Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

done #1660

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

done #1660

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Leo9siy
Copy link

@Leo9siy Leo9siy commented Dec 28, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on implementing the Person class and the create_person_list function! 🎉 Your code meets the task requirements and constraints effectively. While there are some suggestions for improvement, such as using dict.get() for cleaner key checks and considering list comprehension for creating lists, these are minor enhancements. Keep up the good work, and consider these tips for even more readable and efficient code in the future! 😊

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Comment on lines +15 to +16
for human in people:
new_people_list.append(Person(human["name"], human["age"]))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using list comprehension to create the new_people_list. This will make the code more concise and is recommended by the checklist: 'When creating a list of instances from a collection (such as a list of dictionaries), it is recommended to use list comprehension rather than traditional for loops.'

new_people_list.append(Person(human["name"], human["age"]))

for human in people:
if "wife" in human and human["wife"]:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use the dict.get() method instead of explicitly checking for the presence of a key. This approach simplifies the code and avoids potential KeyError exceptions, making it cleaner and more concise. For example: if human.get('wife'):

for human in people:
if "wife" in human and human["wife"]:
Person.people[human["name"]].wife = Person.people[human["wife"]]
elif "husband" in human and human["husband"]:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly, use the dict.get() method here instead of explicitly checking for the presence of a key. For example: elif human.get('husband'):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants