Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to export library as webgmex #333

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pmeijer
Copy link
Contributor

@pmeijer pmeijer commented Jul 16, 2024

No description provided.

@pmeijer pmeijer changed the title WIP: Add option to export library as webgmex at export Add option to export library as webgmex Jul 16, 2024
@pmeijer pmeijer requested a review from kecso July 16, 2024 22:06
@pmeijer pmeijer self-assigned this Jul 16, 2024
Copy link
Member

@kecso kecso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it in general, and if there is no change required in regards my comments, I can live with that :).

.then(function (rawJson) {
if (parameters.libraryName) {
// We need to adjust this when the exportee was a library.
delete rawJson.kind; // This is lost at this point.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i believe i know where this come from, but is this really the good behavior?
shouldn't we enhance the library info with the kind to begin with?

.finally(restoreProcessFunctions)
.nodeify(done);
});

it('should fail to exportProjectToFile when branchName does not exist.', function (done) {
var worker = getSimpleWorker();

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any chance to add a test that would use the exported libary and run some traversal to see if everything goes well during the read of the nodes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants