Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refact: Optimize Rect _onValueChanged callback. #2407

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chenyunda218
Copy link
Contributor

@chenyunda218 chenyunda218 commented Oct 28, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

refactor. Performance optimization

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

Check null before call _onValueChanged. It is cpu unfriendly.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Declare private variable _onValueChangedCallback. Use setter getter to proxy the operation of _onValueChangedCallback. Just call _onValueChangedCallback.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced callback mechanism in the Rect class for more robust handling of value changes.
    • Default no-operation function provided when no user-defined callback is set.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved encapsulation and flow control for handling value change notifications.
  • Tests

    • Added multiple test cases to verify the functionality of the callback mechanism in the Rect class, ensuring correct behavior on property changes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@chenyunda218 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d49da11 and ca3f4f4.

Walkthrough

The changes made in the Rect class of packages/math/src/Rect.ts involve modifications to the _onValueChanged callback mechanism. An emptyFunc is introduced for initialization, and the _onValueChanged property is restructured into a getter and setter. The getter returns null if the callback is set to emptyFunc, while the setter assigns the callback or defaults to emptyFunc if null is passed. This enhances encapsulation and robustness in handling value changes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/math/src/Rect.ts - Added private _onValueChangedCallback: () => void = emptyFunc.
- Updated getter and setter for _onValueChanged property to handle callback assignment and defaulting. Replaced direct calls to _onValueChanged with _onValueChangedCallback in relevant methods.
tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts - Added a test case for _onValueChanged to verify callback functionality when properties change.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Rect
    participant Callback

    User->>Rect: Set callback
    Rect->>Rect: Check if callback is null
    alt Callback is null
        Rect->>Rect: Use emptyFunc
    else Callback is provided
        Rect->>Callback: Execute provided callback
    end
    Rect->>User: Callback executed
Loading

🐰 "In the land of math, where rectangles play,
A new callback dance brightens the day.
With emptyFunc ready, no worries to fret,
Encapsulation's charm, we won't soon forget!
So hop along, friends, let the values change,
In our Rect's embrace, nothing feels strange!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.52%. Comparing base (5d147ae) to head (ca3f4f4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2407      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.50%   69.52%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         522      522              
  Lines       27365    27371       +6     
  Branches     4097     4093       -4     
==========================================
+ Hits        19021    19029       +8     
+ Misses       6846     6841       -5     
- Partials     1498     1501       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 69.52% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/math/src/Rect.ts (1)

4-5: Enhance function documentation

Consider improving the comment to better explain the purpose: "Empty function used as a default no-op callback when no value change handler is set."

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8e8090 and 4cc5b86.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/math/src/Rect.ts (8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/math/src/Rect.ts

[error] 24-24: void is confusing inside a union type.

Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.

(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)

🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
packages/math/src/Rect.ts

[warning] 20-20: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests


[warning] 22-22: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests


[warning] 41-41: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L41
Added line #L41 was not covered by tests


[warning] 53-53: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests


[warning] 65-65: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L65
Added line #L65 was not covered by tests


[warning] 77-77: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L77
Added line #L77 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/math/src/Rect.ts (3)

31-31: LGTM!

The private variable declaration and initialization is well-implemented.


41-41: Add tests for value change callbacks

Multiple code paths involving _onValueChangedCallback are not covered by tests. Please add tests to verify:

  1. Callback invocation on property changes (x, y, width, height)
  2. Callback invocation on bulk updates (set, copyFrom)
  3. Null/undefined callback handling

Would you like me to help generate the test cases?

Also applies to: 53-53, 65-65, 77-77, 107-107, 129-129

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 41-41: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L41
Added line #L41 was not covered by tests


18-30: Verify performance improvement

The refactoring achieves its performance goal by:

  1. Eliminating null checks before callback invocation
  2. Using a no-op function instead of conditional execution

However, let's verify that this is actually used in performance-critical code paths.

Also applies to: 41-41, 53-53, 65-65, 77-77, 107-107, 129-129

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional scripts to find where the value change callbacks are actually used and in what context.

This will help us understand:

  1. How frequently Rect properties are modified
  2. What methods in Rect trigger value changes
  3. Where callbacks are actually invoked

Let me search for the actual property modifications and callback invocations in the Rect class.

