-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[feature_file] Create feature process file
As discussed in process and tracking tool discussion, port Brian's table to adoc format in this repo
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
117 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ | ||
= WildFly Feature Development Process | ||
|
||
WildFly features can have one of four different maturity levels, “Experimental”, “Preview”, “Community” and an unnamed default level. Promotion from one level to another, or initial feature incorporation at a given level, requires meeting various standards in the basic areas of requirements analysis, implementation, testing and documentation. The following table outlines the various standards for each of the maturity levels. | ||
|
||
[cols="5"] | ||
|=== | ||
| | ||
|Experimental | ||
|Preview | ||
|Community | ||
|Default | ||
|Feature Team | ||
|Component lead or other SME | ||
|Experimental plus: + | ||
|
||
3rd party with a different perspective, able to question the feature requirements and API | ||
|Preview plus: | ||
|Community plus: | ||
|Requirement Analysis | ||
|Understandable JIRA description with an orientation toward what/why and not just how | ||
|Approved WildFly Proposals document | ||
|
||
Nice-to-have requirements allowed. | ||
|Approved WildFly Proposals document | ||
|
||
Nice-to-have requirements have been converted to non-requirements or are moved to a future work section. | ||
|Approved WildFly Proposals document | ||
|
||
Nice-to-have requirements have been converted to non-requirements or are moved to a future work section | ||
|Implementation | ||
|Primary use cases covered. | ||
|
||
Code style standards followed. | ||
|
||
Management API has experimental metadata | ||
|
||
Feature not used at runtime if not in experimental level | ||
|
||
New libraries not provisioned if not in appropriate stability level ??? | ||
|
||
Third party libraries in Final version?? | ||
|All hard requirements in analysis covered | ||
|
||
Management API has preview metadata | ||
|
||
Feature not used at runtime if not in preview level | ||
|
||
New libraries not provisioned if not in appropriate stability level ??? | ||
|Stable API and behavior. | ||
|
||
All hard requirements in analysis covered | ||
|
||
Management API has community metadata | ||
|
||
Feature not used at runtime if not in community level | ||
|
||
New libraries not provisioned if not in appropriate stability level ??? | ||
|Stable API and behavior | ||
|
||
All hard requirements in analysis covered | ||
|Domain Transformation | ||
|Encouraged | ||
|Encouraged | ||
|Encouraged | ||
|Required | ||
|Component Validation | ||
|Acceptable Open Source License | ||
|Experimental plus: | ||
|
||
Uses maintained components | ||
|
||
Component available from JBoss Nexus or maven central | ||
|Preview plus: | ||
|
||
Uses up-to-date maintained components | ||
|Community plus: | ||
|
||
Identified maintainer | ||
|Test Plan | ||
|Not required | ||
|Required -- TODO what it means | ||
|Required -- TODO what it means | ||
|Formal test plan approved by a professional Quality Engineer with subject matter expertise | ||
|Test Development | ||
|Standard subsystem tests. | ||
|
||
Smoke tests of main functional areas. | ||
|Standard subsystem tests. | ||
|
||
Test coverage as per test plan. | ||
|Standard subsystem tests. | ||
|
||
Test coverage as per test plan. | ||
|Standard subsystem tests | ||
|
||
Domain transformation tests | ||
|
||
Test coverage as per test plan | ||
|Test Verification | ||
|Code review and CI | ||
|Code review and CI | ||
|Code review and CI | ||
|Verification by a professional Quality Engineer with subject matter expertise | ||
|Documentation | ||
|Understandable JIRA description. | ||
|
||
Correct management API metadata | ||
|Correct management API metadata | ||
|
||
Documentation content as per analysis. | ||
|Correct management API metadata | ||
|
||
Documentation content as per analysis. | ||
|Correct management API metadata | ||
|
||
Documentation content as per analysis. | ||
|=== |