Experimenting with Microfrontends #9194
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant structural changes to the Care React Typescript Project documentation and codebase. It reorganizes the project by defining pages in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
79e2910
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://82c312e6.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://microfrontend.care-fe.pages.dev |
❌ Deploy Preview for care-ohc failed.
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (49)
src/types/plugConfig.ts (1)
2-2: Consider adding validation for the slug formatThe
slugproperty might benefit from a more specific type to ensure consistent formatting.Consider using a branded type or regex validation:
type Slug = string & { readonly _brand: unique symbol }; function createSlug(value: string): Slug { if (!/^[a-z0-9]+(?:-[a-z0-9]+)*$/.test(value)) { throw new Error('Invalid slug format'); } return value as Slug; }src/components/ui/label.tsx (3)
1-5: Optimize imports for better maintainability and bundle sizeConsider the following improvements:
- Remove the React import as it's not needed in modern React (17+)
- Use named imports instead of wildcards to potentially reduce bundle size
-import * as React from "react"; -import * as LabelPrimitive from "@radix-ui/react-label"; +import { Root as LabelRoot } from "@radix-ui/react-label"; import { cva, type VariantProps } from "class-variance-authority"; import { cn } from "@/lib/utils";🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 1-1:
Deleteimport·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Replace·cva,·type·VariantProps·}·from·"class-variance-authoritywith·type·VariantProps,·cva·}·from·"class-variance-authority";⏎import·*·as·React·from·"react
7-9: Consider adding variants for different label stylesThe current implementation only includes base styles. Consider adding variants for different sizes, colors, or states to make the component more versatile.
const labelVariants = cva( "text-sm font-medium leading-none peer-disabled:cursor-not-allowed peer-disabled:opacity-70", + { + variants: { + size: { + default: "text-sm", + large: "text-base", + small: "text-xs" + }, + required: { + true: "after:content-['*'] after:text-red-500 after:ml-0.5" + } + }, + defaultVariants: { + size: "default" + } + } );
11-22: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentationThe implementation is well-structured with proper type safety and ref forwarding. To improve maintainability, consider adding JSDoc documentation for the component and its props.
+/** + * A form label component built on top of Radix UI Label primitive. + * Supports all HTML label attributes and custom styling variants. + * + * @example + * ```tsx + * <Label htmlFor="email">Email address</Label> + * ``` + */ const Label = React.forwardRef< React.ElementRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root>, React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof LabelPrimitive.Root> & VariantProps<typeof labelVariants> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => (tsconfig.json (1)
25-26: Consider co-locating LiveKit types with the featureIn a microfrontend architecture, consider co-locating the LiveKit types with the feature implementation rather than in a central types directory. This helps maintain better isolation between microfrontends and makes the codebase more maintainable.
Suggested approaches:
- Move types to the LiveKit feature directory if it's part of a specific microfrontend
- If these types are shared between multiple microfrontends, consider creating a shared types package
"paths": { "@careConfig": ["./care.config.ts"], - "care_livekit/*": ["src/types/*"] + "care_livekit/*": ["src/features/livekit/types/*"] }src/components/ui/textarea.tsx (3)
5-6: Consider adding aria-related props for better accessibility.While extending HTMLTextAreaElement attributes provides good coverage, consider explicitly documenting commonly used aria props in the interface for better developer experience.
export interface TextareaProps - extends React.TextareaHTMLAttributes<HTMLTextAreaElement> {} + extends React.TextareaHTMLAttributes<HTMLTextAreaElement> { + // Explicitly document commonly used aria props + 'aria-label'?: string; + 'aria-describedby'?: string; + 'aria-invalid'?: boolean; + }
8-21: Add error state styling and consider resize control.The component handles focus and disabled states well, but could benefit from:
- Visual feedback for error states (e.g., when aria-invalid is true)
- Control over resize behavior
"flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-gray-200 bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-sm shadow-sm placeholder:text-gray-500 focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-gray-950 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 dark:border-gray-800 dark:placeholder:text-gray-400 dark:focus-visible:ring-gray-300", + "resize-y", // Allow vertical resizing by default + "aria-[invalid=true]:border-red-500 aria-[invalid=true]:ring-red-500", // Error state styling className,
1-24: Consider adding unit tests for the component.The component looks well-implemented, but it's important to ensure its behavior is tested, especially:
- Ref forwarding
- Class name merging
- Prop spreading
- Accessibility features
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for this component?
src/components/ui/input.tsx (3)
5-6: Add JSDoc documentation for the InputProps interfaceConsider adding documentation to improve developer experience and code maintainability.
+/** + * Props for the Input component. + * Extends all standard HTML input attributes. + */ export interface InputProps extends React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement> {}
8-22: Add JSDoc documentation and improve accessibilityThe component implementation is solid, but could benefit from documentation and accessibility improvements.
+/** + * A reusable input component that supports forwarded refs and custom styling. + * Includes support for dark mode and focus states. + * + * @example + * ```tsx + * <Input + * type="text" + * placeholder="Enter your name" + * aria-label="Name input" + * /> + * ``` + */ const Input = React.forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, InputProps>( ({ className, type, ...props }, ref) => { return ( <input type={type} + aria-label={props.placeholder} className={cn(
1-25: Consider microfrontends architecture implicationsSince this component is part of a shared UI library in a microfrontends architecture:
- Consider publishing this component to a shared component library that can be versioned and consumed by different microfrontends
- Ensure consistent styling across microfrontends by sharing the Tailwind configuration
- Document the component's usage patterns in the shared component library documentation
Would you like assistance in setting up the component library documentation or configuration?
src/App.tsx (1)
24-25: Consider microfrontend architecture patternsFor microfrontend implementation, instead of removing the router, consider:
- Implementing a composite router that can:
- Handle both main app and microfrontend routes
- Manage route-based micro-frontend loading
- Using module federation for dynamic imports
- Setting up shared dependencies and runtime
This maintains core functionality while enabling microfrontend integration.
Would you like me to provide a detailed architectural proposal for implementing microfrontends while preserving the routing infrastructure?
src/Utils/AuthorizeFor.tsx (1)
50-50: Consider adding an error type for better error contextThe new ErrorPage component supports different error types, but we're not specifying one. Consider passing an appropriate error type to provide better context to users when they encounter authorization errors.
- return <ErrorPage />; + return <ErrorPage forError="UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS" />;src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx (3)
7-11: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The type definitions are well-structured and type-safe. The union type approach for
ErrorTypemakes it easy to extend with additional error states in the future.Consider adding JSDoc comments to improve documentation:
+/** Defines the possible error states that can be displayed */ type ErrorType = "PAGE_NOT_FOUND" | "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR"; +/** Props for the ErrorPage component */ interface ErrorPageProps { + /** The type of error to display. Defaults to "PAGE_NOT_FOUND" if not provided */ forError?: ErrorType; }
22-33: Consider using distinct images for different error types.The error content mapping is well-structured, but both error types currently use the same image (
404.svg). Consider creating and using a distinct image forPAGE_LOAD_ERRORto help users better distinguish between different error states.PAGE_LOAD_ERROR: { - image: "/images/404.svg", + image: "/images/error.svg", title: t("page_load_error"), message: t("could_not_load_page"), },
35-41: Consider integrating with React Error Boundary.While the error page implementation is solid, consider integrating it with React Error Boundary to handle runtime errors gracefully.
Here's a suggestion for implementing an error boundary:
// ErrorBoundary.tsx import React from 'react'; import ErrorPage from './ErrorPage'; class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component< { children: React.ReactNode }, { hasError: boolean } > { constructor(props: { children: React.ReactNode }) { super(props); this.state = { hasError: false }; } static getDerivedStateFromError(_: Error) { return { hasError: true }; } render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return <ErrorPage forError="PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" />; } return this.props.children; } } export default ErrorBoundary;.cursorrules (5)
3-5: Project structure documentation needs more detailWhile the basic structure is outlined, the documentation would benefit from additional details:
- Explain the difference between pages and components
- Provide guidelines for when to create a page vs. a component
- Include information about the shadcn/ui component customization
7-8: Enhance routing documentation with examplesThe routing explanation could be more helpful with:
- A concrete example of the Routes object structure
- Guidelines for route naming conventions
- Explanation of route parameters
Consider adding this example:
const routes = { home: "/", apps: "/apps", appConfig: "/apps/plug-configs/:slug", };
9-15: Icon usage example needs improvementWhile the example shows basic usage, it would be more helpful to:
- Document available icon variants (filled, outlined, etc.)
- List commonly used icons
- Explain icon sizing and color customization
Line range hint
42-49: API request example needs error handlingThe request example should demonstrate proper error handling:
Consider updating to:
try { const { res } = await request(routes.partialUpdateAsset, { pathParams: { external_id: assetId }, body: data, }); // Handle success } catch (error) { // Handle error appropriately console.error('Failed to update asset:', error); }
Line range hint
1-49: Documentation needs structural organizationThe documentation would benefit from clear section headers and a table of contents. Consider organizing it into these sections:
- Project Overview
- Project Structure
- Routing
- UI Components
- Data Fetching
- API Integration
src/PluginEngine.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-31: Review architectural approach to microfrontends integrationThe current implementation mixes two different patterns:
- A plugin system (using
pluginMapandPLUGIN_Component)- Direct component integration (CareLivekit)
This could lead to:
- Inconsistent integration patterns
- Reduced maintainability
- Confusion about when to use plugins vs. direct integration
Consider these architectural alternatives:
- Integrate CareLivekit through the existing plugin system:
// Add to pluginMap const careLivekitPlugin = { plugin: 'care_livekit', components: { main: React.lazy(() => import("care_livekit/CareLivekit")) } }; // Use PLUGIN_Component instead of direct rendering <PLUGIN_Component __name="main" />
- Create a dedicated microfrontends integration layer:
// src/microfrontends/MicrofrontendLoader.tsx interface MicrofrontendConfig { name: string; component: React.LazyExoticComponent<React.ComponentType>; enabled: boolean; } const microfrontends: MicrofrontendConfig[] = [ { name: 'CareLivekit', component: React.lazy(() => import("care_livekit/CareLivekit")), enabled: true } ];This would provide a more consistent and maintainable approach to managing microfrontends.
src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigList.tsx (2)
1-19: Consider organizing imports more efficientlyThe imports could be better organized by grouping them more tightly:
- import { navigate } from "raviger"; - - import CareIcon from "@/CAREUI/icons/CareIcon"; - - import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button"; - import { - Table, - TableBody, - TableCell, - TableHead, - TableHeader, - TableRow, - } from "@/components/ui/table"; - - import Loading from "@/components/Common/Loading"; - - import routes from "@/Utils/request/api"; - import useQuery from "@/Utils/request/useQuery"; - import { PlugConfig } from "@/types/plugConfig"; + // External dependencies + import { navigate } from "raviger"; + + // UI Components + import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button"; + import { Table, TableBody, TableCell, TableHead, TableHeader, TableRow } from "@/components/ui/table"; + import Loading from "@/components/Common/Loading"; + import CareIcon from "@/CAREUI/icons/CareIcon"; + + // Utils & Types + import routes from "@/Utils/request/api"; + import useQuery from "@/Utils/request/useQuery"; + import { PlugConfig } from "@/types/plugConfig";
21-22: Improve type safety for API responseThe component should explicitly type the API response data to ensure type safety.
+ interface PlugConfigResponse { + configs: PlugConfig[]; + } + export function PlugConfigList() { - const { data, loading } = useQuery(routes.plugConfig.listPlugConfigs); + const { data, loading } = useQuery<PlugConfigResponse>(routes.plugConfig.listPlugConfigs);src/components/ui/card.tsx (5)
5-19: Consider enhancing accessibility attributes.The Card component looks good, but could benefit from some accessibility improvements.
Consider adding these accessibility enhancements:
<div ref={ref} className={cn( "rounded-xl border border-gray-200 bg-white text-gray-950 shadow dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 dark:text-gray-50", className, )} + role="article" + tabIndex={0} {...props} />
20-31: Consider restricting allowed HTML attributes.The component looks good, but using the full HTMLAttributes might be too permissive.
Consider creating a more specific type interface:
interface CardHeaderProps extends Pick<React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>, 'className' | 'children' | 'style' | 'id'> { // Add any specific props here }Then use it in the component:
-React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> +CardHeaderProps
56-62: Consider documenting the padding choice.The component looks good, but would benefit from a comment explaining why top padding is removed.
Add a comment explaining the padding structure:
const CardContent = React.forwardRef< HTMLDivElement, React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( + // Remove top padding as CardHeader already provides spacing <div ref={ref} className={cn("p-6 pt-0", className)} {...props} /> ));
64-74: Consider adding alignment flexibility.The footer's flex alignment could be more configurable for different use cases.
Consider adding alignment options:
+interface CardFooterProps extends React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> { + align?: 'start' | 'center' | 'end' | 'between' | 'around'; +} const CardFooter = React.forwardRef< HTMLDivElement, - React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> + CardFooterProps ->(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( +>(({ className, align = 'center', ...props }, ref) => ( <div ref={ref} - className={cn("flex items-center p-6 pt-0", className)} + className={cn( + "flex p-6 pt-0", + { + 'items-center justify-center': align === 'center', + 'items-start justify-start': align === 'start', + 'items-center justify-end': align === 'end', + 'items-center justify-between': align === 'between', + 'items-center justify-around': align === 'around', + }, + className + )} {...props} /> ));
1-83: Consider adding component documentation and examples.The card system is well-implemented, but would benefit from documentation about common usage patterns and composition examples.
Consider adding:
- JSDoc comments for each component describing their purpose and props
- A usage example showing how to compose the components together
- A README.md file in the UI components directory with detailed documentation
Example JSDoc:
/** * Card component that serves as a container for content with a consistent style. * * @example * ```tsx * <Card> * <CardHeader> * <CardTitle>Title</CardTitle> * <CardDescription>Description</CardDescription> * </CardHeader> * <CardContent>Content</CardContent> * <CardFooter>Footer</CardFooter> * </Card> * ``` */src/components/ui/table.tsx (4)
5-18: Add accessibility attributes to the table componentWhile the implementation is solid, consider enhancing accessibility by adding ARIA attributes.
const Table = React.forwardRef< HTMLTableElement, React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLTableElement> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( - <div className="relative w-full overflow-auto"> + <div className="relative w-full overflow-auto" role="region" aria-label="Scrollable table"> <table ref={ref} className={cn("w-full caption-bottom text-sm", className)} + role="table" {...props} /> </div> ));
19-53: Enhance type safety for table structure componentsConsider adding runtime validation for props and stricter TypeScript types to prevent potential misuse.
// Add these types at the top of the file type TableHeaderProps = React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLTableSectionElement> & { // Add any specific props here sticky?: boolean; }; // Then update the component const TableHeader = React.forwardRef<HTMLTableSectionElement, TableHeaderProps>( ({ className, sticky, ...props }, ref) => ( <thead ref={ref} className={cn( "[&_tr]:border-b", sticky && "sticky top-0 bg-white z-10", className )} {...props} /> ) );
54-109: Consider adding built-in sort functionality to TableHeadThe table components could benefit from built-in sorting capabilities, especially for the TableHead component.
// Add these types at the top of the file type SortDirection = 'asc' | 'desc' | undefined; interface TableHeadProps extends React.ThHTMLAttributes<HTMLTableCellElement> { sortable?: boolean; sortDirection?: SortDirection; onSort?: (direction: SortDirection) => void; } // Updated TableHead implementation const TableHead = React.forwardRef<HTMLTableCellElement, TableHeadProps>( ({ className, sortable, sortDirection, onSort, ...props }, ref) => ( <th ref={ref} className={cn( "h-10 px-2 text-left align-middle font-medium text-gray-500", sortable && "cursor-pointer select-none", className )} onClick={sortable ? () => onSort?.( sortDirection === 'asc' ? 'desc' : sortDirection === 'desc' ? undefined : 'asc' ) : undefined} {...props} > <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> {props.children} {sortable && sortDirection && ( <span>{sortDirection === 'asc' ? '↑' : '↓'}</span> )} </div> </th> ) );
1-120: Add documentation and tests for the table componentsWhile the implementation is solid, consider the following improvements:
- Add JSDoc comments for each component describing props and usage
- Create a test suite covering various use cases
- Add example usage in Storybook or similar documentation
Would you like me to help generate:
- Component documentation with JSDoc comments?
- A test suite using React Testing Library?
- Storybook stories for these components?
src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx (2)
1-11: Consider reordering imports per static analysis suggestion.The component structure and imports look good, following React best practices and the compound component pattern.
Consider reordering imports to match the project's style guide:
-import * as React from "react"; import * as AlertDialogPrimitive from "@radix-ui/react-alert-dialog"; +import * as React from "react"; import { cn } from "@/lib/utils"; import { buttonVariants } from "@/components/ui/button";🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 1-1:
Deleteimport·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Insertimport·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 4-4:
Insert⏎
28-44: Consider extracting the className configuration for better maintainability.The implementation is solid, but the className string on line 37 is quite long. Consider extracting it to a constant or utility function.
+const contentStyles = { + base: "fixed left-[50%] top-[50%] z-50 grid w-full max-w-lg translate-x-[-50%] translate-y-[-50%] gap-4 border border-gray-200 bg-white p-6 shadow-lg duration-200", + animations: "data-[state=open]:animate-in data-[state=closed]:animate-out data-[state=closed]:fade-out-0 data-[state=open]:fade-in-0 data-[state=closed]:zoom-out-95 data-[state=open]:zoom-in-95 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-left-1/2 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-top-[48%] data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-left-1/2 data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-top-[48%]", + theme: "dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 sm:rounded-lg" +}; const AlertDialogContent = React.forwardRef< React.ElementRef<typeof AlertDialogPrimitive.Content>, React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof AlertDialogPrimitive.Content> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( <AlertDialogPortal> <AlertDialogOverlay /> <AlertDialogPrimitive.Content ref={ref} - className={cn( - "fixed left-[50%] top-[50%] z-50 grid w-full max-w-lg translate-x-[-50%] translate-y-[-50%] gap-4 border border-gray-200 bg-white p-6 shadow-lg duration-200 data-[state=open]:animate-in data-[state=closed]:animate-out data-[state=closed]:fade-out-0 data-[state=open]:fade-in-0 data-[state=closed]:zoom-out-95 data-[state=open]:zoom-in-95 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-left-1/2 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-top-[48%] data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-left-1/2 data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-top-[48%] dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 sm:rounded-lg", - className - )} + className={cn([contentStyles.base, contentStyles.animations, contentStyles.theme, className])} {...props} /> </AlertDialogPortal> ));package.json (1)
Documentation needed for module federation architecture
The codebase has module federation implemented with
@originjs/vite-plugin-federationand includes a remote modulecare_livekit, but lacks dedicated architecture documentation. This confirms the need for architectural documentation to help developers understand:
- The host-remote relationship with
care_livekit_fe- Module federation configuration in
vite.config.mts- Integration patterns and shared dependencies
Recommended additions:
- Create an
ARCHITECTURE.mdfile documenting the microfrontend strategy- Include module federation setup details in the existing
README.md- Document the integration with
care_livekit_feremote module🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-191: Consider documenting microfrontend architecture decisionsSince this is a significant architectural shift to microfrontends, consider:
- Documenting the module federation setup
- Establishing guidelines for:
- Shared dependencies management
- Build and deployment strategies
- Runtime integration patterns
Recommended additions to the project:
- Add a
ARCHITECTURE.mdfile describing the microfrontend strategy- Document the relationship between host and remote modules
- Define guidelines for sharing state and services
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for existing architecture documentation fd -t f -e md -x grep -l -i "architecture\|microfrontend" {}Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the module federation setup first rg -l "@originjs/vite-plugin-federation" # Check for any existing documentation about architecture fd -t f -e md # Look for module federation configuration rg -l "ModuleFederationPlugin|vite-plugin-federation" -g "*.{js,ts,json}" # Check for remote entry configurations rg "remotes:|exposes:" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 778
src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (1)
67-67: Consider architectural improvements for microfrontend integrationSince this PR is experimenting with microfrontends, consider these architectural improvements:
- The app settings navigation item could be dynamically loaded based on available microfrontends
- The route could be registered through a microfrontend registry rather than being hardcoded
Consider refactoring the navigation items to support dynamic registration from microfrontends:
// Example approach for dynamic navigation registration interface MicrofrontendNavItem extends INavItem { appId: string; priority?: number; } const getMicrofrontendNavItems = (): MicrofrontendNavItem[] => { // Fetch from microfrontend registry return []; }; const BaseNavItems: INavItem[] = [ // ... existing items ... ...(careConfig.features.microfrontends ? getMicrofrontendNavItems() : []), ];src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
71-71: Consider replacing 'any' with a proper type definitionThe component props are currently typed as
any, which bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits.Consider defining a proper interface for the props:
-export const ConsultationDetails = (props: any) => { +interface ConsultationDetailsProps { + facilityId: string; + patientId: string; + consultationId: string; + tab: string; +} + +export const ConsultationDetails = (props: ConsultationDetailsProps) => {
Line range hint
71-391: Consider breaking down the component for better maintainabilityThe component is quite large and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused components.
Suggested breakdown:
- Extract the header section (navigation, buttons) into a separate component
- Extract the patient info section into a separate component
- Extract the tab navigation into a separate component
- Create a custom hook for data fetching logic
This would improve:
- Code organization
- Reusability
- Testing
- Maintenance
src/PluginRegistry.ts (5)
13-13: Avoid usinganyas a type for component propertiesUsing
anyreduces type safety and can lead to runtime errors. Consider specifying a more precise type for the component, such asReact.ComponentType<unknown>or defining a specific props interface to enhance type safety.
34-35: Improve type safety by extending theWindowinterfaceInstead of casting
windowtoany, you can extend theWindowinterface to includeReactandReactDOM. This approach maintains type safety and avoids usingany.Apply this diff to extend the
Windowinterface:+declare global { + interface Window { + React: typeof React; + ReactDOM: typeof ReactDOM; + } +} + (window as any).React = React; (window as any).ReactDOM = ReactDOM;Then update the assignments without the
as anycasts:-(window as any).React = React; -(window as any).ReactDOM = ReactDOM; +window.React = React; +window.ReactDOM = ReactDOM;
60-62: Enhance error handling for failed plugin loadsCurrently, if a plugin fails to load, the error is logged to the console, but there may not be user-facing feedback. Consider implementing additional error handling mechanisms to inform the user and ensure the application remains stable if a plugin fails to load.
76-78: Handle duplicate plugin registrations to prevent unintended overwritesIf a plugin with the same name is registered more than once, it overwrites the existing entry without warning. Consider adding a check to prevent duplicate registrations or to log a warning when a duplicate plugin is registered.
30-64: Load plugins in parallel to improve performanceCurrently, plugins are loaded sequentially due to the
awaitinside thefor...ofloop, which can increase load times when multiple plugins are being loaded. To enhance performance, consider loading plugins in parallel usingPromise.all.Apply this diff to load plugins concurrently:
async loadPlugins(configs: PluginConfig[]) { - for (const config of configs) { + await Promise.all(configs.map(async (config) => { try { // Provide React and ReactDOM to the plugin - (window as any).React = React; - (window as any).ReactDOM = ReactDOM; + window.React = React; + window.ReactDOM = ReactDOM; await this.loadScript(config.url); const pluginModule = window[config.name]; if (!pluginModule) { throw new Error( `Plugin ${config.name} not found after loading script`, ); } const plugin: Plugin = { ...pluginModule, routes: config.routes.map((route) => { const component = pluginModule[route.component]; if (!component) { throw new Error( `Component ${route.component} not found in plugin ${config.name}`, ); } return { ...route, component, }; }), }; this.register(plugin); } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to load plugin ${config.name}:`, error); } - } + })); }src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigEdit.tsx (3)
38-41: Define a TypeScript interface for theconfigstateDefining an interface for the
configstate enhances type safety and code readability.Here's how you can define the interface:
+interface PlugConfig { + slug: string; + meta: string; +} const [config, setConfig] = useState({ slug: "", meta: `{}`, }); +const [config, setConfig] = useState<PlugConfig>({ + slug: "", + meta: `{}`, +});
142-150: Enhance the JSON editing experience for the Meta fieldThe Meta field currently uses a plain textarea, which may not provide the best user experience for editing JSON. Consider integrating a JSON editor component that offers syntax highlighting, validation, and formatting assistance to help users input valid JSON.
129-137: Disable the Slug field when editing an existing configurationChanging the slug of an existing configuration might lead to unintended consequences or complicate data consistency. Consider disabling the slug input field when editing an existing configuration to prevent accidental changes.
Apply this diff to conditionally disable the slug field:
<Input value={config.slug} onChange={(e) => setConfig((prev) => ({ ...prev, slug: e.target.value, })) } required + disabled={!isNew} />vite.config.mts (2)
113-113: Externalize the hardcoded remote URL forcare_livekitThe
externalURL for thecare_livekitremote is hardcoded as"http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js". To enhance flexibility and maintainability across different environments (development, staging, production), consider externalizing this URL into an environment variable or configuration file. This approach allows for easier updates without modifying the source code directly.
231-237: Clarify special handling of 'tiny-invariant' inmanualChunksIn the
manualChunksfunction, there is a special case for thetiny-invariantpackage:if (/tiny-invariant/.test(id)) { return "vendor"; }This exception forces
tiny-invariantinto the generalvendorchunk, differing from how other dependencies are chunked by package name. To maintain consistency and improve readability, consider:
- Providing a comment explaining the rationale behind this special handling.
- Evaluating if this exception is necessary, and if not, removing it to unify the chunking strategy.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
.cursorrules(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)public/locale/en.json(3 hunks)src/App.tsx(1 hunks)src/PluginEngine.tsx(2 hunks)src/PluginRegistry.ts(1 hunks)src/Routers/AppRouter.tsx(5 hunks)src/Utils/AuthorizeFor.tsx(2 hunks)src/Utils/request/api.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Patient/PatientRegister.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/card.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/input.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/label.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/table.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/textarea.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigEdit.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigList.tsx(1 hunks)src/types/care_livekit.d.ts(1 hunks)src/types/plugConfig.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)vite.config.mts(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .gitignore
- src/types/care_livekit.d.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx
[failure] 1-1:
Delete import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Insert import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 4-4:
Insert ⏎
src/components/ui/label.tsx
[failure] 1-1:
Delete import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Replace ·cva,·type·VariantProps·}·from·"class-variance-authority with ·type·VariantProps,·cva·}·from·"class-variance-authority";⏎import·*·as·React·from·"react
🔇 Additional comments (40)
src/types/plugConfig.ts (1)
1-4: Verify microfrontend integration requirements
As this is part of a microfrontends implementation, we should ensure this configuration structure aligns with common microfrontend patterns and requirements.
