fix: revert changes for the field edge detection #3543
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The attempt to better detect boundaries between fields very close together resulted in zigzagged field edges and currently we don't have a good way to straighten them out. Therefore, revert the field scanner change, it is better sometimes not correctly detecting fields when they are very close together than often generate zigzagged headlands.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The attempt to better detect boundaries between fields very close together resulted in zigzagged field edges and currently we don't have a good way to straighten them out.
Therefore, revert the field scanner change, it is better sometimes not correctly detecting fields when they are very close together than often generate zigzagged
headlands.
#3540