-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🔧 Added additional health check configuration #307
🔧 Added additional health check configuration #307
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new configurations in two Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Gateway
participant S3Integration
User->>Gateway: Request Application Health
Gateway->>Gateway: Check livenessstate.enabled
Gateway->>Gateway: Check readinessstate.enabled
Gateway->>S3Integration: Request Health Info
S3Integration-->>Gateway: Return Health Info
Gateway-->>User: Return Application Health Status
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
(1 hunks)refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml (2)
37-41
: LGTM! Health probe configuration follows best practices
The configuration properly enables both liveness and readiness probes, which is essential for container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. These probes are already included in the endpoints exposure list above.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the complete configuration of these files to ensure the health probes are properly configured in both locations.
Health probe configuration is properly implemented across services
The verification confirms that both the S3 integration service and the gateway have correctly configured health probes:
- Both services expose health endpoints including
livenessstate
andreadinessstate
- Both have the probes explicitly enabled in their configurations
- The gateway additionally has
probes.enabled: true
which enhances Spring Boot's Kubernetes support - The endpoints are properly exposed through the web exposure configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the probes are consistently configured across all application configuration files
rg "livenessstate|readinessstate" --type yaml
Length of output: 729
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete health probe configuration in both files
echo "=== refarch-s3-integration application.yml ==="
cat refarch-integrations/refarch-s3-integration/refarch-s3-integration-rest/refarch-s3-integration-rest-service/src/main/resources/application.yml
echo -e "\n=== refarch-gateway application.yml ==="
cat refarch-gateway/src/main/resources/application.yml
Length of output: 2828
34-36
: Review environment information exposure
Enabling environment information exposure (info.env.enabled: true
) could potentially expose sensitive information. Consider implementing an environment information contributor to control exactly what information is exposed.
✅ Verification successful
Environment information exposure is properly configured
The configuration is safe as it only exposes standard Spring Boot info contributors with basic application metadata:
- Application info: name, version, and description from project properties
- Build info: Java version and Spring Cloud version
- No sensitive environment variables or system properties are exposed
The info.env.enabled: true
setting is part of a standard Spring Boot Actuator configuration that follows best practices, with proper access restrictions:
- Endpoints are explicitly enabled with
enabled-by-default: false
- Info endpoint has
read_only
access level - Only specific endpoints are exposed via web
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any custom environment contributors defined
rg -l "InfoContributor|EnvironmentEndpointAutoConfiguration"
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for info endpoint configuration and custom contributors
rg -i "info\." --type yaml
Length of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any custom configuration classes that might handle info endpoint
rg -l "class.*Info.*Config|@Bean.*Info"
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Spring Boot configuration properties files for info endpoint settings
fd "application.properties|application.yml|bootstrap.properties|bootstrap.yml" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 2539
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
Reference
Issues #306
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes