Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

quick refactor on viewmodels and components to make them more uniform #1945

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

sawka
Copy link
Member

@sawka sawka commented Feb 10, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes refactor the frontend code to standardize view model instantiation and component rendering. In block.tsx, conditional logic for view model selection is replaced by a registry map that associates view types with constructors. Multiple view model classes across the project (including for preview, quicktips, sysinfo, terminal, virtual DOM, Wave AI, and web view) now include a new getter method, viewComponent, that returns the corresponding view component. Additionally, the HelpView function has been updated to accept a more generic type for view component properties. The type declarations in the custom definitions file have been extended to include new types for view components and view model classes and updated the ViewModel interface with a viewComponent property. These modifications provide a consistent method for linking view models with their UI components.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/app/block/block.tsx (1)

66-70: Conditional rendering of view component.
Providing a fallback message is good for debugging. Consider logging or clarifying the fallback cause for deeper insights.

frontend/types/custom.d.ts (1)

259-259: Consider adding generic type parameter to ViewComponent type.

The current definition could be more flexible with a generic parameter.

-declare type ViewComponent = React.FC<ViewComponentProps>;
+declare type ViewComponent<T extends ViewModel = ViewModel> = React.FC<ViewComponentProps<T>>;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f6dc43 and 21f6bf3.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • frontend/app/block/block.tsx (4 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/helpview/helpview.tsx (2 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/preview/preview.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/quicktipsview/quicktipsview.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/sysinfo/sysinfo.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/term/term.tsx (2 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/vdom/vdom-model.tsx (2 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/waveai/waveai.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (2 hunks)
  • frontend/types/custom.d.ts (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
frontend/app/block/block.tsx (6)

12-13: New imports for PreviewModel and SysinfoViewModel look consistent.
No issues found; the added imports align with the updated registry design.


27-30: Additional imports for specialized view models.
These imports (HelpViewModel, TermViewModel, WaveAiModel, WebViewModel) appear consistent with the newly introduced registry approach.


33-33: Extended React imports are appropriate.
The imports for memo, Suspense, etc., match usage in the file and are standard for React.


38-46: BlockRegistry introduced for streamlined instantiation.
This registry-based approach simplifies the logic significantly. One note: both "cpuplot" and "sysinfo" map to SysinfoViewModel; verify if that duplication is intentional or if consolidation is possible.


49-51: makeViewModel refactored to retrieve constructors from registry.
Well-structured fallback to makeDefaultViewModel. Consider logging unknown types to aid debugging.


87-87: Setting viewComponent to null for the default view model.
This is consistent with the new approach that overrides the component in specialized view models.

frontend/app/view/quicktipsview/quicktipsview.tsx (1)

19-21: Getter for viewComponent aligns with new architecture.
Exposing QuickTipsView via a getter is a clean design, matching the approach in other view models.

frontend/app/view/helpview/helpview.tsx (2)

144-145: Function signature updated to ViewComponentProps<HelpViewModel>.
This update makes the component more flexible and standard across the codebase.


170-170: Spreading props into WebView.
Passing all props into WebView increases consistency and allows future expansion without additional boilerplate.

frontend/types/custom.d.ts (3)

252-257: LGTM! Well-structured generic type definition.

The ViewComponentProps<T> type provides a consistent interface for view component props, ensuring type safety and standardization across all view components.


261-261: LGTM! Clear constructor type definition.

The ViewModelClass type correctly defines the expected constructor signature for view models.


276-276: LGTM! Consistent interface extension.

The addition of viewComponent to the ViewModel interface aligns with the refactoring goals.

frontend/app/view/sysinfo/sysinfo.tsx (1)

243-245: LGTM! Clean implementation of viewComponent getter.

The getter properly returns the SysinfoView component, adhering to the new interface requirement.

frontend/app/view/vdom/vdom-model.tsx (2)

12-12: LGTM! Proper import statement.

The import statement for VDomView is correctly placed with other imports.


187-189: LGTM! Clean implementation of viewComponent getter.

The getter properly returns the VDomView component, adhering to the new interface requirement.

frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (1)

179-181: LGTM! Clean implementation of viewComponent getter.

The getter properly returns the WebView component, adhering to the new interface requirement.

frontend/app/view/waveai/waveai.tsx (1)

287-289: LGTM!

The viewComponent getter implementation is clean and follows the consistent pattern of providing direct access to the associated view component.

frontend/app/view/term/term.tsx (2)

321-323: LGTM!

The viewComponent getter implementation is clean and follows the consistent pattern of providing direct access to the associated view component.


880-880: LGTM!

The update to use ViewComponentProps<TermViewModel> improves type safety by ensuring the component receives the correct view model type.

frontend/app/view/preview/preview.tsx (1)

485-487: LGTM!

The viewComponent getter implementation is clean and follows the consistent pattern of providing direct access to the associated view component.

Comment on lines +662 to +668
interface WebViewProps {
blockId: string;
model: WebViewModel;
onFailLoad?: (url: string) => void;
blockRef: React.RefObject<HTMLDivElement>;
contentRef: React.RefObject<HTMLDivElement>;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify the usage of contentRef prop.

The contentRef prop is added to the interface but appears to be unused in the WebView component implementation.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if contentRef is used in the component
rg -A 5 "contentRef" frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx

Length of output: 293


Content Reference Prop Issue in WebView Component

  • The contentRef property is declared in the WebViewProps interface but is not deconstructed or used in the WebView component.
  • The component only destructures { model, onFailLoad, blockRef }, confirming that contentRef is currently unused.

@sawka sawka merged commit f092787 into main Feb 11, 2025
5 of 7 checks passed
@sawka sawka deleted the sawka/generic-models branch February 11, 2025 00:26
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/types/custom.d.ts (2)

264-290: Consider making essential properties required.

Properties like viewType, viewName, and viewIcon appear to be essential for view model functionality. Consider making them required by removing the optional modifier (?).

-        viewIcon?: jotai.Atom<string | IconButtonDecl>;
+        viewIcon: jotai.Atom<string | IconButtonDecl>;

-        viewName?: jotai.Atom<string>;
+        viewName: jotai.Atom<string>;

264-314: Standardize JSDoc comments for better documentation.

While the comments are descriptive, consider using JSDoc format for better IDE integration and documentation generation.

Example format:

-        // The type of view, used for identifying and rendering the appropriate component.
+        /** The type of view, used for identifying and rendering the appropriate component. */
         viewType: string;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21f6bf3 and e91be98.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/app/block/blockframe.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/types/custom.d.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • frontend/app/block/blockframe.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/types/custom.d.ts (1)

252-261: LGTM! Well-structured type declarations for view components.

The new type declarations provide a solid foundation for standardizing view components across the application. The use of generics and proper type constraints ensures type safety.

Comment on lines +297 to +299
// The main view component associated with this ViewModel.
viewComponent: ViewComponent<ViewModel>;

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix the type of viewComponent property.

The viewComponent property should use the generic type parameter of the interface for better type safety.

-        viewComponent: ViewComponent<ViewModel>;
+        viewComponent: ViewComponent<this>;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// The main view component associated with this ViewModel.
viewComponent: ViewComponent<ViewModel>;
// The main view component associated with this ViewModel.
viewComponent: ViewComponent<this>;

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant