-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bugfix/noid/fix websocket connection for chat #4448
Conversation
As remote server is empty instead null when not available, the check was also true when no remote server was in use. Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <[email protected]>
The request seems to cause problems so blockingSubscribe doesn't seem to be a good choice here. This commit will replace blockingSubscribe by subscribe and modify the related code in order to be executed when the request succeeds. The root cause why the request seems to cause problems may have to be analyzed further. I was not able to reproduce the ANR without this PR, however the following error was reported on gplay console very often!: at jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park (Native method) at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park (LockSupport.java:341) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNode.block (AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:506) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.unmanagedBlock (ForkJoinPool.java:3466) at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock (ForkJoinPool.java:3437) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await (AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1623) at java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take (LinkedBlockingQueue.java:435) at io.reactivex.internal.operators.observable.ObservableBlockingSubscribe.subscribe (ObservableBlockingSubscribe.java:56) at io.reactivex.Observable.blockingSubscribe (Observable.java:5552) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.setupWebsocket (ChatActivity.kt:2445) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.joinRoomWithPassword (ChatActivity.kt:2402) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.initObservers$lambda$13 (ChatActivity.kt:594) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity.$r8$lambda$QKH5JCFLmCzRMlSJ-EV-m4IW5ig (unavailable) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$$ExternalSyntheticLambda38.invoke (D8$$SyntheticClass) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$sam$androidx_lifecycle_Observer$0.onChanged (unavailable:2) at androidx.lifecycle.LiveData.considerNotify (LiveData.java:133) at androidx.lifecycle.LiveData.dispatchingValue (LiveData.java:151) at androidx.lifecycle.LiveData.setValue (LiveData.java:309) at androidx.lifecycle.MutableLiveData.setValue (MutableLiveData.java:50) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.viewmodels.ChatViewModel.getCapabilities (ChatViewModel.kt:240) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$1$1.invokeSuspend (ChatActivity.kt:553) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$1$1.invoke (unavailable:8) at com.nextcloud.talk.chat.ChatActivity$initObservers$1$1.invoke (unavailable:4) at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:219) at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__ErrorsKt$catchImpl$2.emit (Errors.kt:154) at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__TransformKt$onEach$$inlined$unsafeTransform$1$2.emit (Emitters.kt:220) at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl.collect$suspendImpl (SharedFlow.kt:392) at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SharedFlowImpl$collect$1.invokeSuspend (unavailable:15) at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith (ContinuationImpl.kt:33) at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run (DispatchedTask.kt:104) at android.os.Handler.handleCallback (Handler.java:938) at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage (Handler.java:99) at android.os.Looper.loopOnce (Looper.java:210) at android.os.Looper.loop (Looper.java:299) at android.app.ActivityThread.main (ActivityThread.java:8168) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Native method) at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run (RuntimeInit.java:556) at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main (ZygoteInit.java:1037) Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <[email protected]>
however i was not able to see onDestroy being executed. anyway, disposables won't be necessary when coroutine is used. also: remove a useless outdated log line Signed-off-by: Marcel Hibbe <[email protected]>
dc54718
to
acd9648
Compare
APK file: https://www.kaminsky.me/nc-dev/android-artifacts/4448-talk.apk |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have not tested, but the changes make sense and look good 👍
Approved, as I guess that the disposable does what I expected it to do, but please check the comment before merging :-)
🏁 Checklist
/backport to stable-xx.x