Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
small fixes to projoint and 03-predict
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
aaronrkaufman committed Aug 16, 2023
1 parent 4605268 commit 481403a
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion R/projoint.R
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#' @param .se_method By default, \code{c("analytic", "simulation", "bootstrap")} description
#' @param .irr \code{NULL} (default) if IRR is to be calculated using the repeated task. Otherwise, a numerical value
#' @param .remove_ties Logical: should ties be removed before estimation? Defaults to \code{TRUE}.
#' @param .ignore_position NULL (default) if \code{.structure = "profile_level"}. Set to TRUE if you ignore the position of profile (left or right); FALSE if the relative positioning of profiles matters for analysis. If \code{.structure = "profile_level"} and this argument is \code{NULL}, it is automatically reset to \code{TRUE}.
#' @param .ignore_position NULL (default) if \code{.structure = "profile_level"}. Set to TRUE if you ignore the position of profile (left or right); FALSE if the relative positioning of profiles matters for analysis. If \code{.structure = "choice_level"} and this argument is \code{NULL}, it is automatically reset to \code{TRUE}.
#' @param .n_sims The number of simulations. Relevant only if \code{.se_method == "simulation"}
#' @param .n_boot The number of bootstrapped samples. Relevant only if \code{.se_method == "bootstrap"}
#' @param .weights_1 the weight to estimate IRR (see \code{\link[estimatr]{lm_robust}}): \code{NULL} (default)
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion vignettes/03-predict.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ vignette: >
%\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}
---

We use two methods to estimate intra-respondent reliability (IRR). The first-best method requires researchers to add a repeated task to their conjoint survey, but is the most reliable. The second method, which uses linear extrapolation, does not require a repeated task but is noisier. If no repeated task is specified, we can use the `predict_tau` function to pe
We use two methods to estimate intra-respondent reliability (IRR). The first-best method requires researchers to add a repeated task to their conjoint survey, but is the most reliable. The second method, which uses linear extrapolation, does not require a repeated task but is noisier. If no repeated task is specified, we can use the `predict_tau` function to perform the extrapolation method and estimate IRR.

### 3.1 Load the projoint package

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 481403a

Please sign in to comment.