This will help us understand the actual usage patterns of the callback within the Rect class itself.


Based on the gathered evidence, I can now generate the final response:

Performance optimization is justified

The callback optimization is well-placed because:

  1. The _onValueChangedCallback is invoked frequently - 6 different places in the Rect class trigger it
  2. Rect objects are used extensively throughout the codebase, particularly in performance-sensitive components like:
    • Sprite rendering and animation
    • Camera viewport calculations
    • UI layout and text rendering
    • Physics collision detection

Using an empty function instead of null checks eliminates branching in these hot paths, which is a meaningful optimization given the frequency of updates and the number of Rect instances in typical scenes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find usage patterns of Rect in the codebase
rg "new Rect\(" --type ts -A 2
# Find value change callback usage
ast-grep --pattern "._onValueChanged = "

Length of output: 6929


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find where Rect properties are modified
rg "\.(x|y|width|height)\s*=" --type ts -A 2

# Find all methods in Rect class that might trigger value changes
ast-grep --pattern 'class Rect {
  $$$
  set($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Look for direct property assignments that might trigger callbacks
ast-grep --pattern '$_._onValueChangedCallback('

Length of output: 48959


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find where Rect properties are modified in the Rect class itself
rg "this\.(x|y|width|height)\s*=" packages/math/src/Rect.ts

# Find all methods in Rect class that might trigger value changes
ast-grep --pattern 'class Rect {
  $$$
  set($_, $_, $_, $_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Look for value change callback invocations in Rect
rg "_onValueChangedCallback" packages/math/src/Rect.ts

Length of output: 733

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 24-24: void is confusing inside a union type.

Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.

(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)

🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 20-20: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests


[warning] 22-22: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L22
Added line #L22 was not covered by tests

packages/math/src/Rect.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/math/src/Rect.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts (1)

47-47: Add missing semicolon for consistency.

-    a._onValueChanged = null
+    a._onValueChanged = null;
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 47-47: Insert ;

(prettier/prettier)

packages/math/src/Rect.ts (2)

4-5: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.

The empty function declaration is well-placed and correctly typed.

Consider expanding the documentation to explain the performance optimization:

-// Empty function for initialization of _onValueChangedCallback .
+/**
+ * Empty function used as default callback to optimize performance by avoiding null checks
+ * during _onValueChanged invocations.
+ * @internal
+ */

18-31: Well-implemented callback optimization pattern!

The implementation effectively optimizes performance by:

  1. Using a default callback instead of null checks
  2. Maintaining backward compatibility by returning null in the getter when default is set
  3. Properly encapsulating the callback handling

This pattern is particularly effective for high-frequency callback invocations. Consider documenting this pattern in your team's best practices guide for similar performance-critical scenarios.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 24-24: void is confusing inside a union type.

Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.

(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4cc5b86 and f70bd8c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/math/src/Rect.ts (8 hunks)
  • tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/math/src/Rect.ts

[error] 24-24: void is confusing inside a union type.

Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.

(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)

🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
packages/math/src/Rect.ts

[warning] 77-77: packages/math/src/Rect.ts#L77
Added line #L77 was not covered by tests

🪛 eslint
tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts

[error] 47-47: Insert ;

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/math/src/Rect.ts (1)

41-41: Verify test coverage for property setters.

The callback invocations are consistently updated across all setters and methods. However, static analysis indicates that the height setter's callback invocation lacks test coverage.

Would you like me to help generate additional test cases to cover the height setter callback?

Also applies to: 53-53, 65-65, 77-77, 107-107, 129-129

tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts (1)

65-78: Add missing semicolon

The test logic is good, but there's a missing semicolon.

-a.y = 2
+a.y = 2;
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 75-75: Insert ;

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f70bd8c and d49da11.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts

[error] 75-75: Insert ;

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts (2)

33-50: Add missing semicolons and expand test coverage

The test verifies basic functionality but should be expanded to cover edge cases as mentioned in the previous review.

Fix missing semicolons:

-a._onValueChanged = _onValueChanged
+a._onValueChanged = _onValueChanged;
-a._onValueChanged = null
+a._onValueChanged = null;

51-64: LGTM!

The test thoroughly verifies that x property changes trigger the callback and maintains the expected value.

tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/src/math/Rect.test.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant