Bugfix/extra whitespace in code #12570
Open
+9
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a similar solution as seen in shikijs/shiki#585
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: ad62af1 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
github-actions
bot
added
feat: markdown
1 task
bluwy
reviewed
Dec 2, 2024
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
Sorry, something went wrong.
GrimLink
force-pushed
the
bugfix/extra-whitespace-in-code
branch
from
818f8ac
to
e52591a
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
the
pkg: integration
bluwy
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
This fixes the extra line added in the code blocks as reported in #12515 using the same method as seen in shikijs/shiki#585 as suggested by @bluwy
Now this option is enabled by default, same as seen in shiki, but can be disabled trough a option.
Testing
Testing was done manually in my own Astro project and I made sure to run both
pnpm run buildandpnpm run testto see that this PR had no impact on one of the actions.This change also does not include any new tests in the
@astrojs/markdown-remarkpackage,since this option works similar to the
wrapoption, which also has no test.Docs
A update to the docs will be needed, since this adds a new option to opt out of this behavior.
/cc @withastro/maintainers-docs for feedback!