feat: UX improvements #1760
feat: UX improvements #1760
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifying several components to replace the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx (1)
28-30: Consider enhancing button accessibility.While the change to
Linkis good, consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility when mixing links and buttons.- <Link to={"/resolver"}> + <Link to={"/resolver"} role="button" aria-label="Create a new case"> <Button small Icon={Bookmark} text="Create a Case" /> </Link>web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeListView.tsx (1)
60-70: Improve URL construction robustnessWhile the implementation is functionally correct, the URL construction could be more robust to handle edge cases.
Consider this improvement:
- <Link to={`/cases/${props?.disputeID?.toString()}`}> + <Link to={`/cases/${props.disputeID?.toString() ?? ''}`}>This change:
- Uses the non-optional chaining for
props.disputeIDsince it's already defined in the interface- Provides a fallback empty string in case
disputeIDis undefined, preventing "/cases/undefined" URLsweb/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx (1)
62-64: Consider extracting route path as a constantThe implementation correctly uses Link for declarative navigation. However, the hardcoded "/resolver" path could be maintained as a constant for better maintainability.
Consider creating a routes constant file:
// constants/routes.ts export const ROUTES = { RESOLVER: '/resolver', // ... other routes } as const;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeListView.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx (1)
28-30: LGTM! Verify the route exists.
The change from programmatic navigation to declarative routing using Link is a good improvement. However, let's verify that the "/resolver" route is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have found clear evidence that the "/resolver" route exists and is properly configured in the codebase:
The "/resolver" route is properly configured and actively used
The route is well-established in the codebase:
- Defined in the app router:
web/src/app.tsxwith path="resolver/*" - Used consistently across multiple components for navigation
- Has a complete flow with sub-routes like title, description, court, etc.
- Multiple components are already using this route for navigation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and configuration of the "/resolver" route
# Expected: Find route definition for "/resolver"
# Search for route definitions
rg -A 3 "path.*[\"']\/resolver[\"']"
# Search for potential typos in route path
rg -A 3 "resolver"
Length of output: 31129
web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement is correctly added
The addition of the Link import from react-router-dom is appropriate for the implementation.
59-59: Verify hover state accessibility
The hover prop on StyledCard should ensure proper focus indicators for keyboard navigation when wrapped in a Link.
web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeListView.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM!
The addition of the Link import aligns with the PR objective of using declarative routing.
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Clean import addition
The Link import is correctly added alongside the existing useLocation import from react-router-dom.
62-64: Verify styling and accessibility of Link+Button combination
Please ensure that:
- The button's hover states and styling work correctly with the Link wrapper
- The component maintains proper accessibility
✅ Verification successful
Link and StyledButton combination is properly implemented
The code review shows that:
- The
StyledButtonis a styled component that extends from@kleros/ui-components-library's Button component, which ensures proper button styling and behavior. - The pattern of wrapping a
StyledButtonwith aLinkcomponent is consistent with other implementations in the codebase, particularly in navigation scenarios. - The button implementation includes proper text and icon props, maintaining the UI component library's accessibility standards.
- The hover states are handled through the base Button component from the UI library.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar Link+Button patterns in the codebase for consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'Link { $$$
<$_Button $$$/>
}'
# Check for any existing accessibility patterns
rg -l 'aria-|role=' web/src/components/
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar Link+Button patterns with a more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern '<Link $$$>
$$$Button$$$
</Link>'
# Check for StyledButton usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern '<StyledButton $$$>'
# Check for accessibility attributes in the components directory
rg -i 'aria-|role=' web/src/components/
# Check the StyledButton component implementation
fd -e tsx -e ts StyledButton
Length of output: 889
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the StyledButton component implementation
fd StyledButton --type f --exec cat {}
# Check for any existing button-related accessibility patterns
rg -A 3 -B 3 'button|Button' web/src/components/
# Look for styled-components button implementations
rg -l 'styled\(.+button|Button' web/src/components/
Length of output: 20391
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
36-54: Consider optimizing data fetching strategy.The component uses multiple data fetching hooks (
usePopulatedDisputeData,useDisputeDetailsQuery,useCourtPolicy,useVotingHistory). Consider implementing a combined query or data fetching strategy to reduce the number of network requests.Consider these optimization strategies:
- Implement data prefetching at the route level
- Combine related queries where possible
- Add loading states to handle data fetching gracefully
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx (3)
1-1: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized.
The new imports are correctly placed and necessary for the scroll functionality implementation.
Also applies to: 9-9
44-44: LGTM! Hook usage follows React best practices.
The useScrollTop hook is correctly initialized at the component level.
51-53: Consider improving the scroll behavior implementation.
While the implementation works, there are a few considerations:
- The effect might trigger unnecessarily if the
scrollTopfunction reference changes. - Consider adding a cleanup function to handle any necessary scroll position cleanup.
- The automatic scroll behavior might interfere with the user's manual scrolling preferences.
Let's verify the scroll behavior implementation across the codebase:
Consider this improved implementation:
useEffect(() => {
+ // Prevent scroll manipulation if user has already scrolled
+ if (window.scrollY > 0) return;
scrollTop();
+ return () => {
+ // Cleanup logic if needed
+ };
}, [scrollTop]);✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
The scroll behavior implementation is appropriate for its use case
The implementation is actually well-designed because:
- The
scrollTopfunction is using an overlay scroll context and properly handles viewport scrolling throughosInstance(). - There are no conflicting scroll behaviors in the codebase - other scroll implementations (
scrollIntoView) are used for different purposes in separate components. - A cleanup function isn't necessary here since:
- The scroll operation is a one-time action
- The implementation uses a controlled overlay scroll instance
- There's no persistent state or event listeners that need cleanup
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other scroll management implementations and potential conflicts
# Look for other useScrollTop implementations
echo "Checking for useScrollTop implementations:"
rg -A 5 "useScrollTop"
# Look for other scroll management code
echo "Checking for other scroll management code:"
rg -A 5 "scroll(To|Top|Into)"
# Look for the custom hook implementation
echo "Checking useScrollTop hook implementation:"
fd -e ts -e tsx useScrollTop.ts
Length of output: 7786
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (2)
47-47: Consider enhancing scroll behavior based on navigation contextThe current implementation scrolls to top only on component mount. Consider these improvements:
- Add relevant dependencies to the
useEffectto handle updates to case details- Preserve scroll position when switching between tabs
- Add scroll behavior when navigating between different cases
Here's a suggested implementation:
const CaseDetails: React.FC = () => { const { id } = useParams(); const { data } = useDisputeDetailsQuery(id); const scrollTop = useScrollTop(); const dispute = data?.dispute; const currentPeriodIndex = (dispute ? Periods[dispute.period] : 0) as number; const arbitrable = dispute?.arbitrated.id as `0x${string}`; useEffect(() => { scrollTop(); - }, []); + }, [id]); // Scroll to top when case ID changesAlso applies to: 52-54
Line range hint
41-46: Enhance type safety for route parametersConsider adding proper type definitions for the route parameters to improve type safety.
Here's a suggested implementation:
interface RouteParams { id: string; } const CaseDetails: React.FC = () => { const { id } = useParams<keyof RouteParams>(); // ... rest of the code
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statements are properly organized
The new imports for useEffect and useScrollTop are correctly placed and organized.
Also applies to: 10-10
kemuru
dismissed stale reviews from Harman-singh-waraich and coderabbitai[bot]
via
12f1370
kemuru
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/CourtCard/CourtName.tsx (1)
Line range hint
31-41: Consider adding hover and focus statesWhile the styled Link component is well-structured, it could benefit from additional interactive states for better user experience.
Consider adding these styles:
const StyledLink = styled(Link)` display: flex; gap: 8px; align-items: center; + text-decoration: none; + &:hover, &:focus { + text-decoration: underline; + opacity: 0.9; + } > svg { height: 15px; width: 15px; path { fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryBlue}; } } `;web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx (1)
30-34: Consider conditional scroll reset based on navigation sourceWhile the scroll reset implementation is functional, consider making it more flexible by conditionally resetting the scroll position based on the navigation source or previous route. This could prevent unnecessary scroll resets when users navigate back from nested routes.
Example approach:
-useEffect(() => { - scrollTop(); -}, []); +import { useLocation } from 'react-router-dom'; + +const location = useLocation(); +useEffect(() => { + // Only reset scroll if coming from outside the cases section + if (!location.state?.preserveScroll) { + scrollTop(); + } +}, [location]);web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx (1)
45-49: Consider adding a comment to document the scroll behavior.While the implementation is correct, adding a brief comment would help explain why we're resetting the scroll position on mount.
const scrollTop = useScrollTop(); + // Reset scroll position when attachment display is mounted useEffect(() => { scrollTop(); }, []);web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx (1)
74-76: Consider adding route parameters to useEffect dependenciesThe current implementation only resets scroll position on component mount. Consider adding route parameters (page, order, filter) to the dependency array to ensure scroll reset when these parameters change.
useEffect(() => { scrollTop(); - }, []); + }, [page, order, filter, scrollTop]);web/src/pages/Cases/CasesFetcher.tsx (1)
51-51: Consider handling scroll behavior at the router level.While the current implementation works, managing scroll position at the component level might lead to inconsistent behavior across the application. Consider these architectural improvements:
- Move scroll management to a router-level solution to handle it consistently across all route changes
- Consider preserving scroll position when users navigate back using the browser's history
Example router-level implementation:
// ScrollToTopRouter.tsx import { useEffect } from 'react'; import { useLocation } from 'react-router-dom'; export function ScrollToTopRouter({ children }) { const location = useLocation(); useEffect(() => { // Only scroll to top on forward navigation if (window.history.state?.type !== 'POP') { window.scrollTo(0, 0); } }, [location]); return children; }Also applies to: 74-76
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (1)
100-102: Consider additional scroll reset triggers.The current implementation correctly resets scroll position on component mount. However, consider if there are specific state or prop changes that should also trigger a scroll reset (e.g., when the court ID changes).
You could enhance the scroll behavior by adding relevant dependencies:
useEffect(() => { scrollTop(); - }, []); + }, [id]); // Reset scroll when court ID changesweb/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx (1)
82-82: Consider triggering scroll on route changes.While the current implementation correctly scrolls to top on component mount, consider also triggering the scroll when the route changes within the component. This would ensure a better user experience when navigating between different steps of the dispute resolver form.
useEffect(() => { scrollTop(); - }, []); + }, [location.pathname]);Also applies to: 85-87
web/src/pages/Settings/EmailConfirmation/index.tsx (1)
161-163: Consider coordinating scroll behavior with confirmation stateThe scroll effect currently runs on mount, but it might be more user-friendly to reset the scroll position after the confirmation process completes.
Consider updating the effect to include relevant state changes:
useEffect(() => { scrollTop(); - }, []); + }, [isConfirming]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
web/src/components/Field.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CasesFetcher.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/CourtCard/CourtName.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Settings/EmailConfirmation/index.tsx(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/components/Field.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (18)
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/CourtCard/CourtName.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import of Link component
The addition of the Link import aligns with the PR's objective of using declarative routing.
53-55: Verify router configuration for court details path
The Link implementation looks good, but let's ensure the path pattern /courts/${id} matches the router configuration.
✅ Verification successful
URL pattern /courts/${id} matches router configuration
The router configuration shows a wildcard path courts/* which correctly matches the URL pattern /courts/${id} used in the link component. The implementation is valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for router configuration to verify the path pattern
rg -A 5 "path.*courts/:\?id"
Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for router configuration with broader pattern
rg -A 5 "path.*courts.*"
# Also search for route definitions using ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'Route { path: $_, $$$}'
# Search for router setup in common locations
fd "router|routes" --type f
Length of output: 131540
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for route configuration in app.tsx and other potential router files
rg -A 5 "Route.*path.*" web/src/app.tsx
# Also search for router setup in app.tsx
rg -A 10 "createBrowserRouter|RouterProvider" web/src/app.tsx
Length of output: 649
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for courts route configuration specifically
rg -A 10 "courts.*path|path.*courts" web/src/app.tsx
# Also search for any route definitions in the Courts directory
rg -A 5 "Route.*path" web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/
Length of output: 617
web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.
The new imports for useEffect and useScrollTop are correctly placed and follow a logical ordering pattern.
Also applies to: 8-8
33-37: Consider adding cleanup and dependency array refinements.
The scroll-to-top implementation is functional but could be enhanced:
- Consider if cleanup is needed on component unmount
- Verify if
scrollTopshould be included in the dependency array
Let's verify the useScrollTop hook implementation:
web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized
The imports are logically grouped and follow React best practices.
Also applies to: 5-5
30-34: Verify consistent scroll behavior across components
Let's verify that the scroll reset behavior is implemented consistently across all components mentioned in the summary.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the actual usage patterns since the first AST pattern might have been too strict.
Scroll behavior is consistently implemented across components
The verification shows that useScrollTop is consistently implemented across all mentioned components and even more:
- All components properly import
useScrollTopfrom the hooks directory - Components like Home, Resolver, GetPnk, and AttachmentDisplay follow the exact same pattern of calling
scrollTop()in auseEffectwith empty dependencies - Other components (Dashboard, CaseDetails, etc.) have the hook imported and available for use when needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent implementation of useScrollTop across components
# Expected: Similar useEffect + useScrollTop pattern in all mentioned components
# Search for useScrollTop import
echo "Checking useScrollTop imports:"
rg "import.*useScrollTop.*from.*hooks/useScrollTop"
# Search for useScrollTop usage pattern
echo -e "\nChecking useScrollTop implementation pattern:"
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = useScrollTop();
useEffect(() => {
$$$
}, $_);'
Length of output: 1127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for useScrollTop usage with more context
echo "Checking useScrollTop usage patterns:"
rg "const.*useScrollTop" -A 5
# Also search for direct useScrollTop calls
echo -e "\nChecking direct useScrollTop calls:"
rg "useScrollTop\(\)" -A 5
Length of output: 7936
web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import changes are well-organized.
The new imports are properly grouped and follow consistent ordering conventions.
Also applies to: 6-6
45-49: Verify consistent scroll behavior implementation across components.
Let's ensure this scroll behavior implementation is consistent with other components mentioned in the PR.
✅ Verification successful
Scroll behavior implementation is consistent across components
The implementation in AttachmentDisplay matches the pattern used across other components in the codebase. All components:
- Import useScrollTop from the same hook
- Initialize it with
const scrollTop = useScrollTop() - Use it within useEffect when scroll reset is needed
The hook itself provides a consistent scrolling behavior using OverlayScrollContext across the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent scroll behavior implementation across components
# Expected: Similar useEffect + useScrollTop pattern in other components
# Search for similar scroll behavior implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => {
$$$scrollTop$$$
}, []);'
# Check if all mentioned components use useScrollTop
rg -l "useScrollTop" "web/src/pages/(CaseDetails|CasesFetcher|CourtDetails|Dashboard|GetPnk|Home|Resolver|EmailConfirmation)"
Length of output: 335
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for scroll behavior implementations
# First, find all components in the web/src/pages directory
fd . "web/src/pages" -t f -e tsx -e ts | xargs rg -l "useScrollTop"
# Then, let's look for useEffect implementations with scrollTop
rg "useEffect.*scrollTop.*\[\]" "web/src/pages" -A 2
# Also check the actual useScrollTop hook implementation
fd "useScrollTop" "web/src" -t f
Length of output: 528
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation in each file that uses useScrollTop
# Check the implementation pattern in each file
for file in $(fd . web/src/pages -t f -e tsx -e ts | xargs rg -l "useScrollTop"); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "useScrollTop|useEffect.*scrollTop" "$file" -B 1 -A 3
done
# Also check the hook implementation
cat web/src/hooks/useScrollTop.ts
Length of output: 5998
web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.
The addition of useScrollTop import and existing useEffect import are correctly placed and align with the new scroll behavior implementation.
Also applies to: 10-10
54-54: Verify useScrollTop hook implementation
While the hook initialization is correct, let's verify the implementation of useScrollTop to ensure it's stable across re-renders.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have found and analyzed the implementation of the useScrollTop hook.
The useScrollTop hook implementation is stable and correctly implemented
The hook follows React best practices:
- Returns a memoized scroll function that uses a ref from context
- No cleanup needed as it only uses context and doesn't set up any subscriptions
- Properly handles optional chaining for the ref access
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for useScrollTop hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const useScrollTop = () => {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any potential memory leaks or cleanup needs
rg -A 5 "useScrollTop.*=.*{"
Length of output: 721
web/src/pages/Cases/CasesFetcher.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized.
The new imports for useEffect and useScrollTop are properly organized and follow the established import order pattern.
Also applies to: 6-6
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import changes are well-organized.
The new imports for useEffect and useScrollTop are properly organized and necessary for the scroll functionality.
