Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing pop_begin/pop_end for mapping types #1173

Merged

Conversation

ggiraldez
Copy link
Contributor

@ggiraldez ggiraldez commented Nov 28, 2024

I found this additional required fix after merging #1159. This is so bindings can be processed for files with using directives on mapping types without crashing. We want to merge this before #1149 to get a meaningful baseline before those fixes are applied.

This is so bindings can be processed for files with using directives on mapping
types without crashing.
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 28, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f4961a7

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@ggiraldez ggiraldez marked this pull request as ready for review November 29, 2024 20:02
@ggiraldez ggiraldez requested review from a team as code owners November 29, 2024 20:02
@@ -850,6 +852,10 @@ inherit .lexical_scope

; resolve the value type through our scope
edge @value_type.type_ref -> @mapping.lexical_scope

; We use the value_type's definition path as our, although that's not correct
Copy link
Collaborator

@OmarTawfik OmarTawfik Dec 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: missing part of the docs: "as our"?

@ggiraldez ggiraldez added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into NomicFoundation:main with commit c327122 Dec 2, 2024
1 check passed
@ggiraldez ggiraldez deleted the fix-sanctuary-with-bindings branch December 2, 2024 20:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants