feat(e2ei): init e2ei based on client state (WPB-353)

[mchenani]

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

We need to call different functions to initiate the e2eiClient from the MLSClient, this consideration added to the E2EIClientProvider by this PR.

Needs releases with:
After:
#2156

• GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

• I have added automated test to this contribution

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results

       1 files   - 457         1 suites   - 457   8s ⏱️ - 2m 19s
1 800 tests  - 753  1 795 ✔️  - 654  5 💤  - 99  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit aeec26b. ± Comparison against base commit 97ad1de.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

All test runs 10ed229 🔗

✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 0 with New Flaky, 2 Passed

Test Services

Service Name	Failed	Known Flaky	New Flaky	Passed	Skipped	Wall Time	Branch View
kalium-ios	0	0	0	1773	30	10.1s	Link
kalium-jvm	0	0	0	2452	104	11m 10s	Link

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2159 (7954613) into develop (3df8be3) will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 82.00%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #2159      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      57.81%   57.88%   +0.06%     
  Complexity        21       21              
=============================================
  Files           1059     1059              
  Lines          40166    40190      +24     
  Branches        3720     3722       +2     
=============================================
+ Hits           23223    23265      +42     
+ Misses         15336    15314      -22     
- Partials        1607     1611       +4     

Files	Coverage Δ
...ire/kalium/logic/data/client/E2EIClientProvider.kt	86.48% <100.00%> (+83.15%)	⬆️
...lium/logic/data/conversation/ConversationMapper.kt	58.58% <100.00%> (+0.57%)	⬆️
...gic/data/conversation/MLSConversationRepository.kt	84.42% <100.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
.../com/wire/kalium/logic/data/user/UserRepository.kt	57.53% <ø> (ø)
.../com/wire/kalium/logic/data/e2ei/E2EIRepository.kt	81.48% <84.61%> (ø)
...monMain/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/cryptography/IDs.kt	74.35% <76.92%> (+5.39%)	⬆️
...n/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/cryptography/MLSClient.kt	81.48% <33.33%> (-13.98%)	⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3df8be3...7954613. Read the comment docs.