Let's check for any existing microfrontend-related configurations or documentation:
Consider these architectural recommendations:
- Add support for module federation configuration if using Webpack 5
- Include fields for versioning and dependency management
- Consider adding fields for runtime configuration and feature flags
src/components/ui/label.tsx (1)
24-24: LGTM!
The export pattern is clean and follows best practices.
tsconfig.json (1)
26-26: Verify the types directory structure
Let's verify that the types directory exists and is being used correctly for the LiveKit integration.
✅ Verification successful
Type mapping in tsconfig.json is correctly configured for microfrontend integration
The type mapping for "care_livekit/*" is correctly set up and aligns with the microfrontend architecture:
- The type definition in
src/types/care_livekit.d.tsis minimal and only declares the remote component interface - The component is properly imported and used as a microfrontend in
PluginEngine.tsx - The configuration is consistent with the remote entry setup in
vite.config.mts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the types directory exists and contains LiveKit-related files
fd . src/types -t f -x echo "Found type file: {}"
# Check for any LiveKit-related imports in the codebase
rg "from ['|\"]care_livekit/" -A 2
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of care_livekit.d.ts to understand the type definitions
cat src/types/care_livekit.d.ts
# Look for any other LiveKit-related files or configurations
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' 'livekit' -i
Length of output: 887
src/components/ui/textarea.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-organized, importing only the necessary dependencies.
22-24: LGTM! Proper component naming.
The display name is correctly set for better debugging experience.
src/components/ui/input.tsx (2)
23-25: LGTM!
The component export and displayName setup follow React best practices.
1-3: Verify the cn utility implementation
The component relies on the cn utility from @/lib/utils. Let's ensure it's properly implemented.
✅ Verification successful
The cn utility is properly implemented and consistently used
The cn utility is correctly implemented in src/lib/utils.ts as a function that combines Tailwind classes using clsx and tailwind-merge. It's consistently imported and used across multiple UI components for className management, following the same pattern as the input component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the cn utility implementation
# Expected: Find the cn utility implementation and its usage pattern
# Check for the cn utility implementation
rg -p "export.*cn.*=" "src/lib/utils"
# Check for consistent usage pattern across the codebase
rg -p "cn\(" "src/components"
Length of output: 2630
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the cn utility in the entire codebase since it wasn't found in src/lib/utils
rg -p "export.*cn.*="
# Also search for any file named utils.ts or utils.js
fd "utils\.(ts|js)$"
Length of output: 529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of src/lib/utils.ts since it's the most likely location
cat src/lib/utils.ts
# Also check if there are any other files importing cn from this utils file
rg -p "import.*\{.*cn.*\}.*from.*utils"
Length of output: 1112
src/Utils/AuthorizeFor.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM!
The import statement correctly references the new ErrorPage component from its new location.
50-50: Verify ErrorPage component interface and usage patterns
Let's ensure we're using the ErrorPage component consistently with other occurrences in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
ErrorPage usage is consistent with its interface
The current usage <ErrorPage /> is correct as the component has an optional forError prop that defaults to "PAGE_NOT_FOUND". This matches the component's interface and is consistent with other usages in the codebase where the prop is either omitted (defaulting to "PAGE_NOT_FOUND") or explicitly set to "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR".
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check ErrorPage component interface and usage patterns
# Find the ErrorPage component definition
echo "=== ErrorPage Component Definition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $interface {
$$$
}' src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx
echo "\n=== ErrorPage Usage Patterns ==="
# Find all ErrorPage usages to verify prop patterns
rg -A 1 "<ErrorPage"
Length of output: 1005
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual ErrorPage component definition and its props
echo "=== ErrorPage Component Definition ==="
rg -A 10 "^(export )?(\bconst\b|\bfunction\b|\binterface\b) ErrorPage"
# Also check if there are any type definitions for ErrorPage props
echo "\n=== ErrorPage Props Type Definition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $interface {
forError?: $_
$$$
}'
# Let's also check the actual implementation to understand default behavior
echo "\n=== ErrorPage Implementation ==="
rg -A 5 "function ErrorPage|const ErrorPage"
Length of output: 1629
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the ErrorType definition to understand valid values
echo "=== ErrorType Definition ==="
rg "type ErrorType = " -A 5
# Let's also check if there are any other error-related types or constants
echo "\n=== Error-related Constants ==="
rg "PAGE_NOT_FOUND|PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" -A 1
Length of output: 1349
src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx (2)
13-15: LGTM! Component signature is well-defined.
The component definition follows React best practices with proper TypeScript typing and default prop values.
13-15: Verify all Error404 component references are updated.
The component has been renamed from Error404 to ErrorPage. Let's verify that all references have been updated across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
All Error404 references have been successfully updated to ErrorPage
Based on the search results:
- No remaining references to "Error404" were found in the codebase
- All imports and usages of ErrorPage component are consistent with the new implementation
- The component is properly used across multiple files with the correct props interface
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to Error404
echo "Checking for remaining Error404 references..."
rg "Error404"
# Search for ErrorPage usage to verify correct props
echo -e "\nChecking ErrorPage usage..."
rg -A 2 "ErrorPage"
Length of output: 3642
.cursorrules (1)
17-18: Verify the navigation documentation
The reference to BaseNavItems and StatelessSidebar needs verification as it might be outdated based on the AI summary mentioning structural changes.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation accurately reflects the current codebase structure
The documentation is correct as both StatelessSidebar component and BaseNavItems are present in /src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx. The code shows that BaseNavItems is defined as an array of navigation items within the StatelessSidebar component, exactly as documented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if the StatelessSidebar component and BaseNavItems still exist
ast-grep --pattern 'const BaseNavItems' -l
rg -l "StatelessSidebar" "src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx"
Length of output: 259
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for BaseNavItems and StatelessSidebar in the Sidebar component
ast-grep --pattern 'const BaseNavItems' --lang typescript
rg "StatelessSidebar" "src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx" -A 2
Length of output: 521
src/PluginEngine.tsx (1)
29-31: Review CareLivekit integration approach
The current implementation has several potential issues:
- CareLivekit is rendered unconditionally, which might not be desired
- Nested Suspense boundary might be redundant
- No configuration or props are passed to CareLivekit
Let's verify the CareLivekit component's requirements:
Consider conditionally rendering based on configuration and consolidating Suspense boundaries:
- <Suspense fallback={<Loading />}>
- <CareLivekit />
- </Suspense>
+ {shouldRenderCareLivekit && (
+ <RemoteComponentErrorBoundary>
+ <CareLivekit
+ config={careLivekitConfig}
+ onError={handleCareLivekitError}
+ />
+ </RemoteComponentErrorBoundary>
+ )}src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigList.tsx (1)
38-60: Consider adding pagination for large datasets
The table currently renders all configurations at once, which might cause performance issues with large datasets. Consider implementing pagination or infinite scroll.
src/components/ui/card.tsx (3)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.
The imports are appropriate and well-organized.
44-54: LGTM! Well-implemented description component.
The component has proper typing, styling, and dark mode support.
76-83: LGTM! Clean and organized exports.
All components are properly exported.
src/components/ui/table.tsx (2)
111-120: LGTM! Clean and well-organized exports
The exports are properly structured and follow a logical order matching the implementation.
1-4: Verify path alias configuration
The "@/" path alias is used for importing utilities. Ensure this alias is properly configured in the TypeScript and build configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Path alias configuration is properly set up
The @/ path alias is correctly configured in tsconfig.json to map to ./src/*, ensuring the import @/lib/utils will resolve correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for path alias configuration in tsconfig
fd -e json tsconfig && cat tsconfig*.json | jq '.compilerOptions.paths'
# Check for path alias in build config
fd -e js -e ts -e json "webpack|vite|next" -d 1 && cat webpack*.js vite*.ts next*.js 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 448
src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx (6)
13-27: LGTM! Well-structured overlay component.
The implementation follows React best practices with:
- Proper ref forwarding
- Strong TypeScript typing
- Well-structured animation classes
46-72: LGTM! Well-implemented layout components.
The Header and Footer components are well-structured with:
- Clean TypeScript types
- Responsive design considerations
- Proper flex layouts for different screen sizes
74-98: LGTM! Well-implemented typography components.
The Title and Description components follow best practices with proper ref forwarding and consistent typography styling.
99-125: LGTM! Well-implemented action components.
The Action and Cancel components are well-integrated with the design system's button variants and have proper responsive styling.
127-139: LGTM! Clean and complete exports.
All necessary components are exported with a clean and organized syntax.
1-139: Verify microfrontend integration approach.
As this PR is experimenting with microfrontends, let's verify the integration approach for this shared UI component.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 1-1:
Delete import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Insert import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 4-4:
Insert ⏎
src/Routers/AppRouter.tsx (4)
7-7: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized
The new imports are logically grouped and follow consistent naming conventions.
Also applies to: 14-14, 31-32
65-65: LGTM: Improved error handling with ErrorPage
The transition from Error404 to ErrorPage provides more flexible error handling capabilities.
Also applies to: 88-88
171-175: LGTM: Well-placed ErrorBoundary implementation
The ErrorBoundary is correctly placed to catch rendering errors in the page content area. The fallback UI using ErrorPage with "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" provides good user feedback.
