Skip to content

Issues: csu-hmc/gait-control-direct-id-paper

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

22 Open 32 Closed
22 Open 32 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Determine if the mean gains across subjects from perturbed and unperturbed are significantly different.
#54 opened May 21, 2015 by moorepants
2
Determine if the mean gains across subjects are significantly different with respect to the right and left sides.
#53 opened May 21, 2015 by moorepants
Determine if the mean gains across subjects are significantly different than those at other gait phase points.
#52 opened May 21, 2015 by moorepants
1
Find out which mean gains are significantly different than zero.
#51 opened May 21, 2015 by moorepants
2
Plot torque vs joint angle and compare it to my gain curves
#50 opened May 14, 2015 by moorepants
References that need to be checked out
#49 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
1
We should try Wang/Srinivasan's method with our data.
#48 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
6
Why white noise perturbations?
#47 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
2
It would be nice to do some kind of controller reduction
#46 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
1
Does the rubber belt affect the data
#45 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
1
Need to explain the variance accounted for better
#44 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
2
Is there any way to prove that the identified object is really a controller?
#43 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
10
Do we need more carefully computed inverse dynamics?
#42 opened May 9, 2015 by moorepants
4
Gains identified from normal walking are very similar to that of perturbed walking
#41 opened May 7, 2015 by moorepants
4
Bias due to the input and output to the controller being both computed from marker trajectories
#40 opened May 7, 2015 by moorepants
7
split_at with None for num_samples fails on trial 018 and returns only a max of 4 time samples
#39 opened Apr 15, 2015 by moorepants
Run id with only proportional gains but full gain matrix.
#29 opened Jun 3, 2014 by moorepants
Detrend the ground reaction loads based on the unloaded portions of the runs.
#25 opened May 22, 2014 by moorepants
Use the open loop control solution from Ton's project + the identified controller
#20 opened May 21, 2014 by moorepants
Should we use weighted linear least squares? question
#18 opened May 20, 2014 by moorepants
Data is not reloaded correctly
#7 opened Mar 24, 2014 by moorepants
1
Add a time delay term to the controller.
#3 opened Dec 17, 2013 by moorepants
2
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.