This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 14, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[wip] adding nwb viewer #849
[wip] adding nwb viewer #849
Changes from 3 commits
f41f523
905be7d
6050a0c
543ce34
978a951
9c617b8
d9a851c
57097cc
d5661cd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer if code was separated from registry of services, so that registry could be reused later by multiple portals.
See https://github.com/datalad/datalad-deprecated/blob/master/datalad_deprecated/resources/website/assets/js/main.js#L21 and how used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: we need to add maxsize field there and set it to eg 1GB or might be even less for bisweb. Sure to limitations extracted data must not exceed 4GB and anyways, download might be too slow etc. So I wouldn't bother exposing that service for known to fail out be problematic files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
after bioimagesuiteweb/bisweb#129 is addressed, we should also add
.tiff
into this "registry" (also with similar limits on the file size). ATM bisweb falls into "it is a nifti" if there is no file extension (as our endpoints and blob files have none), but IMHO should work whenever content-disposition is respected (where we do provide the extension)