-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Conversation
e6986a7
to
d6ae087
Compare
Looks good so far. I don't see anything you've missed, but I haven't released this since 3.0 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The nuspec file also needs to be updated with the dependency on NUnit 3.6.1
CHANGES.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
### NUnit Xamarin Runner 3.6.0 - January 26, 2017 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
3.6.0 was never released, so this should be changed to the current release 3.6.1 and recently fixed issues added.
build.cake
Outdated
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ var configuration = Argument("configuration", "Release"); | |||
var isLocal = BuildSystem.IsLocalBuild; | |||
var isRunningOnAppVeyor = AppVeyor.IsRunningOnAppVeyor; | |||
|
|||
var version = "3.0.1"; | |||
var version = "3.6.0"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess you are going to pull in recent changes which will update this to 3.6.1?
[assembly: AssemblyTrademark("NUnit is a trademark of NUnit Software")] | ||
[assembly: AssemblyCulture("")] | ||
|
||
[assembly: AssemblyVersion("3.0.*")] | ||
[assembly: AssemblyFileVersion("3.0.0.0")] | ||
[assembly: AssemblyVersion("3.6.*")] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we change this to an explicit version rather than the *?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems sensible to me. I wasn't sure why they were *'s - so I just left them as they were!
Thanks for these Rob - I was planning to come back to this PR and update tonight. 🙂 The things I'm currently aware of are:
The nuspec file was done in #85, this branch just needs rebasing. Anything else you can think of? |
If, as @rprouse says, we never released 3.6.0, why is this 3.6.1? That seems potentially confusing. |
@ChrisMaddock that looks like a good list. @CharliePoole it is going to be 3.6.1 because it is like NUnitLite and references the 3.6.1 framework so we thought they should match to prevent confusion. |
I don't think we should use *s in any of our versions. |
d6ae087
to
53771eb
Compare
Had a spare half hour, so thought I'd get ahead of the game with this.
I think we should still get #75 and #85 into this release - can merge those in and update the release notes once they're done.
Have I missed anything? 😄