Also applies to: 12-12
88-88: LGTM! Hook initialization follows React conventions.
The useScrollTop hook is properly initialized alongside other hooks, maintaining good code organization.
web/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.
The new imports for useEffect and useScrollTop are correctly placed and necessary for implementing the scroll-to-top functionality.
Also applies to: 11-11
82-87: Verify consistent scroll behavior across form steps.
Let's ensure that the scroll implementation is consistent with other components and works correctly for all form steps.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check for the useScrollTop hook implementation and its usage pattern:
The previous results show consistent usage across components, but we need to verify the hook's implementation and check if there are any form step components in the Resolver directory that might need similar scroll behavior.
Scroll behavior implementation is consistent across components
The verification shows that:
- The
useScrollTophook is consistently implemented across the application using the same pattern - All major page components, including form steps in the Resolver directory, use the same scroll behavior implementation
- The hook is properly exported from a central location (
web/src/hooks/useScrollTop.ts) and uses the overlay scroll context
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check scroll behavior implementation across components
# Expected: Find similar useScrollTop implementations in related components
# Check for similar scroll implementations in form step components
echo "Checking form step components..."
rg -l "useScrollTop" "web/src/pages/Resolver/.*/"
# Check the pattern of useEffect with scrollTop across the codebase
echo "Checking useEffect patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => { scrollTop(); }, $_)'
Length of output: 1880
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation and exports of useScrollTop hook
echo "Checking useScrollTop implementation..."
rg -A 5 "export.*useScrollTop"
# Check if there are any other scroll-related hooks or patterns
echo "Checking other scroll patterns..."
rg -l "scroll.*top|scrollTo"
# Check for any form step components in Resolver directory
echo "Checking Resolver directory structure..."
fd . "web/src/pages/Resolver"
Length of output: 2423
web/src/pages/Settings/EmailConfirmation/index.tsx (3)
9-9: LGTM: Consistent hook implementation
The addition of useScrollTop hook follows the pattern implemented across other components in this PR, maintaining consistency in scroll management.
Also applies to: 143-143
Line range hint 141-150: LGTM: Well-structured state management
The component's state management is clean and well-organized, with clear separation of concerns for different confirmation states and proper parameter validation.
Line range hint 174-196: LGTM: Clean and maintainable UI implementation
The UI rendering logic is well-structured with:
- Clear conditional rendering
- Good separation of concerns
- Maintainable message configuration
jaybuidl
added
Type: Enhancement ✨
Package: Web
kemuru
dismissed stale reviews from alcercu and coderabbitai[bot]
via
0596e7f
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 8437b2e and detected 0 issues on this pull request. View more on Code Climate. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/components/ScrollTop.tsx (2)
12-12: Consider using null instead of empty fragmentWhen a component doesn't render anything, returning
nullis more idiomatic than an empty fragment.- return <></>; + return null;
5-13: Add cleanup to prevent potential memory leaksThe scroll behavior might be interrupted if the component unmounts during the scroll animation. Consider adding a cleanup function.
const ScrollTop: React.FC = () => { const scrollTop = useScrollTop(); useEffect(() => { + let mounted = true; - scrollTop(); + if (mounted) { + scrollTop(); + } + return () => { + mounted = false; + }; }, [scrollTop]); return null; };web/src/pages/Cases/CasesFetcher.tsx (1)
84-84: Consider memoizing ScrollTop for performanceSince CasesDisplay may trigger re-renders due to its dynamic data, consider memoizing the ScrollTop component to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
- <ScrollTop /> + {useMemo(() => <ScrollTop />, [])}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
web/src/components/ScrollTop.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CasesFetcher.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Settings/EmailConfirmation/index.tsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Resolver/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Settings/EmailConfirmation/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
web/src/components/ScrollTop.tsx (2)
1-14: Verify ScrollTop implementation across routes
The component is being used across multiple pages. Let's verify its implementation to ensure consistent behavior.
