feat: support Proteus federation if MLS not supported by backend (WPB-14456) 🍒

[github-actions]

WPB-14456 [Android] Still allow usage of federation for proteus in some cases

This PR was automatically cherry-picked based on the following PR:

• feat: support Proteus federation if MLS not supported by backend (WPB-14250) #3126

Original PR description:

---

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

We need to support federation search, according to if MLS is enabled, or if it is configured or not in the backend.

Solutions

Create a new use case centralizing the logic to decide if we need to support federation or not for this: team/conversation/backend.

Before the logic was in the view model in AR, but here is centralized and we can test all the cases for it, therefore now the view model just calls this use case to decide if we need to enable cross domain search.

Dependencies (Optional)

• feat: support Proteus federation if MLS not supported by backend (WPB-14456) wire-android#3668

Needs releases with:

• GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

• I have added automated test to this contribution

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 335 tests  +5   3 228 ✅ +5   5m 7s ⏱️ +25s
  572 suites +1     107 💤 ±0 
  572 files   +1       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5217b78. ± Comparison against base commit b7b4bd2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	feat/support-proteus-federation-if-mls-disabled-cherry-pick
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	nanoseconds (ns)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	657,659.61
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	602,917,857.29
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,326,722,264.71
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,765,811.76

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.21%. Comparing base (b7b4bd2) to head (5217b78).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...feature/search/IsFederationSearchAllowedUseCase.kt	72.00%	2 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...om/wire/kalium/logic/feature/search/SearchScope.kt	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3132      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    54.21%   54.21%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1250     1251       +1     
  Lines        36328    36358      +30     
  Branches      3658     3668      +10     
===========================================
+ Hits         19697    19712      +15     
- Misses       15218    15227       +9     
- Partials      1413     1419       +6     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...om/wire/kalium/logic/feature/search/SearchScope.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...feature/search/IsFederationSearchAllowedUseCase.kt	72.00% <72.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b7b4bd2...5217b78. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: feat/support-proteus-federation-if-mls-disabled-cherry-pick
Commit report: 8517cc3
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3228 Passed, 107 Skipped, 40.69s Total Time