feat: support other message types [WPB-10575]

[vitorhugods]

WPB-10575 Cross Platform Backup: Write common backup / restore library

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

Extend support to other message types, like Assets and Location.

Solutions

Rely for now on the most certain data. We can fine-tune this with other clients later.

Dependencies

Needs releases with:

• chore: create backup protobuf models [WPB-10575] #3116
• chore: create backup module [WPB-10575] #3117
• feat: add initial crossplatform backup serialization [WPB-10575] #3121

Testing

Test Coverage

• I have added automated test to this contribution

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 313 tests   3 206 ✅  5m 19s ⏱️
  566 suites    107 💤
  566 files        0 ❌

Results for commit 6157bf2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	feat/support-other-message-types
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	nanoseconds (ns)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	657,889.80
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	552,671,175.09
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,311,862,234.60
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,536,535.53

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (epic/multiplatform-backup@ccb8193). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                     Coverage Diff                      @@
##             epic/multiplatform-backup    #3122   +/-   ##
============================================================
  Coverage                             ?   54.03%           
============================================================
  Files                                ?     1246           
  Lines                                ?    36152           
  Branches                             ?     3656           
============================================================
  Hits                                 ?    19535           
  Misses                               ?    15207           
  Partials                             ?     1410           

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ccb8193...6157bf2. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: feat/support-other-message-types
Commit report: c100eee
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3206 Passed, 107 Skipped, 38.65s Total Time

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.