* Refactor.
* Refactor.
* Refactor.
* Make test case fail where it should pass.
* Cleanup failing test cases.
- add old run traces (with approved device) back
* FUTUREWORK.
* Changelog.
* Make failing test case pass.
Pending LH devices means user *has* given consent, not the opposite!
* Fix terminology.
* Make default settings explicit.
* Renames; fix more LH logic.
transitioning from disabled to pending doesn't block any connections,
but from pending to active does.
* Rename.
* Fixup HEAD~2
* Remove dead code.
* testLHMessageExchange: Assert that message exchange works during all stages of multiple people approving the device
* Fix comment wording
* Delete redundant constraints
* testLHMessageExchange: Ensure correct client is used to send messages
* testLHNoConsentBlockOne2OneConv: Break the test in 2 for simplicity
Also fix assertions about what happens when LH devices are pending
* brig: Do not cause LH conflict when a user has pending device while creating connections
* testLHPreventAddingNonConsentingUsers: Users are only kicked after approving the LH device
* hlint
* integration/connectTwoUsers: Don't worry too much if users are already connected
* galley: Allow non-lh-consenting users to be added to a conv when lh is pending on a member
---------
Co-authored-by: Akshay Mankar <[email protected]>
