMake and Conan Qt settings
echo "Checking CMake-Conan Qt integration consistency..."

# Look for Qt-related settings in CMake files
echo "CMake Qt settings:"
rg -l "RPP_BUILD_QT_CODE" 

# Look for corresponding Conan settings
echo "Conan Qt settings:"
rg -l "with_qt.*True"

Length of output: 462


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation details

# Check conanfile.py Qt options
echo "=== Conan Qt option definition ==="
rg "with_qt" conanfile.py -B 2 -A 2

# Check CMake Qt option definition
echo -e "\n=== CMake Qt option definition ==="
rg "RPP_BUILD_QT_CODE" cmake/variables.cmake -B 2 -A 2

# Check how Qt is used in dependencies
echo -e "\n=== Qt usage in dependencies.cmake ==="
rg "RPP_BUILD_QT_CODE" cmake/dependencies.cmake -B 2 -A 2

# Check documentation
echo -e "\n=== Qt build documentation ==="
rg "RPP_BUILD_QT_CODE" BUILDING.md -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 2340

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
cmake/dependencies.cmake (2)

51-57: Improve Qt version detection error handling.

While the Qt version detection logic is good, consider these improvements:

  1. Add REQUIRED to Qt6 find_package to fail fast if specified Qt6 is required
  2. Add explicit error message when neither Qt5 nor Qt6 is found
-  find_package(Qt6 COMPONENTS Widgets Core Gui QUIET)
+  find_package(Qt6 COMPONENTS Widgets Core Gui ${RPP_QT6_REQUIRED})
   if (Qt6_FOUND)
     SET(RPP_QT_TARGET Qt6)
   else()
     message("-- RPP: Can't find Qt6, searching for Qt5...")
-    find_package(Qt5 REQUIRED COMPONENTS Widgets Core Gui)
-    SET(RPP_QT_TARGET Qt5)
+    find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Widgets Core Gui)
+    if (Qt5_FOUND)
+      SET(RPP_QT_TARGET Qt5)
+    else()
+      message(FATAL_ERROR "Neither Qt6 nor Qt5 was found. Please install Qt development files.")
+    endif()
   endif()

Line range hint 61-69: Refactor Windows-specific DLL copying for better maintainability.

The current implementation repeats similar commands for each Qt component. Consider creating a list of components and using a foreach loop.

   if (WIN32)
-      add_custom_command (TARGET ${TARGET} POST_BUILD  COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E copy_if_different $<TARGET_FILE:${RPP_QT_TARGET}::Core> $<TARGET_FILE_DIR:${TARGET}>)
-      add_custom_command (TARGET ${TARGET} POST_BUILD  COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E copy_if_different $<TARGET_FILE:${RPP_QT_TARGET}::Widgets> $<TARGET_FILE_DIR:${TARGET}>)
-      add_custom_command (TARGET ${TARGET} POST_BUILD  COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E copy_if_different $<TARGET_FILE:${RPP_QT_TARGET}::Gui> $<TARGET_FILE_DIR:${TARGET}>)
+      set(QT_COMPONENTS Core Widgets Gui)
+      foreach(COMPONENT ${QT_COMPONENTS})
+        add_custom_command(
+          TARGET ${TARGET} POST_BUILD
+          COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E copy_if_different
+          $<TARGET_FILE:${RPP_QT_TARGET}::${COMPONENT}>
+          $<TARGET_FILE_DIR:${TARGET}>
+        )
+      endforeach()
    endif()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42b7895 and 6fd4f35.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmake/dependencies.cmake (1 hunks)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (1)

86-88: Consider standardizing Python version across jobs

The workflow uses different Python version specifications across jobs:

  • Most jobs use '3.6.x - 3.11.x'
  • The docs job uses a fixed "3.8"

Consider standardizing the Python version across all jobs for better consistency and maintainability.

Also applies to: 162-164

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7de75de and b4a01e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml (5 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci v2.yml (8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/analyzers.yml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci v2.yml (3)

19-20: LGTM: Environment variable addition for cache management

The addition of the CACHE_INDEX environment variable at the workflow level is a good practice for cache management and invalidation.


29-29: Use specific macOS version instead of latest

Using macos-latest may lead to unexpected behavior when GitHub automatically updates the runner. It's recommended to use macos-14 for better stability and predictability in your CI pipeline.

Also applies to: 125-125


55-55: Fix environment variable reference syntax in cache keys

The CACHE_INDEX environment variable is incorrectly referenced in the cache keys. GitHub Actions requires environment variables to be accessed through the env context.

Also applies to: 99-99, 175-175

@victimsnino victimsnino closed this Dec 3, 2024
@victimsnino victimsnino deleted the use_macos-latest branch December 3, 2024 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant