This work is developed by Simulink, Matlab R2020b.
A three-tank system, as sketched in Fig. 1, has typical characteristics of tanks, pipelines and pumps used in chemical industry and thus often serves as a benchmark process in laboratories for process control.
The model and the parameters of the three-tank system introduced here are from the laboratory setup DTS200 (see [3]).
Parameters | Symbol | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|---|
cross section area of tanks | |||
cross section area of pipes | |||
max. height of tanks | |||
max. flow rate of pump 1 | |||
max. flow rate of pump 2 | |||
coeff. of flow for pipe 1 | |||
coeff. of flow for pipe 2 | |||
coeff. of flow for pipe 3 |
$ s_{13} = s_{23} = s_0 = s_n = 0.5\ cm^2$
Input variables: $ u = [Q1\ Q2]^T$ Measurements: $ y = [h_1\ h_2\ h_3]^T $
Applying the incoming and outgoing mass flows under consideration of Torricelli’s law, the dynamics of DTS200 is modeled by
The linear form of the above model can be achieved by a linearization at an operating point as follows:
$$ \begin{equation} \begin{split} \begin{array}{l} \dot x = Ax + Bu,y = Cx\ x = \left[ {\begin{array}{{20}{c}} {{h_1} - {h_{1,o}}}\ {{h_2} - {h_{2,o}}}\ {{h_3} - {h_{3,o}}} \end{array}} \right],u = \left[ {\begin{array}{{20}{c}} {{Q_1} - {Q_{1,o}}}\ {{Q_2} - {Q_{2,o}}} \end{array}} \right],{Q_o} = \left[ {\begin{array}{{20}{c}} {{Q_{1,o}}}\ {{Q_{2,o}}} \end{array}} \right]\ A = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial g}}\left| {_{h = {h_o}},B = } \right.\left[ {\begin{array}{{20}{c}} {\begin{array}{{20}{c}} {\frac{1}{{\cal A}}}\ 0\ 0 \end{array}}&{\begin{array}{{20}{c}} 0\ {\frac{1}{{\cal A}}}\ 0 \end{array}} \end{array}} \right],C = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 1&0&0\ 0&1&0\ 0&0&1 \end{array}} \right] \end{array} \end{split} \end{equation} $$
$$ \begin{equation} \begin{split} f\left( h \right) = \left[ {\begin{array}{{20}{c}} {\frac{-a_1 s_{13}sign(h_1-h_3)\sqrt{2g|h_1-h_3|})}{{\cal A}}}\ {\frac{a_3 s_{23}sign(h_3-h_2)\sqrt{2g|h_3-h_2|}-a_2s_0\sqrt{2gh_2})}{{\cal A}}}\ {\frac{a_1 s_{13}sign(h_1-h_3)\sqrt{2g|h_1-h_3|}-a_3s_{23}sign(h_3-h_2)\sqrt{2g|h_3-h_2|}}{{\cal A}}} \end{array}} \right],h = \left[ {\begin{array}{{20}{c}} {h_1}\ {h_2}\ {h_3} \end{array}} \right] \end{split} \end{equation} $$
Twelve different faults were injected starting at the 200th sample.
Fault ID | Description | Location |
---|---|---|
1 | Actuator | |
2 | Actuator | |
3 | Actuator | |
4 | Sensor | |
5 | Sensor | |
6 | Sensor | |
7,8,9 | Process | |
10 | Process | |
11 | Process | |
12 | Process |
The system contianed fault signals can be represented by
$$ \begin{equation} \begin{split} &\mathcal{A} \dot{h}1 = Q_1 + f_1 + f_2 - Q{13} - f_7 \check Q_{10} + \omega_1\ &\mathcal{A} \dot{h}2 = Q_2 + f_1 + f_3 + Q{32} - f_8 (f_{11}+1) \check Q_{20} + \omega_2 \ &\mathcal{A} \dot{h}3 = Q{13} - Q_{32} - f_9 \check Q_{30} + \omega_3\ &Q_{13} = a_1 s_{13} (f_{10}+1) sign(h_1-h_3) \sqrt{2g \left| h_1 - h_3 \right| } \ &Q_{32} = a_3 s_{23} (f_{12}+1) sign(h_3-h_2) \sqrt{2g \left| h_3 - h_2 \right| } \ &\check Q_{i0} = a_i s_{0} \sqrt{2g h_i }, i = 1,2,3 \end{split} \end{equation} $$
The collected training and testing data sets can be describled as
[train].mat -> normal (16008 × 5)
model1[train].mat -> fault01 (2001 × 5), ..., fault12 (2001 × 5)
QQ Group:640571839
[1] Z. Pan, H. Chen, Y. Wang, B. Huang, and W. Gui, "A new perspective on ae-and vae-based process monitoring," TechRxiv, Apr. 2022, doi.10.36227/techrxiv.19617534.
[2] S. X. Ding, "Data-driven design of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control systems," London, U.K.: Springer, 2014.
[3] Z. Pan, Y. Wang, k. Wang, G. Ran, H. Chen, and W. Gui, "Layer-Wise Contribution-Filtered Propagation for Deep Learning-Based Fault Isolation," Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, Jul. 2022, doi.10.1002/rnc.6328
[4] Z. Pan, Y. Wang, K. Wang, H. Chen, C. Yang, and W. Gui, "Imputation of Missing Values in Time Series Using an Adaptive-Learned Median-Filled Deep Autoencoder," IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2022, doi.10.1109/TCYB.2022.3167995
[5] Y. Wang, Z. Pan, X. Yuan, C. Yang, and W. Gui, "A novel deep learning based fault diagnosis approach for chemical process with extended deep belief network," ISA Trans., vol. 96, pp. 457–467, 2020.
[6] Z. Pan, Y. Wang, X. Yuan, C. Yang, and W. Gui, "A classification-driven neuron-grouped sae for feature representation and its application to fault
classification in chemical processes," Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 230, p. 107350, 2021.