Let's verify the ErrorPage component's capabilities:
✅ Verification successful
ErrorBoundary and ErrorPage implementation verified successfully
The ErrorPage component properly supports the "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" type with appropriate error content, including:
- Proper type definition with "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" as a valid ErrorType
- Dedicated error content with translated title and message
- Clean UI with an image, heading, message, and a return link
- Proper cleanup of notifications on mount
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check ErrorPage implementation for supported error types
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = {
$$$
forError: $_
$$$
}' src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx
Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the ErrorPage component and its implementation
fd ErrorPage --type f --exec ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
forError: $_
$$$
}'
# Also search for any ErrorPage component definition
fd ErrorPage --type f --exec ast-grep --pattern 'const ErrorPage = $_'
# Backup search using ripgrep to find any ErrorPage related files and their content
rg -l "ErrorPage" --type tsx --type ts | xargs cat
Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ErrorPage files
fd ErrorPage
# Search for files containing ErrorPage references
rg "ErrorPage" --type ts
# Try to find the specific error type PAGE_LOAD_ERROR
rg "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" --type ts
Length of output: 1864
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the DefaultErrorPage implementation to verify the error handling
cat src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx
Length of output: 1455
71-72: Consider adding route-level authorization checks
The new plug config routes might need access control. Consider wrapping them with an authorization component similar to other protected routes in the application.
Also, ensure proper navigation handling between the list and edit views.
Let's check if other routes use authorization wrappers:
package.json (1)
59-59: Verify Vite plugin federation version compatibility
The @originjs/vite-plugin-federation is crucial for microfrontend implementation. Consider upgrading to the latest version (1.3.7) for bug fixes and improvements.
Ensure your Vite configuration properly sets up the module federation for the care_livekit remote module. This is critical for:
- Proper chunk loading
- Shared dependencies management
- Runtime integration
src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (2)
Line range hint 1-67: LGTM: Existing plugin support is well-suited for microfrontends
The existing code structure, particularly the use of useCareAppNavItems and the way navigation items are composed, provides a good foundation for microfrontend integration:
const PluginNavItems = useCareAppNavItems();
const NavItems = [...BaseNavItems, ...PluginNavItems];67-67: Verify the new route and its dependencies
The new navigation item for app settings needs verification of its dependencies:
- The route "/apps"
- The translation key "app_settings"
- The icon "l-setting"
✅ Verification successful
All dependencies for the new navigation item are verified
The verification results confirm that all required dependencies are properly set up:
- Route "/apps" is defined in AppRouter.tsx and maps to
<PlugConfigList /> - Translation key "app_settings" exists and translates to "App Settings"
- Icon "l-setting" is defined in UniconPaths.json
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for route definition
echo "Checking route definition..."
rg -A 3 '"/apps"' src/Routers/
# Check for translation key
echo "Checking translation key..."
fd -e json . public/locale/ -x jq -r '.app_settings // empty' {}
# Check for icon usage
echo "Checking icon definition..."
rg "l-setting" src/CAREUI/icons/
Length of output: 616
src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx (2)
9-9: Verify consistent error page usage across the codebase
The change from Error404 to ErrorPage aligns with the standardization of error handling.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Error page migration is consistent and properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The ErrorPage component accepts an optional
forErrorprop with type "PAGE_NOT_FOUND" | "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" - No instances of the old Error404 component remain in the codebase
- The usage in ConsultationDetails matches other implementations where ErrorPage is used without props (defaulting to "PAGE_NOT_FOUND")
- The change is part of a consistent error handling pattern across the application
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining Error404 imports
rg "import.*Error404.*from.*ErrorPages/404"
# Check for ErrorPage usage pattern
rg "import.*ErrorPage.*from.*ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage"
Length of output: 509
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of DefaultErrorPage to understand expected props
ast-grep --pattern 'const DefaultErrorPage = ($_) => { $$$ }'
# Check how ErrorPage is being used in other files
rg "ErrorPage" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 5309
189-189: Verify ErrorPage props requirements
The ErrorPage component is rendered without props. Let's ensure this is the intended usage.
Let's check the ErrorPage component's implementation:
✅ Verification successful
ErrorPage requires optional forError prop which defaults to "PAGE_NOT_FOUND"
The ErrorPage component accepts an optional forError prop of type ErrorType which defaults to "PAGE_NOT_FOUND" if not provided. The current usage without props is valid as it will use this default value. The component is properly implemented to handle this case and will display the 404 error page with appropriate image, title, and message.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and examine the ErrorPage component definition
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function DefaultErrorPage($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different patterns to find ErrorPage component
ast-grep --pattern 'function ErrorPage($_) {
$$$
}'
# Also search for ErrorPage as a component
ast-grep --pattern 'const ErrorPage = $_'
# Backup search using ripgrep
rg "ErrorPage" -A 5
Length of output: 9420
src/Utils/request/api.tsx (1)
93-93: LGTM!
The import statement follows the existing pattern and is properly placed with other type imports.
src/components/Patient/PatientRegister.tsx (2)
87-90: LGTM! Import changes look good.
The switch to relative paths for local imports is a good practice, making the code more maintainable and easier to refactor.
831-831: LGTM! Error handling improvement.
The replacement of Error404 with ErrorPage provides a more appropriate error handling mechanism for permission-related issues.
public/locale/en.json (1)
318-318: LGTM! The new translations are well-structured and consistent.
The added translations follow the established patterns and best practices:
- Keys follow the snake_case naming convention
- Messages are user-friendly and properly formatted
- Entries are in correct alphabetical order
- Error messages provide clear information and reassurance
Also applies to: 517-517, 968-968
src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigEdit.tsx (1)
68-68: Verify navigation routes for consistency after operations
After saving, the user is navigated to /apps, but on cancel, the user is taken to /apps/plug-configs. Please verify if this is intentional or if both actions should navigate to the same route for consistency.
Also applies to: 157-157
vite.config.mts (1)
243-246: Verify browser compatibility with the 'esnext' build target
Setting the build target to "esnext" and disabling polyfills with modulePreload: { polyfill: false } may lead to compatibility issues in browsers that do not fully support the latest ECMAScript features. Ensure that your application's target audience uses browsers compatible with ESNext features. If compatibility with older browsers is required, consider adjusting the target to a more widely supported version, such as "es2015" or "es2017".
| export interface PlugConfig { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| meta: Record<string, any>; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving type safety and documentation
The interface could benefit from the following improvements:
- The
metafield usingRecord<string, any>reduces type safety. Consider defining a more specific type for the metadata structure. - Add JSDoc documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this interface.
Here's a suggested improvement:
+/**
+ * Configuration interface for microfrontend plugins
+ * @property slug - Unique identifier for the plugin
+ * @property meta - Plugin-specific configuration metadata
+ * @example
+ * {
+ * slug: "patient-dashboard",
+ * meta: {
+ * version: "1.0.0",
+ * entry: "./index.js",
+ * dependencies: ["@ohc/core"]
+ * }
+ * }
+ */
export interface PlugConfig {
slug: string;
- meta: Record<string, any>;
+ meta: {
+ version: string;
+ entry: string;
+ dependencies?: string[];
+ [key: string]: unknown;
+ };
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface PlugConfig { | |
| slug: string; | |
| meta: Record<string, any>; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Configuration interface for microfrontend plugins | |
| * @property slug - Unique identifier for the plugin | |
| * @property meta - Plugin-specific configuration metadata | |
| * @example | |
| * { | |
| * slug: "patient-dashboard", | |
| * meta: { | |
| * version: "1.0.0", | |
| * entry: "./index.js", | |
| * dependencies: ["@ohc/core"] | |
| * } | |
| * } | |
| */ | |
| export interface PlugConfig { | |
| slug: string; | |
| meta: { | |
| version: string; | |
| entry: string; | |
| dependencies?: string[]; | |
| [key: string]: unknown; | |
| }; | |
| } |
| {/* <Routers.AppRouter /> */} | ||
| <div>Hello</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Restore router functionality
Commenting out <Routers.AppRouter /> and replacing it with a static div breaks core application functionality including:
- Authentication flows
- Navigation
- Protected routes
- Error boundaries
Either:
- Restore the router:
-{/* <Routers.AppRouter /> */}
-<div>Hello</div>
+<Routers.AppRouter />- Or if this is temporary development code, add a TODO comment explaining the intent and timeline:
-{/* <Routers.AppRouter /> */}
-<div>Hello</div>
+{/* TODO: Temporary removal of router for microfrontend testing.
