update to pull pico changes #7
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ypeArgInferenceUtil#assignedTo()
…bstitution (typetools#2876)" This reverts commit 719ff2c
…pevar substitution (typetools#2876)"" This reverts commit 09142ab
lnsun
force-pushed
the
pull-pico-changes
branch
3 times, most recently
from
4928266 to
8579469
Compare
|
Cool! All the tests passed! |
…of AnnotationMirrors (typetools#3366) Sets were used in the past because @PolyAll could be instantiated with multiple qualifiers.
…ypetools#3385) It was undocumented and identical to fromCompilationResults()
Update from typetool 2020-06-23
…into pull-pico-changes # Conflicts: # framework/src/main/java/org/checkerframework/framework/type/poly/AbstractQualifierPolymorphism.java
|
Stale pull request message |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Test PR of all changes in pull-pico-changes.
Splitted to opprop#140, opprop#141, opprop#142, opprop#145