[CORE] Use collection interface in method parameter and return type #3603
Conversation
|
Thanks for opening a pull request! Could you open an issue for this pull request on Github Issues? https://github.com/oap-project/gluten/issues Then could you also rename commit message and pull request title in the following format? See also: |
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
liujiayi771
force-pushed
the
move-arraylist
branch
from
b538196 to
acfa42b
Compare
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
1 similar comment
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
| import java.lang.{Long => JLong} | ||
| import java.util.{HashMap => JHashMap} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can this import statement be generated by some kind of tools? Or the code was manually written?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I made the modifications manually. However, upon carefully examining the code of Spark, I noticed that it actually has a lot of inconsistency in its usage. There are various conventions being used, with most of them using JList, but java.util.List and util.List are still present as well. I am now questioning whether it is necessary to make these modifications here, as it would be difficult to ensure that all future developers maintain a consistent style.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
as it would be difficult to ensure that all future developers maintain a consistent style.
Yes so it's not necessary to become a coding style or restriction. Sounds fair to me.
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
1 similar comment
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
liujiayi771
force-pushed
the
move-arraylist
branch
from
eaf3594 to
974d587
Compare
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
liujiayi771
force-pushed
the
move-arraylist
branch
from
974d587 to
064260b
Compare
liujiayi771
changed the title
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
liujiayi771
force-pushed
the
move-arraylist
branch
from
064260b to
ad0c317
Compare
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI |
|
@zhztheplayer @rui-mo It's ready for review. I have removed many unnecessary import modifications. |
|
===== Performance report for TPCH SF2000 with Velox backend, for reference only ====
|
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is recommended to use abstract interfaces for method parameters and return type instead of concrete implementations.
After modifying the method parameters and return type to abstract interface types, many codes can be rewritten in a more functional style. This PR also includes these modifications as well.
How was this patch tested?
Existing test cases