Update Cliar Figure Issue #322

app/report.Rmd

@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Report generated on : `r format(Sys.time(), "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")`
 **The CLIAR Benchmarking is a quick and accessible methodology that quantitatively assesses the strengths and weaknesses of a country’s institutional dimensions against a set of comparator countries.** A set of curated institutional indicators are aggregated institutional clusters so to empirically map the institutional capital across substantive issue areas. There are 13 institutional families, or clusters: (1) political institutions; (2) social institutions; (3) degree of integrity, (4) transparency and accountability institutions; (5) justice institutions, (6) public finance institutions, (7) public sector human resources management, (8) digital government and data institutions; (9) business environment institutions; (10) labor and social protection institutions; (11) SOE corporate governance institutions; (12) service delivery institutions; and (13) energy and environment. 
 
 ```{r, fig.cap="CLIAR Institutional clusters"}
-knitr::include_graphics("www/families.png")
+knitr::include_graphics("www/new_families.png")
 ```
 
 **The CLIAR Benchmarking generates systematic evidence needed to map out a country’s institutional profile, and it does so in a standardized, transparent, and replicable way.** This provides a robust data-driven base to guide the selection of a subset of issues related to the identified gaps that can be subject to in-depth investigation, as an inherent limitation of the benchmarking exercise is that it is not intended as an exhaustive and comprehensive analysis of the specific institutional constraints of each country and may not authoritatively identify all key institutional shortcomings, but rather as a basis for customizing it to the best extent possible to the country context and better engage into a “Country Deep-Dive”.