+ Will be restored in follow-up PR #XXXX */}
+<div>Hello</div>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {/* <Routers.AppRouter /> */} | |
| <div>Hello</div> | |
| <Routers.AppRouter /> | |
| ``` | |
| And here's the code suggestion for the second option (adding TODO comment): | |
| ```suggestion | |
| {/* TODO: Temporary removal of router for microfrontend testing. | |
| Will be restored in follow-up PR #XXXX */} | |
| <div>Hello</div> |
| Care uses a custom useQuery hook to fetch data from the API. API routes are defined in the api.tsx file like: | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| useQuery from "@/common/hooks/useQuery"; | ||
| routes = { | ||
| createScribe: { | ||
| path: "/api/care_scribe/scribe/", | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| TReq: Type<ScribeModel>(), | ||
| TRes: Type<ScribeModel>(), | ||
| }, | ||
| ...otherRoutes | ||
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Here's an example of how to use the useQuery hook to fetch data from the API | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| import useQuery from "@/Utils/request/useQuery"; | ||
| const { data, loading, error } = useQuery(routes.getFacilityUsers, { | ||
| facility_id: "1", | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
API documentation needs type safety improvements
The API route definition example could be enhanced:
- The
Type<ScribeModel>()syntax seems non-standard - Missing error response type definition
- No explanation of the
routesobject structure
Consider updating to:
interface ApiRoute<TReq, TRes> {
path: string;
method: 'GET' | 'POST' | 'PUT' | 'DELETE';
TReq: TReq;
TRes: TRes;
}
const routes = {
createScribe: {
path: "/api/care_scribe/scribe/",
method: "POST",
TReq: ScribeModel,
TRes: ScribeModel,
} as ApiRoute<ScribeModel, ScribeModel>,
// ...otherRoutes
};| // Import the remote component synchronously | ||
| const CareLivekit = React.lazy(() => import("care_livekit/CareLivekit")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix misleading comment and enhance error handling for remote module
The comment "Import the remote component synchronously" is incorrect as React.lazy() performs asynchronous loading. Additionally, consider adding specific error handling for module loading failures.
Consider these improvements:
-// Import the remote component synchronously
+// Dynamically import the remote component
const CareLivekit = React.lazy(() => import("care_livekit/CareLivekit"));
+
+// Add specific error boundary for remote component loading
+const RemoteComponentErrorBoundary: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode }> = ({ children }) => (
+ <ErrorBoundary
+ fallback={
+ <div className="text-red-500">
+ Failed to load remote component. Please try refreshing the page.
+ </div>
+ }
+ >
+ {children}
+ </ErrorBoundary>
+);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <Button | ||
| variant="ghost" | ||
| onClick={() => navigate(`/apps/plug-configs/${config.slug}`)} | ||
| > | ||
| <CareIcon icon="l-pen" /> | ||
| </Button> | ||
| </TableCell> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve edit button accessibility
The edit button lacks proper accessibility attributes and visual feedback.
<Button
variant="ghost"
+ aria-label={`Edit ${config.slug} configuration`}
+ title={`Edit ${config.slug}`}
onClick={() => navigate(`/apps/plug-configs/${config.slug}`)}
>
<CareIcon icon="l-pen" />
+ <span className="sr-only">Edit</span>
</Button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Button | |
| variant="ghost" | |
| onClick={() => navigate(`/apps/plug-configs/${config.slug}`)} | |
| > | |
| <CareIcon icon="l-pen" /> | |
| </Button> | |
| </TableCell> | |
| <Button | |
| variant="ghost" | |
| aria-label={`Edit ${config.slug} configuration`} | |
| title={`Edit ${config.slug}`} | |
| onClick={() => navigate(`/apps/plug-configs/${config.slug}`)} | |
| > | |
| <CareIcon icon="l-pen" /> | |
| <span className="sr-only">Edit</span> | |
| </Button> | |
| </TableCell> |
| plugConfig: { | ||
| listPlugConfigs: { | ||
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/", | ||
| method: "GET", | ||
| TRes: Type<{ configs: PlugConfig[] }>(), | ||
| }, | ||
| getPlugConfig: { | ||
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | ||
| method: "GET", | ||
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | ||
| }, | ||
| createPlugConfig: { | ||
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/", | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| TReq: Type<PlugConfig>(), | ||
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | ||
| }, | ||
| updatePlugConfig: { | ||
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | ||
| method: "PATCH", | ||
| TReq: Type<PlugConfig>(), | ||
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | ||
| }, | ||
| deletePlugConfig: { | ||
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | ||
| method: "DELETE", | ||
| TRes: Type<Record<string, never>>(), | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Maintain consistency in type parameter naming.
The plug config routes use TReq for request body types while the rest of the codebase uses TBody. For consistency, consider using TBody instead of TReq.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
createPlugConfig: {
path: "/api/v1/plug_config/",
method: "POST",
- TReq: Type<PlugConfig>(),
+ TBody: Type<PlugConfig>(),
TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(),
},
updatePlugConfig: {
path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/",
method: "PATCH",
- TReq: Type<PlugConfig>(),
+ TBody: Type<PlugConfig>(),
TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(),
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| plugConfig: { | |
| listPlugConfigs: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/", | |
| method: "GET", | |
| TRes: Type<{ configs: PlugConfig[] }>(), | |
| }, | |
| getPlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | |
| method: "GET", | |
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| }, | |
| createPlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/", | |
| method: "POST", | |
| TReq: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| }, | |
| updatePlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | |
| method: "PATCH", | |
| TReq: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| }, | |
| deletePlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | |
| method: "DELETE", | |
| TRes: Type<Record<string, never>>(), | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| plugConfig: { | |
| listPlugConfigs: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/", | |
| method: "GET", | |
| TRes: Type<{ configs: PlugConfig[] }>(), | |
| }, | |
| getPlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | |
| method: "GET", | |
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| }, | |
| createPlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/", | |
| method: "POST", | |
| TBody: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| }, | |
| updatePlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | |
| method: "PATCH", | |
| TBody: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| TRes: Type<PlugConfig>(), | |
| }, | |
| deletePlugConfig: { | |
| path: "/api/v1/plug_config/{slug}/", | |
| method: "DELETE", | |
| TRes: Type<Record<string, never>>(), | |
| }, | |
| }, |
| private loadScript(url: string): Promise<void> { | ||
| return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | ||
| const script = document.createElement("script"); | ||
| script.src = url; | ||
| script.onload = () => resolve(); | ||
| script.onerror = () => reject(new Error(`Failed to load script: ${url}`)); | ||
| document.head.appendChild(script); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address potential security risks in dynamic script loading
Dynamically loading scripts from external URLs without proper validation can introduce security vulnerabilities such as XSS attacks. Consider validating the url parameter to ensure it comes from a trusted source and implement security measures like Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate risks. Additionally, you might explore using import() for dynamic imports if applicable.
| (window as any).React = React; | ||
| (window as any).ReactDOM = ReactDOM; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid polluting the global window object with React and ReactDOM
Assigning React and ReactDOM to the global window object can lead to conflicts and unexpected behavior, especially if other scripts manipulate these properties or if multiple versions are used. Consider passing React and ReactDOM as dependencies to your plugins or using a shared module system to manage these libraries.
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error saving config:", error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Provide user feedback on errors during save and delete operations
Currently, errors in the save and delete operations are logged to the console but not communicated to the user. Consider displaying an error message to inform the user that the operation failed.
Apply this diff to display error messages:
+const [errorMessage, setErrorMessage] = useState("");
const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => {
e.preventDefault();
// ... existing code ...
try {
// ... existing code ...
navigate("/apps");
+ setErrorMessage("");
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error saving config:", error);
+ setErrorMessage("Failed to save configuration. Please try again.");
}
};
const handleDelete = async () => {
try {
// ... existing code ...
navigate("/apps");
+ setErrorMessage("");
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error deleting config:", error);
+ setErrorMessage("Failed to delete configuration. Please try again.");
}
};
+// In the render method, display the error message if it exists
+{errorMessage && (
+ <div className="mb-4 text-red-600">
+ {errorMessage}
+ </div>
+)}Also applies to: 80-82
| const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| // Meta is parsed to a JSON object to clear whitespaces when saving | ||
| const meta = JSON.parse(config.meta); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle JSON parsing errors for the Meta field
When parsing config.meta, if the input is invalid JSON, JSON.parse will throw an error, which is not currently caught. This may cause the application to crash or fail silently. Consider adding error handling to inform the user about invalid JSON input.
Apply this diff to handle parsing errors:
const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => {
e.preventDefault();
- const meta = JSON.parse(config.meta);
+ let meta;
+ try {
+ meta = JSON.parse(config.meta);
+ } catch (parseError) {
+ console.error("Invalid JSON in Meta:", parseError);
+ // Display an error message to the user
+ // You could set an error state and display it in the UI
+ return;
+ }
const configPayload = { ...config, meta };
try {
if (isNew) {
await request(routes.plugConfig.createPlugConfig, {
body: configPayload,
});
} else {
await request(routes.plugConfig.updatePlugConfig, {
pathParams: { slug },
body: configPayload,
});
}
navigate("/apps");
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error saving config:", error);
}
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (36)
src/types/plugConfig.ts (1)
2-2: Add validation constraints for the slug propertyThe
slugproperty should have format constraints to ensure valid identifiers.Consider using a more specific type:
- slug: string; + slug: `${string}-plugin`; // Template literal type ensuring "-plugin" suffixOr add runtime validation if using a validation library like Zod:
import { z } from 'zod'; export const PlugConfigSchema = z.object({ slug: z.string().regex(/^[a-z0-9]+(?:-[a-z0-9]+)*-plugin$/), // ... rest of the schema });src/types/care_livekit.d.ts (1)
1-4: Consider adding proper prop types and documentation.While the basic type declaration works, it could be improved for better type safety and maintainability:
- The component type is currently very generic. Consider defining an interface for the component's props if any are required.
