chore: nitpick space in v2 beta disputes #1790
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx (1)
68-81: Simplify the conditional rendering and optimize trim() callsWhile the whitespace handling is correct, we can improve the code's readability and performance.
Consider this refactoring:
- {!isUndefined(disputeDetails) ? ( - <> - {disputeDetails?.question?.trim() ? ( - <ReactMarkdownWrapper> - <ReactMarkdown>{disputeDetails.question}</ReactMarkdown> - </ReactMarkdownWrapper> - ) : null} - {disputeDetails?.description?.trim() ? ( - <ReactMarkdownWrapper> - <ReactMarkdown>{disputeDetails.description}</ReactMarkdown> - </ReactMarkdownWrapper> - ) : null} - </> - ) : null} + {!isUndefined(disputeDetails) && ( + // Remove fragment since we're already returning null for undefined + // Store trimmed values to avoid multiple trim() calls + <> + {(() => { + const trimmedQuestion = disputeDetails?.question?.trim(); + return trimmedQuestion && ( + <ReactMarkdownWrapper> + <ReactMarkdown>{trimmedQuestion}</ReactMarkdown> + </ReactMarkdownWrapper> + ); + })()} + {(() => { + const trimmedDescription = disputeDetails?.description?.trim(); + return trimmedDescription && ( + <ReactMarkdownWrapper> + <ReactMarkdown>{trimmedDescription}</ReactMarkdown> + </ReactMarkdownWrapper> + ); + })()} + </> + )}This refactoring:
- Uses logical AND instead of ternary for the main condition
- Stores trimmed values to avoid multiple trim() calls
- Uses short-circuit evaluation instead of ternary for inner conditions
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 8c480ed and detected 2 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on improving the rendering logic of
disputeDetailsin theDisputeContextcomponent by ensuring that thequestionanddescriptionare only displayed if they contain trimmed content.Detailed summary
disputeDetails.disputeDetails.questionanddisputeDetails.descriptionare trimmed before rendering.ReactMarkdownwhen content is not present.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
disputeDetails, ensuring that question and description are only displayed when they contain non-empty content.Bug Fixes
disputeDetailsis undefined or contains empty fields.