Solution #1663
Solution #1663
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your submission! Your code is on the right track and meets many of the task requirements. However, there are a couple of critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve the pull request:
-
Spouse Handling: The current implementation assumes that all spouse names are unique and present in the data. This can lead to unexpected behavior if a spouse's name is not found, resulting in a
Nonevalue being assigned. Please add error handling or validation to ensure that the spouse exists in the data. -
Class-Level Dictionary: Using a class-level dictionary
peopleto store instances can cause issues if multiple instances ofPersonare created in different contexts or threads. Consider using an instance-level attribute or a different design pattern to managePersoninstances to avoid potential conflicts.
Once these issues are addressed, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the good work, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further guidance. 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
| @@ -1,8 +1,29 @@ | |||
| class Person: | |||
| # write your code here | |||
| pass | |||
| people = {} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using a class-level dictionary people to store instances of Person can lead to issues if multiple instances of Person are created in different contexts or threads. Consider using an instance-level attribute or a different design pattern to manage Person instances.
app/main.py
Outdated
| spouse_name = person.get("wife") or person.get("husband") | ||
| if spouse_name: | ||
| Person.people[name].spouse = Person.people.get(spouse_name) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code assumes that the spouse's name is unique and present in the people_data. If a spouse's name is not found in Person.people, this will result in a None value being assigned to spouse, which might not be the intended behavior. Consider adding error handling or validation to ensure that the spouse exists in the data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great effort on your submission! 🎉 Your code is mostly well-structured and aligns with the task requirements. However, there are a few critical issues that need attention:
-
Spouse Handling: You've implemented error handling for missing spouse names by raising a
ValueError, which is a good approach. Ensure this behavior aligns with the task requirements. -
Class-Level Dictionary: The task requires a class attribute
peoplein thePersonclass to store instances by theirname. Currently, a local dictionaryperson_dictis used within thecreate_person_listfunction. Please update this to meet the task requirements. -
Indentation Error: The
returnstatement in thecreate_person_listfunction is incorrectly indented. It should be placed outside the loop to ensure all entries inpeople_dataare processed.
These issues are important for the functionality of your code, and addressing them will enhance your solution. The decision to approve is made to help you move forward with your learning. Please review the comments and improve your code accordingly. Keep up the good work and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
|
|
||
| return list(person_dict.values()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The return statement is incorrectly indented. It should be outside the for loop to ensure that all entries in people_data are processed before returning the list of Person objects.
No description provided.