feat: Add getSenderNameByMessageId useCase WPB-11723

[borichellow]

WPB-11723 [Android] Playback improvement - 1 - Scroll / Duration / Speed

What's new in this PR?

Need an option to get senders name by MessageId.
Of course we could use existed GetMessageByIdUseCase and get sender from it. But this useCase trigger query to a lot of tables, so better to add some small query and UseCase.

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 360 tests  +6   3 253 ✅ +6   5m 31s ⏱️ -10s
  575 suites +1     107 💤 ±0 
  575 files   +1       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit c0aef5c. ± Comparison against base commit 91b8319.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	feat/add_get_sender_name_by_message_id_use_case
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	nanoseconds (ns)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	663,594.42
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	543,597,527.63
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,314,341,216.60
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,458,078.19

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: feat/add_get_sender_name_by_message_id_use_case
Commit report: d470122
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3253 Passed, 107 Skipped, 1m 2.46s Total Time

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 77.77778% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.11%. Comparing base (91b8319) to head (c0aef5c).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ire/kalium/logic/data/message/MessageRepository.kt	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...feature/message/GetSenderNameByMessageIdUseCase.kt	90.90%	1 Missing ⚠️
.../wire/kalium/logic/feature/message/MessageScope.kt	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...e/kalium/persistence/dao/message/MessageDAOImpl.kt	75.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3186      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    54.10%   54.11%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1256     1257       +1     
  Lines        36661    36679      +18     
  Branches      3726     3727       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits         19834    19848      +14     
- Misses       15387    15390       +3     
- Partials      1440     1441       +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../wire/kalium/persistence/dao/message/MessageDAO.kt	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../wire/kalium/persistence/db/UserDatabaseBuilder.kt	77.84% <100.00%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
...ire/kalium/logic/data/message/MessageRepository.kt	49.40% <0.00%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
...feature/message/GetSenderNameByMessageIdUseCase.kt	90.90% <90.90%> (ø)
.../wire/kalium/logic/feature/message/MessageScope.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...e/kalium/persistence/dao/message/MessageDAOImpl.kt	70.67% <75.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 91b8319...c0aef5c. Read the comment docs.