Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Compute extension_radial posterior directly and use this for parameter estimates, as opposed to using extension+ellipticity summary statistics #99

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2024
Merged

Compute extension_radial posterior directly and use this for parameter estimates, as opposed to using extension+ellipticity summary statistics #99

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2024

Commits on Apr 16, 2024

  1. Update stats.py to include extension_radial parameter in supplement() 

    Part 1 of an improvement to use the full posterior when calculating the azimuthally-averaged (radial) extension.

This fix specifically adds extension_radial to the class method supplement(), part of the Samples class
    @willcerny
    willcerny authored Apr 16, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    65bf152 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. Update results.py to use new extension_radial field of samples to com… 

    …pute extension_radial estimate

Part 2 of an improvement to use the full posterior of the extension and ellipticity to derive extension_radial samples, then compute summary statistics on extension_radial.
    @willcerny
    willcerny authored Apr 16, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    0a76a7e View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history