- Documentation about the component's purpose and usage would be helpful.
declare module "care_livekit/CareLivekit" { + interface CareLivekitProps { + // TODO: Add expected props here + } + + /** + * CareLivekit Component + * @description Add component description here + */ - const CareLivekit: React.ComponentType; + const CareLivekit: React.ComponentType<CareLivekitProps>; export default CareLivekit; }src/components/ui/label.tsx (2)
1-5: Consider using specific imports instead of wildcardsWhile the code works as is, using specific imports instead of wildcards (
import * as) would make dependencies more explicit and could potentially help with tree-shaking.-import * as React from "react"; -import * as LabelPrimitive from "@radix-ui/react-label"; +import { forwardRef } from "react"; +import { Root as LabelRoot } from "@radix-ui/react-label";🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 1-1:
Deleteimport·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Replace·cva,·type·VariantProps·}·from·"class-variance-authoritywith·type·VariantProps,·cva·}·from·"class-variance-authority";⏎import·*·as·React·from·"react
7-9: Consider adding size and style variants for better flexibilityThe current implementation only provides a single style variant. Consider adding size and style variants to make the component more versatile.
const labelVariants = cva( "text-sm font-medium leading-none peer-disabled:cursor-not-allowed peer-disabled:opacity-70", + { + variants: { + size: { + default: "text-sm", + small: "text-xs", + large: "text-base" + }, + variant: { + default: "font-medium", + bold: "font-bold", + light: "font-light" + } + }, + defaultVariants: { + size: "default", + variant: "default" + } + } );tsconfig.json (1)
26-26: Consider following consistent naming conventions for path aliasesThe new path alias
care_livekituses underscores, while other aliases use camelCase (e.g.,@careConfig). Consider maintaining consistency:- "care_livekit/*": ["src/types/*"] + "@careLivekit/*": ["src/types/*"]src/components/ui/textarea.tsx (2)
5-6: Add JSDoc documentation for better developer experienceConsider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the interface and its usage.
+/** + * Props for the Textarea component. + * Extends the standard HTML textarea element props. + */ export interface TextareaProps extends React.TextareaHTMLAttributes<HTMLTextAreaElement> {}
12-15: Improve className maintainabilityConsider breaking down the long className string into logical groups for better maintainability.
- className={cn( - "flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-gray-200 bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-sm shadow-sm placeholder:text-gray-500 focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-gray-950 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 dark:border-gray-800 dark:placeholder:text-gray-400 dark:focus-visible:ring-gray-300", - className, - )} + className={cn( + // Base layout + "flex min-h-[60px] w-full", + // Appearance + "rounded-md border border-gray-200 bg-transparent", + "px-3 py-2 text-sm shadow-sm", + // States + "placeholder:text-gray-500", + "focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-gray-950", + "disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50", + // Dark mode + "dark:border-gray-800 dark:placeholder:text-gray-400 dark:focus-visible:ring-gray-300", + className + )}src/components/ui/input.tsx (3)
5-6: Add JSDoc documentation for the InputProps interfaceConsider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose and usage of the interface.
+/** + * Props for the Input component. + * Extends the standard HTML input attributes. + */ export interface InputProps extends React.InputHTMLAttributes<HTMLInputElement> {}
8-22: Consider extracting Tailwind classes and enhancing type safetyThe implementation is solid, but could benefit from these improvements:
- Extract the Tailwind classes to a constant for better maintainability
- Add type validation for the 'type' prop
+const inputStyles = "flex h-9 w-full rounded-md border border-gray-200 bg-transparent px-3 py-1 text-sm shadow-sm transition-colors file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-gray-950 placeholder:text-gray-500 focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-gray-950 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 dark:border-gray-800 dark:file:text-gray-50 dark:placeholder:text-gray-400 dark:focus-visible:ring-gray-300"; + +type InputType = 'text' | 'password' | 'email' | 'number' | 'tel' | 'url' | 'search'; + const Input = React.forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, InputProps>( - ({ className, type, ...props }, ref) => { + ({ className, type = 'text', ...props }, ref) => { return ( <input - type={type} - className={cn( - "flex h-9 w-full rounded-md border border-gray-200 bg-transparent px-3 py-1 text-sm shadow-sm transition-colors file:border-0 file:bg-transparent file:text-sm file:font-medium file:text-gray-950 placeholder:text-gray-500 focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-gray-950 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 dark:border-gray-800 dark:file:text-gray-50 dark:placeholder:text-gray-400 dark:focus-visible:ring-gray-300", - className, - )} + type={type as InputType} + className={cn(inputStyles, className)} ref={ref} {...props} />
1-25: Consider documenting microfrontend integration guidelinesAs this component is part of a shared UI library in a microfrontend architecture:
- Document how other microfrontends should import and use this component
- Consider adding usage examples
- Define versioning strategy for breaking changes
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for this?
src/App.tsx (1)
24-24: Remove commented codeInstead of commenting out code, either remove it entirely or use version control to track changes. Commented code can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.
src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx (2)
7-11: Consider making error types more maintainableThe type system is well-structured, but consider making it more maintainable for future error types:
-type ErrorType = "PAGE_NOT_FOUND" | "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR"; +// Define as const to enable type inference and maintainability +const ERROR_TYPES = { + PAGE_NOT_FOUND: "PAGE_NOT_FOUND", + PAGE_LOAD_ERROR: "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR", +} as const; +type ErrorType = typeof ERROR_TYPES[keyof typeof ERROR_TYPES];This approach provides better type safety, enables autocompletion, and centralizes error type management.
22-33: Consider distinct visuals for different error typesCurrently, both error types use the same image (
404.svg). Consider using distinct visuals to help users better understand different error scenarios.const errorContent = { PAGE_NOT_FOUND: { image: "/images/404.svg", title: t("page_not_found"), message: t("404_message"), }, PAGE_LOAD_ERROR: { - image: "/images/404.svg", + image: "/images/error.svg", // Consider a different image for load errors title: t("page_load_error"), message: t("could_not_load_page"), }, };.cursorrules (3)
7-8: Consider distributed routing for microfrontendsThe current centralized routing approach in
AppRouter.tsxmight not be optimal for microfrontends. Consider:
- Implementing federated routing where each microfrontend manages its own routes
- Documenting how route conflicts between microfrontends are resolved
- Explaining the integration between microfrontend-specific routes and the main application router
9-15: Enhance icon documentation for microfrontend contextThe icon usage example is clear, but please add:
- How icons are shared across different microfrontends
- Whether CareIcon is part of a shared component library
- Guidelines for icon consistency across microfrontends
17-18: Clarify navigation integration strategy for microfrontendsThe current navigation structure seems centralized. Please document:
- How navigation items from different microfrontends are integrated
- The strategy for handling dynamic navigation updates when microfrontends are loaded/unloaded
- How navigation state is shared across microfrontends
src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigList.tsx (3)
1-19: Consider organizing imports more systematically.The imports could be better organized into clear groups with consistent spacing:
- External libraries
- UI Components/Icons
- Common Components
- Utils/Types
import { navigate } from "raviger"; - import CareIcon from "@/CAREUI/icons/CareIcon"; - import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button"; import { Table, TableBody, TableCell, TableHead, TableHeader, TableRow, } from "@/components/ui/table"; - import Loading from "@/components/Common/Loading"; - import routes from "@/Utils/request/api"; import useQuery from "@/Utils/request/useQuery"; import { PlugConfig } from "@/types/plugConfig"; +
28-36: Add aria-label to improve accessibility.The header section needs accessibility improvements for screen readers.
- <div className="mb-4 flex items-center justify-between"> + <div className="mb-4 flex items-center justify-between" role="banner"> - <h1 className="text-2xl font-bold">Plug Configs</h1> + <h1 className="text-2xl font-bold" id="plug-configs-title">Plug Configs</h1> - <Button onClick={() => navigate("/apps/plug-configs/new")}> + <Button + onClick={() => navigate("/apps/plug-configs/new")} + aria-label="Add new plug configuration" + >
50-56: Add tooltip and keyboard navigation for the edit button.The edit button needs accessibility improvements and user feedback.
<Button variant="ghost" + title={`Edit ${config.slug}`} onClick={() => navigate(`/apps/plug-configs/${config.slug}`)} + onKeyDown={(e) => { + if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') { + navigate(`/apps/plug-configs/${config.slug}`); + } + }} > - <CareIcon icon="l-pen" /> + <CareIcon icon="l-pen" aria-hidden="true" /> + <span className="sr-only">Edit {config.slug}</span> </Button>src/components/ui/card.tsx (3)
5-18: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA role for better accessibilityThe Card component implementation is clean and follows best practices. The styling is well-structured with dark mode support.
Consider adding an ARIA role for better accessibility:
<div ref={ref} className={cn( "rounded-xl border border-gray-200 bg-white text-gray-950 shadow dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 dark:text-gray-50", className, )} + role="article" {...props} />
20-74: Consider enforcing semantic structure through compositionThe current implementation allows subcomponents to be used independently, which might lead to inconsistent card structures.
