modules/visuals: update indent-blankline to v3 #154
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Blocked by #178 |
NotAShelf
force-pushed
the
feat/bump-ibl
branch
from
0a8d67b to
0067d44
Compare
|
I think |
required to comply with highlighter changes in ibl v3
FrothyMarrow
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2023
bloxx12
pushed a commit
to bloxx12/nvf
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2024
modules/visuals: update indent-blankline to v3
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates indent-blankline to v3 and removes the workaround requiring
vim.wo.colorcolumn = "99999"- reported to be fixed upstream in neovim.I've renamed some of the module options, and I'd really like to use
lib.mkRemovedOptionModuleandlib.mkRenamedOptionModule, however, both of those cause the build system to assert the files they are defined in (wherever they are) are not actually modules.