-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(l1): made the tx-spammer work with our node #1027
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d1e7187
Merge branch 'fix-bootstrap-node-in-localnet' into tx-spammer-and-kur…
rodrigo-o ee2458a
Solved the initial issue regarding blocks not found, popped a new one…
rodrigo-o 2818324
Resolving pending blocks default to latest if no pending and change a…
rodrigo-o 937ad3e
Merge branch 'main' into tx-spammer-and-kurtosis-initial-params
rodrigo-o 122a349
Merge branch 'main' into tx-spammer-and-kurtosis-initial-params
rodrigo-o 54a8a3f
Reactivate all additional services after the latest merges
rodrigo-o afb6c89
Removed unnecesary diffs
rodrigo-o 58639d5
Added a comment + format
rodrigo-o 90bbd32
Merge branch 'main' into tx-spammer-and-kurtosis-initial-params
rodrigo-o File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these parameters are based on our current capabilities?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really, this is mostly to be able to track the execution instead of having hundreds of transactions (Which by the way we still need to check why we just add one as shown in the image). Most of the initial issues regarding the node being unable to propose weren't related to concurrency as I initially thought but to the errors mentioned in the PR description.