Solution #648
Solution #648
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this project! 😊 There are a couple of critical issues that need to be addressed to ensure the code functions correctly.
-
The
__get__method in theIntegerRangeclass should return the value of the attribute, but it currently returnsNone. This needs to be corrected to ensure that the attribute value is properly retrieved. -
The
Slideclass incorrectly usesClassfrompyclbrfor instantiation, which is not appropriate. You should usetypeor a specific class type that can be instantiated instead.
Once these issues are resolved, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the great work, and I'm looking forward to seeing the improvements. 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
| @@ -1,25 +1,68 @@ | |||
| from abc import ABC | |||
| from pyclbr import Class | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The import from pyclbr import Class is incorrect for the intended usage. Class from pyclbr is not meant to be used as a type for instantiation. Consider using type or a specific class type that can be instantiated.
app/main.py
Outdated
| def __set_name__(self, owner: Any, name: str) -> None: | ||
| self.protected_name = f"_{name}" | ||
|
|
||
| def __get__(self, instance: Any, owner: Any) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The __get__ method should return the value of the attribute, but it currently returns None. Change the return type to Any to reflect that it should return the attribute value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job on addressing the previous issues and improving the code! 🎉 The code now meets the task requirements and constraints, and all necessary classes and methods are implemented correctly. However, there are a couple of areas that could still use some attention:
-
__get__Method inIntegerRangeClass: The method should return the value as a string, as indicated by its return type annotation-> str. Consider converting the returned value to a string to align with the expected behavior. -
limitation_classCheck inSlideClass: It would be beneficial to add a check to ensure thatlimitation_classis a subclass ofSlideLimitationValidator. This will prevent incorrect usage and ensure that only valid limitation classes are used with theSlideclass.
Despite these minor issues, the decision is to APPROVE the Pull Request to help you move forward with your learning. Please review the comments and consider making these improvements in future iterations. Keep up the good work and continue to learn from your experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| def __get__(self, instance: Any, owner: Any) -> str: | ||
| return getattr(instance, self.protected_name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The __get__ method in the IntegerRange class should return the value as a string, as indicated by its return type annotation -> str. Consider converting the returned value to a string.
| def __init__(self, name: str, limitation_class: type) -> None: | ||
| self.name = name | ||
| self.limitation_class = limitation_class |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a check to ensure that limitation_class is a subclass of SlideLimitationValidator to prevent incorrect usage. This will ensure that only valid limitation classes are used with the Slide class.
No description provided.