Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

Prepare for 3.6.1 release #90

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Prepare for 3.6.1 release #90

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ChrisMaddock
Copy link
Member

Had a spare half hour, so thought I'd get ahead of the game with this.

I think we should still get #75 and #85 into this release - can merge those in and update the release notes once they're done.

Have I missed anything? 😄

@rprouse
Copy link
Member

rprouse commented Jan 27, 2017

Looks good so far. I don't see anything you've missed, but I haven't released this since 3.0 😄

@ChrisMaddock ChrisMaddock changed the title Prepare for 3.6 release Prepare for 3.6.1 release Mar 13, 2017
Copy link
Member

@rprouse rprouse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The nuspec file also needs to be updated with the dependency on NUnit 3.6.1

CHANGES.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
### NUnit Xamarin Runner 3.6.0 - January 26, 2017
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3.6.0 was never released, so this should be changed to the current release 3.6.1 and recently fixed issues added.

build.cake Outdated
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ var configuration = Argument("configuration", "Release");
var isLocal = BuildSystem.IsLocalBuild;
var isRunningOnAppVeyor = AppVeyor.IsRunningOnAppVeyor;

var version = "3.0.1";
var version = "3.6.0";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess you are going to pull in recent changes which will update this to 3.6.1?

[assembly: AssemblyTrademark("NUnit is a trademark of NUnit Software")]
[assembly: AssemblyCulture("")]

[assembly: AssemblyVersion("3.0.*")]
[assembly: AssemblyFileVersion("3.0.0.0")]
[assembly: AssemblyVersion("3.6.*")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we change this to an explicit version rather than the *?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems sensible to me. I wasn't sure why they were *'s - so I just left them as they were!

@ChrisMaddock
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for these Rob - I was planning to come back to this PR and update tonight. 🙂

The things I'm currently aware of are:

  • Update version numbers
  • Update Changelog with version/released date/new issues
  • Update year on licence.txt
  • Make draft release

The nuspec file was done in #85, this branch just needs rebasing. Anything else you can think of?

@CharliePoole
Copy link
Member

If, as @rprouse says, we never released 3.6.0, why is this 3.6.1? That seems potentially confusing.

@rprouse
Copy link
Member

rprouse commented Mar 14, 2017

@ChrisMaddock that looks like a good list.

@CharliePoole it is going to be 3.6.1 because it is like NUnitLite and references the 3.6.1 framework so we thought they should match to prevent confusion.

@CharliePoole
Copy link
Member

I don't think we should use *s in any of our versions.

@ChrisMaddock ChrisMaddock deleted the release/3.6 branch March 14, 2017 21:23
@ChrisMaddock ChrisMaddock mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2017
5 tasks
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants