fix: improve JSON parsing in pr-check script

src/scripts/pr-check.js

@@ -65,23 +65,22 @@ function getNewPackages(packageList) {
   const diffOutput = execSync(`git diff origin/${baseBranch} -- packages/package-list.json`).toString();
   const newPackages = [];
 
-  const diffLines = diffOutput.split('\n');
-  let currentPackage = null;
-
-  for (const line of diffLines) {
-    if (line.startsWith('+') && !line.startsWith('+++')) {
-      const trimmedLine = line.substring(1).trim();
-      if (trimmedLine.startsWith('{')) {
-        currentPackage = {};
-      } else if (trimmedLine.startsWith('}')) {
-        if (currentPackage) {
-          newPackages.push(currentPackage);
-          currentPackage = null;
-        }
-      } else if (currentPackage) {
-        const [key, value] = trimmedLine.split(':').map(s => s.trim().replace(/,$/, '').replace(/"/g, ''));
-        currentPackage[key] = value;
-      }
+  // Extract complete JSON objects from diff
+  const addedBlocks = diffOutput.match(/^\+\s*{[\s\S]*?^\+\s*}/gm) || [];
+
+  for (const block of addedBlocks) {
+    try {
+      // Remove diff markers and normalize whitespace
+      const cleanJson = block
+        .split('\n')
+        .map(line => line.replace(/^\+\s*/, ''))
+        .join('\n');
+
+      // Parse complete JSON object
+      const pkg = JSON.parse(cleanJson);
+      newPackages.push(pkg);
+    } catch (error) {
+      console.warn(`Warning: Failed to parse package block: ${error.message}`);
     }
   }
 

src/scripts/pr-check.test.js

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-import { validateRequiredFields } from './pr-check.js';
+import { execSync } from 'child_process';
+import { validateRequiredFields, getNewPackages } from './pr-check.js';
 
 describe('validateRequiredFields', () => {
   test('accepts valid GitHub URLs', () => {
@@ -40,3 +41,61 @@ describe('validateRequiredFields', () => {
     expect(() => validateRequiredFields(pkg)).not.toThrow();
   });
 });
+
+describe('getNewPackages', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    jest.clearAllMocks();
+  });
+
+  it('should correctly parse package with URL from git diff', () => {
+    const mockDiff = `
++  {
++    "name": "test-package",
++    "description": "Test Package",
++    "vendor": "test",
++    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/test/repo",
++    "homepage": "https://github.com/test/repo",
++    "license": "MIT",
++    "runtime": "python"
++  }`;
+
+    execSync.mockReturnValue(Buffer.from(mockDiff));
+
+    const packages = getNewPackages({});
+    expect(packages).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(packages[0].sourceUrl).toBe('https://github.com/test/repo');
+  });
+
+  it('should handle multiple packages in diff', () => {
+    const mockDiff = `
++  {
++    "name": "package1",
++    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/test/repo1"
++  },
++  {
++    "name": "package2",
++    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/test/repo2"
++  }`;
+
+    execSync.mockReturnValue(Buffer.from(mockDiff));
+
+    const packages = getNewPackages({});
+    expect(packages).toHaveLength(2);
+    expect(packages[0].sourceUrl).toBe('https://github.com/test/repo1');
+    expect(packages[1].sourceUrl).toBe('https://github.com/test/repo2');
+  });
+
+  it('should handle invalid JSON gracefully', () => {
+    const mockDiff = `
++  {
++    "name": "broken-package",
++    "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/test/repo"
++    invalid-json-here
++  }`;
+
+    execSync.mockReturnValue(Buffer.from(mockDiff));
+
+    const packages = getNewPackages({});
+    expect(packages).toHaveLength(0);
+  });
+});