Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(sphinx): update conf #3682

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

sambacha
Copy link
Contributor

@sambacha sambacha commented Dec 5, 2023

language is English, not actually programming language.

this is super meta.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.81%. Comparing base (cbac5ab) to head (1af5a67).
Report is 253 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3682   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.81%   83.81%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines       12775    12775           
  Branches     2860     2860           
=======================================
  Hits        10708    10708           
  Misses       1643     1643           
  Partials      424      424           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -174,6 +168,7 @@
texinfo_documents = [
(
master_doc,
slug,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

stray space

Comment on lines +43 to +48
"sphinx.ext.autosummary",
"sphinx.ext.coverage",
"sphinx.ext.doctest",
"sphinx.ext.graphviz",
"sphinx.ext.intersphinx",
"sphinx.ext.linkcode",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need all of these extensions?

@charles-cooper
Copy link
Member

closing as stale, please reopen if you have bandwidth to address review comments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants