feat: Delete group as admin [WPB-11559]

[m-zagorski]

WPB-11559 [Android] Delete a group as admin

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-11559

What's new in this PR?

Issues

We want to allow admins to delete group conversations

Solutions

In order to delete group as an admin, we have to be in the same team, so we need to know our own team id, to later
check in the client if were matching the team

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 299 tests  ±0   3 192 ✅ ±0   4m 44s ⏱️ -22s
  563 suites ±0     107 💤 ±0 
  563 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2938636. ± Comparison against base commit 2dccbfe.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	feat/delete-group-as-admin
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	nanoseconds (ns)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	657,773.80
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	402,857,251.60
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,323,122,582.06
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,746,231.31

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.33333% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.03%. Comparing base (3bf74f0) to head (2938636).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...a/conversation/ConversationRepositoryExtensions.kt	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ire/kalium/logic/data/conversation/Conversation.kt	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
.../logic/data/conversation/ConversationRepository.kt	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3115      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    54.07%   54.03%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files         1232     1245      +13     
  Lines        36006    36141     +135     
  Branches      3653     3652       -1     
===========================================
+ Hits         19469    19528      +59     
- Misses       15128    15205      +77     
+ Partials      1409     1408       -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...lium/logic/data/conversation/ConversationMapper.kt	57.97% <100.00%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
...nversation/folders/ConversationFolderRepository.kt	91.48% <100.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
...ire/kalium/logic/data/conversation/Conversation.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../logic/data/conversation/ConversationRepository.kt	62.87% <83.33%> (+0.50%)	⬆️
...a/conversation/ConversationRepositoryExtensions.kt	84.00% <50.00%> (-2.96%)	⬇️

... and 28 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3bf74f0...2938636. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: feat/delete-group-as-admin
Commit report: e3e0044
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3192 Passed, 107 Skipped, 33.63s Total Time

[MohamadJaara]

There is no need to add the user self team ID to the conversation model, since it is fixed and is not really conversation related, if you need it in the UI part to get whether a conversation can be deleted or not, please expose it as its own use case and use it in the UI