Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: improve member api for brb, update test-app with brb #4027
feat: improve member api for brb, update test-app with brb #4027
Changes from 2 commits
118936a
53df0d0
c84ed07
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would change the wording here to "Step Away" and "Back to Meeting". That just seems the most clear to me, and having it match the client UI makes it easy to understand that this is mapped to the step away feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@brycetham I have tried this combination, but I don't like that "Back to Meeting" span on two lines and I can't do a style fix for that easily, I need to change the style for the table, not sure if this is worth that, but I'm open to discuss
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm just looking at
ParticipantWithRoles
... in that type, neithercontrols
norrole
is optional, so I just want to double check that we do wantcontrols
andbrb
to both be optional here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@brycetham good point. I believe this type is wrong, because I reused this function
getControlsRoles
logic and it contains optional chaining inside, so I assume it can beundefined
but the type doesn't show that. For example, when this brb feature doesn't work I believe it can be optional. In most cases in code logic when they deal withcontrols
logic we have undefined checks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@brycetham I couldn't find information in the locus dto documents, so I will remove the optional parameter since none of my test cases require it to be optional.