Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release lading 0.23.5 #1090

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

Release lading 0.23.5 #1090

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

blt
Copy link
Collaborator

@blt blt commented Nov 4, 2024

What does this PR do?

This commit addresses a bug in the lading target mechanism. In some cases pid 0 would be reported by docker as the pid of the watched container. We also now scope our release down to only the container artifact.

This commit addresses a bug in the lading target mechanism. In some cases
pid 0 would be reported by docker as the pid of the watched container. We
also now scope our release down to only the container artifact.

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <[email protected]>
@blt blt requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2024 20:29
@blt blt merged commit e0ed8d7 into main Nov 5, 2024
17 checks passed
@blt blt deleted the blt/lading_0235 branch November 5, 2024 00:56
blt added a commit to DataDog/datadog-agent that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
This commit updates the file_to_blackhole experiments to rely on the lading
logrotate FS generator, allowing us to assert on whether the log Agent loses
bytes in the course of its operation. I've added a new check asserting that no
bytes are lost, although I do not expect this to pass on higher latency intake
experiments yet.

REF #30744
REF DataDog/lading#1090

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <[email protected]>
blt added a commit to DataDog/datadog-agent that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
This commit updates the file_to_blackhole experiments to rely on the lading
logrotate FS generator, allowing us to assert on whether the log Agent loses
bytes in the course of its operation. I've added a new check asserting that no
bytes are lost, although I do not expect this to pass on higher latency intake
experiments yet.

REF #30744
REF DataDog/lading#1090

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <[email protected]>
blt added a commit to DataDog/datadog-agent that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
This commit updates the file_to_blackhole experiments to rely on the lading
logrotate FS generator, allowing us to assert on whether the log Agent loses
bytes in the course of its operation. I've added a new check asserting that no
bytes are lost, although I do not expect this to pass on higher latency intake
experiments yet.

REF #30744
REF DataDog/lading#1090

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <[email protected]>
blt added a commit to DataDog/datadog-agent that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
This commit updates the file_to_blackhole experiments to rely on the lading
logrotate FS generator, allowing us to assert on whether the log Agent loses
bytes in the course of its operation. I've added a new check asserting that no
bytes are lost, although I do not expect this to pass on higher latency intake
experiments yet.

REF #30744
REF DataDog/lading#1090

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants