Split ConstraintSystem
into a builder type and a verifying key type
#781
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an initial refactor performed during Halo 2 Office Hours, to explore the effects of this split on the wider codebase.
At the end, we discussed the result, and noted that the verifying key type still contains data in sub-types that is irrelevant to the actual verifying key. The verifying key type is also never exposed in the public API of the verifying key;
ConstraintSystem
was only public for its use inCircuit::configure
.The likely next steps are:
PinnedConstraintSystem
to be the verifying key type, only storing the data needed for the transcript, but being an owned type that exposes immutable references via methods instead of its fields beingpub(crate)
.ConstraintSystemBuilder
rename, so we are just removing parts of theConstraintSystem
API.ConstraintSystem::pinned
andVerifyingKey::from_parts
to instead become the builder method for the verifying key type along with the data that is cached alongside it insideVerifyingKey
.