chore: observe only current call [WPB-3959]

[Garzas]

WPB-3959 Android - Some avatars are default(not visible) in a group call

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

• added callerId to CallMetadata to not unnecessary execute db queries for current established call
• improved callerId parsing (it was parsed twice in some scenarios)
• introduced ObserveEstablishedCallWithSortedParticipantsUseCase to only listen for current call and to not sort participants on every call

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 198 tests  +1   3 093 ✔️ +1   3m 43s ⏱️ +12s
   550 suites ±0      105 💤 ±0 
   550 files   ±0          0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 0052aab. ± Comparison against base commit 7f991e6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher

Report	Fri, September 13, 2024 at 15:21:11 UTC
Project	kalium
Branch	chore/observe-current-call
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: The following Measure does not have a Threshold. Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated!

• Latency (latency)

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	Latency Results nanoseconds (ns)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	➖ (view plot)	685,751.25
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	➖ (view plot)	324,782,642.29
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	➖ (view plot)	919,795,361.97
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	➖ (view plot)	21,751,921.74

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 15.00000% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 52.49%. Comparing base (7f991e6) to head (0052aab).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rveEstablishedCallWithSortedParticipantsUseCase.kt	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
...n/com/wire/kalium/logic/feature/call/CallsScope.kt	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
.../com/wire/kalium/logic/data/call/CallRepository.kt	60.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ain/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/logic/data/call/Call.kt	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...wire/kalium/logic/data/call/CallMetadataProfile.kt	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...lium/logic/feature/call/scenario/OnIncomingCall.kt	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...m/wire/kalium/logic/data/call/mapper/CallMapper.kt	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3011      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    52.52%   52.49%   -0.03%     
===========================================
  Files         1299     1300       +1     
  Lines        49953    49967      +14     
  Branches      4655     4656       +1     
===========================================
- Hits         26238    26232       -6     
- Misses       21835    21853      +18     
- Partials      1880     1882       +2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ain/kotlin/com/wire/kalium/logic/data/call/Call.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...wire/kalium/logic/data/call/CallMetadataProfile.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...lium/logic/feature/call/scenario/OnIncomingCall.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...m/wire/kalium/logic/data/call/mapper/CallMapper.kt	72.50% <0.00%> (-0.84%)	⬇️
.../com/wire/kalium/logic/data/call/CallRepository.kt	87.06% <60.00%> (-0.48%)	⬇️
...n/com/wire/kalium/logic/feature/call/CallsScope.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rveEstablishedCallWithSortedParticipantsUseCase.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7f991e6...0052aab. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: chore/observe-current-call
Commit report: 4305e85
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3093 Passed, 105 Skipped, 12.84s Total Time

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud