Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update act-rules-format.bs for secondary req and acc support #540

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 30, 2023
Merged

Update act-rules-format.bs for secondary req and acc support #540

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
fce0e02
Update act-rules-format.bs
kengdoj Aug 24, 2023
f86d0df
Update act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs
kengdoj Sep 14, 2023
8d21d31
Update act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs
kengdoj Nov 30, 2023
f03eafb
Merge branch 'main' into kengdoj-secreq-accsupport
daniel-montalvo Nov 30, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions act-rules-format/act-rules-format.bs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ A secondary accessibility requirement is a requirement that is correlated with t

When the rule is not designed to test the accessibility requirement, or failed outcomes of the rule still require further testing for the accessibility requirement, the rule <em class="rfc2119">may</em> map the accessibility requirement as Secondary. When an ACT rule maps to a Secondary requirement, it <em class="rfc2119">must</em> include an explanation of why that requirement is Secondary in the Background section of the rule.

When the rule is designed to test an accessibility requirement, limitations or differences in [accessibility support](#accessibility-support) shall not be a reason for that requirement to be a secondary accessibility requirement.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we replace "shall" with either "should" or "must"?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 

    +1 to "should"

kengdoj marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-montalvo daniel-montalvo Sep 4, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure about the word "limitations" here. Does not "differences" express by itself what we mean here?

Some scenarios when a rule will have Secondary requirements include:

Expand Down