✅ Verification successful
ScrollTop component is consistently implemented across all routes
The verification shows that the ScrollTop component is properly imported and consistently implemented across all pages:
- All imports correctly reference the component from "components/ScrollTop"
- The component is consistently rendered at the end of each page's JSX
- Implementation pattern is uniform across all 9 pages where it's used
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check ScrollTop usage across components
# Expected: ScrollTop is properly imported and used in all mentioned components
# Check for ScrollTop imports
echo "Checking ScrollTop imports..."
rg -l "import.*ScrollTop.*from.*components/ScrollTop" web/src/pages/
# Check implementation pattern
echo "\nChecking implementation patterns..."
rg -A 3 "ScrollTop" web/src/pages/
Length of output: 4842
3-3: Verify useScrollTop hook implementation
Let's check the implementation of the useScrollTop hook since it's crucial for this component's functionality.
✅ Verification successful
useScrollTop hook implementation verified and properly integrated
The hook implementation is correct and well-integrated into the application's scroll management system:
- Uses React's
useContextto access theOverlayScrollContextwhich is properly set up in the layout - Implements a clean scrollTop function that uses the overlay scroll instance to scroll to top (0)
- Works in conjunction with other scroll-related hooks (useNavigateAndScrollTop, useLockOverlayScroll) in a consistent manner
- Properly integrated with the OverlayScrollbarsComponent in the layout
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine useScrollTop hook implementation
# Expected: Hook properly handles scroll behavior
echo "Checking useScrollTop hook implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const useScrollTop = () => {
$$$
}'
# Check for any other scroll-related utilities
echo "\nChecking for other scroll-related utilities..."
rg -l "scroll" web/src/hooks/
Length of output: 935
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of useNavigateAndScrollTop since it might be related
ast-grep --pattern 'export const useNavigateAndScrollTop = $$$'
# Also check the context where OverlayScrollContext is defined
rg -A 5 "OverlayScrollContext" --type ts
# Check for any imports in useScrollTop.ts
rg "import.*from" web/src/hooks/useScrollTop.ts
Length of output: 4199
web/src/pages/Cases/CasesFetcher.tsx (3)
16-16: LGTM! Import statement is properly placed
The ScrollTop component import follows the project's import organization pattern, aligning with the PR's UX improvement objectives.
74-85: LGTM! Component structure follows React best practices
The Fragment usage and ScrollTop component placement are appropriate for the intended functionality.
74-85: Verify consistent ScrollTop implementation across components
Let's verify that the ScrollTop implementation is consistent across all components mentioned in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
ScrollTop implementation is consistent across all components
The verification shows that ScrollTop is consistently implemented across all mentioned components in the PR objectives. All nine components (EmailConfirmation, Resolver, Dashboard, Home, GetPnk, CourtDetails, CasesFetcher, AttachmentDisplay, and CaseDetails) use the same simple implementation pattern of <ScrollTop /> as a self-closing component at the end of their respective containers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check ScrollTop implementation consistency across components
# Search for ScrollTop imports and usage in mentioned components
echo "Checking ScrollTop implementation in components..."
rg -l "ScrollTop" "web/src/pages/(Settings/EmailConfirmation|Cases/(CaseDetails|AttachmentDisplay)|Dashboard|Resolver|Courts/CourtDetails|GetPnk|Home)"
# Verify the implementation pattern
echo "Checking implementation pattern..."
rg -A 5 "<ScrollTop" "web/src/pages/(Settings/EmailConfirmation|Cases/(CaseDetails|AttachmentDisplay)|Dashboard|Resolver|Courts/CourtDetails|GetPnk|Home)"
Length of output: 842
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find ScrollTop implementations
# First, let's find all files that contain ScrollTop
echo "Files containing ScrollTop:"
rg -l "ScrollTop" web/src/pages/
# Then, let's see the implementation patterns
echo -e "\nImplementation patterns:"
rg -A 5 "<ScrollTop" web/src/pages/
Length of output: 3272
PR-Codex overview
This PR introduces the
ScrollTopcomponent, which is designed to reset the scroll position to the top of the page. It is integrated into various components and pages throughout the application, enhancing user experience by ensuring smooth navigation.Detailed summary
ScrollTopcomponent inweb/src/components/ScrollTop.tsx.ScrollTopin multiple pages:EmailConfirmationCaseDetailsDashboardResolverCourtDetailsAttachmentDisplayGetPnkHomeCasesFetcheruseScrollTopfunction fromFieldcomponent.DisputeCardViewandDisputeListViewto useLinkfromreact-router-dom.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
These updates enhance user experience by streamlining navigation and ensuring a smoother transition between views.