-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mutable Metadata group name Part 1 #643
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0ffe009
Update openmls to point to fork pr
cameronvoell 1bfe1bb
updated protos and related group permissions
cameronvoell fe57b07
added update metadata intent and mutablemetada obj
cameronvoell c38d00f
feat: initial setup for mutable metadata
cameronvoell a236ed4
update openmls ref to commit on xmtp main
cameronvoell d91fe5b
remove redundant struct from and to methods when we have TryFrom traits
cameronvoell File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | ||
use openmls::{ | ||
extensions::{Extension, UnknownExtension}, | ||
group::MlsGroup as OpenMlsGroup, | ||
}; | ||
use prost::Message; | ||
use thiserror::Error; | ||
|
||
use xmtp_proto::xmtp::mls::message_contents::GroupMutableMetadataV1 as GroupMutableMetadataProto; | ||
|
||
#[derive(Debug, Error)] | ||
pub enum GroupMutableMetadataError { | ||
#[error("serialization: {0}")] | ||
Serialization(#[from] prost::EncodeError), | ||
#[error("deserialization: {0}")] | ||
Deserialization(#[from] prost::DecodeError), | ||
#[error("missing extension")] | ||
MissingExtension, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)] | ||
pub struct GroupMutableMetadata { | ||
pub group_name: String, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl GroupMutableMetadata { | ||
pub fn new(group_name: String) -> Self { | ||
Self { | ||
group_name | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl TryFrom<GroupMutableMetadata> for Vec<u8> { | ||
type Error = GroupMutableMetadataError; | ||
|
||
fn try_from(value: GroupMutableMetadata) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> { | ||
let mut buf = Vec::new(); | ||
let proto_val = GroupMutableMetadataProto { | ||
group_name: value.group_name.clone() | ||
}; | ||
proto_val.encode(&mut buf)?; | ||
|
||
Ok(buf) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl TryFrom<&Vec<u8>> for GroupMutableMetadata { | ||
type Error = GroupMutableMetadataError; | ||
|
||
fn try_from(value: &Vec<u8>) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> { | ||
let proto_val = GroupMutableMetadataProto::decode(value.as_slice())?; | ||
Self::from_proto(proto_val) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl TryFrom<GroupMutableMetadataProto> for GroupMutableMetadata { | ||
type Error = GroupMutableMetadataError; | ||
|
||
fn try_from(value: GroupMutableMetadataProto) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> { | ||
Self::new(value.group_name.clone()) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
pub fn extract_group_mutable_metadata( | ||
group: &OpenMlsGroup, | ||
) -> Result<GroupMutableMetadata, GroupMutableMetadataError> { | ||
todo!() | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[cfg(test)] | ||
mod tests { | ||
|
||
use super::*; | ||
#[test] | ||
fn test_preconfigured_mutable_metadata() { | ||
// TODO add test here | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I kinda think we should have a new type of policy for metadata. Some of the
MembershipPolicies
aren't applicable here (for example,AllowSameMember
) and it makes easier to be misused having that as an option.What if we had a different type, like
MetadataPolicy
that can be more tailored towards updating metadata.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, ill make that update 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@neekolas updating to include a new
MetadataPolicy
type actually adds a lot of cascading updates, since it touches all the validation logic. I was going to tackle validation logic in part 3, so how do we feel about leaving MetadataPolicy to the part 3 PR?