Consider implementing a compound component pattern to enforce proper semantic structure:
interface CardComposition { Header: typeof CardHeader; Title: typeof CardTitle; Description: typeof CardDescription; Content: typeof CardContent; Footer: typeof CardFooter; } const Card = React.forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>>( ({ className, ...props }, ref) => { // ... existing implementation } ) as React.ForwardRefExoticComponent<React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>> & CardComposition; Card.Header = CardHeader; Card.Title = CardTitle; // ... assign other subcomponentsThis would encourage usage like:
<Card> <Card.Header> <Card.Title>Title</Card.Title> <Card.Description>Description</Card.Description> </Card.Header> <Card.Content>Content</Card.Content> <Card.Footer>Footer</Card.Footer> </Card>
76-83: Consider matching export order with component declaration orderFor better maintainability, consider ordering exports to match their declaration order in the file.
export { Card, CardHeader, - CardFooter, CardTitle, CardDescription, CardContent, + CardFooter, };src/components/ui/table.tsx (2)
5-18: Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibilityThe Table component implementation looks good, with proper typing and overflow handling. Consider enhancing accessibility by adding appropriate ARIA attributes.
<div className="relative w-full overflow-auto"> <table ref={ref} className={cn("w-full caption-bottom text-sm", className)} + role="grid" + aria-label="Data table" {...props} /> </div>
1-120: Consider adding documentation and examplesWhile the implementation is solid and aligns well with microfrontend architecture, the component system would benefit from:
- JSDoc documentation for each component describing its usage
- A README.md with examples of common table patterns
- Integration tests for common use cases
This would improve maintainability and help other teams adopt these components in their microfrontends.
src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx (1)
28-44: Consider extracting complex styles into constantsThe content component has a large number of Tailwind classes that could be extracted into a constant or utility function for better maintainability.
+const alertDialogContentStyles = + "fixed left-[50%] top-[50%] z-50 grid w-full max-w-lg translate-x-[-50%] translate-y-[-50%] gap-4 border border-gray-200 bg-white p-6 shadow-lg duration-200 data-[state=open]:animate-in data-[state=closed]:animate-out data-[state=closed]:fade-out-0 data-[state=open]:fade-in-0 data-[state=closed]:zoom-out-95 data-[state=open]:zoom-in-95 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-left-1/2 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-top-[48%] data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-left-1/2 data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-top-[48%] dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 sm:rounded-lg"; const AlertDialogContent = React.forwardRef< React.ElementRef<typeof AlertDialogPrimitive.Content>, React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof AlertDialogPrimitive.Content> >(({ className, ...props }, ref) => ( <AlertDialogPortal> <AlertDialogOverlay /> <AlertDialogPrimitive.Content ref={ref} - className={cn( - "fixed left-[50%] top-[50%] z-50 grid w-full max-w-lg translate-x-[-50%] translate-y-[-50%] gap-4 border border-gray-200 bg-white p-6 shadow-lg duration-200 data-[state=open]:animate-in data-[state=closed]:animate-out data-[state=closed]:fade-out-0 data-[state=open]:fade-in-0 data-[state=closed]:zoom-out-95 data-[state=open]:zoom-in-95 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-left-1/2 data-[state=closed]:slide-out-to-top-[48%] data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-left-1/2 data-[state=open]:slide-in-from-top-[48%] dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-950 sm:rounded-lg", - className - )} + className={cn(alertDialogContentStyles, className)} {...props} /> </AlertDialogPortal> ));src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigEdit.tsx (2)
1-29: Consider organizing imports by categoryThe imports could be better organized into logical groups:
- External dependencies (react, raviger)
- Internal UI components
- Common components
- Utils/Helpers
// External dependencies import { navigate } from "raviger"; import { useEffect, useState } from "react"; // Icons import CareIcon from "@/CAREUI/icons/CareIcon"; // UI Components import { AlertDialog, // ... other alert dialog components } from "@/components/ui/alert-dialog"; import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button"; import { Input } from "@/components/ui/input"; import { Textarea } from "@/components/ui/textarea"; // Common Components import Loading from "@/components/Common/Loading"; // Utils import routes from "@/Utils/request/api"; import request from "@/Utils/request/request"; import useQuery from "@/Utils/request/useQuery";
1-165: Consider architectural improvementsThe component could benefit from several architectural improvements:
- Extract API calls into a separate service layer
- Centralize navigation paths in a routes configuration
- Consider splitting the create and edit functionality into separate components
- Add a custom hook for managing the configuration state and operations
Example service layer structure:
// services/plugConfigService.ts export const plugConfigService = { async getConfig(slug: string) { return request(routes.plugConfig.getPlugConfig, { pathParams: { slug } }); }, async createConfig(config: PlugConfig) { return request(routes.plugConfig.createPlugConfig, { body: config }); }, // ... other methods }; // hooks/usePlugConfig.ts export function usePlugConfig(slug: string) { const [config, setConfig] = useState<PlugConfig>(); const [error, setError] = useState<Error>(); // ... implementation return { config, error, saveConfig, deleteConfig }; }Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track these architectural improvements?
src/Routers/AppRouter.tsx (1)
71-72: Consider implementing route-based code splittingSince you're experimenting with microfrontends, consider implementing route-based code splitting for the plug config routes to improve initial load performance:
const PlugConfigList = lazy(() => import('@/pages/Apps/PlugConfigList')); const PlugConfigEdit = lazy(() => import('@/pages/Apps/PlugConfigEdit'));This would align well with the microfrontends architecture by loading these components only when needed.
src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (1)
67-67: Consider the navigation item placement.The "app_settings" item is placed at the end of the base navigation items. From a UX perspective, settings are typically placed either:
- At the very bottom of the navigation (after all dynamic items)
- In a separate section with other administrative functions
Consider grouping it with other administrative items like "users" for better organization.
src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx (3)
189-189: Consider passing error details to ErrorPageWhile the change to use ErrorPage is good, consider passing specific error information to help users understand why the page failed to load.
- return <ErrorPage />; + return <ErrorPage + title="Invalid Tab" + message={`The selected tab '${props.tab}' is not valid. Available tabs are: ${Object.keys(tabs).join(', ')}`} + />;
Line range hint
71-71: Define proper TypeScript interface for component propsThe component currently accepts
anytype for props, which bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits. Consider defining a proper interface.+interface ConsultationDetailsProps { + facilityId: string; + patientId: string; + consultationId: string; + tab: string; +} -export const ConsultationDetails = (props: any) => { +export const ConsultationDetails = (props: ConsultationDetailsProps) => {
Line range hint
71-391: Consider breaking down the large componentThe component is handling multiple responsibilities and is quite large. Consider extracting some logic into separate components or hooks:
- Tab handling logic could be moved to a custom hook
- Navigation header could be a separate component
- Patient info section could be its own component
This would improve maintainability and testability.
src/Utils/request/api.tsx (1)
1403-1431: Implementation looks good with room for improvementThe plugConfig routes implementation is well-structured with complete CRUD operations. A few suggestions:
- Consider adding query parameters type definitions for the list endpoint
- Consider adding validation for the slug parameter format
- Consider adding type for error responses
Example enhancement for the list endpoint:
listPlugConfigs: { path: "/api/v1/plug_config/", method: "GET", + TQuery: Type<{ + search?: string; + page?: number; + page_size?: number; + }>(), TRes: Type<{ configs: PlugConfig[] }>(), },src/components/Patient/PatientRegister.tsx (2)
87-90: LGTM! Error handling changes look good.The replacement of
Error404withErrorPageand the reorganization of imports improve consistency in error handling across the application.Consider grouping related imports together:
-import ErrorPage from "../ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage"; -import { ILocalBodies } from "../ExternalResult/models"; -import DuplicatePatientDialog from "../Facility/DuplicatePatientDialog"; -import TransferPatientDialog from "../Facility/TransferPatientDialog"; +// Error handling +import ErrorPage from "../ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage"; + +// Models +import { ILocalBodies } from "../ExternalResult/models"; + +// Dialogs +import DuplicatePatientDialog from "../Facility/DuplicatePatientDialog"; +import TransferPatientDialog from "../Facility/TransferPatientDialog";Also applies to: 831-831
Line range hint
1000-1200: Consider enhancing error handling for insurance details submission.While the current implementation is solid, consider adding error boundary protection for the insurance details submission process.
const handleSubmit = async (formData: any) => { setIsLoading(true); + try { await Promise.all( insuranceDetails.map(async (obj) => { const policy = { ...obj, patient: requestData.id, insurer_id: obj.insurer_id || undefined, insurer_name: obj.insurer_name || undefined, }; policy.id ? await request(routes.hcx.policies.update, { pathParams: { external_id: policy.id }, body: policy, }) : await request(routes.hcx.policies.create, { body: policy, }); }), ); + } catch (error) { + Notification.Error({ + msg: "Failed to save insurance details. Please try again.", + }); + console.error("Insurance details submission failed:", error); + } setIsLoading(false); };src/PluginRegistry.ts (1)
34-35: Avoid Usinganyfor Window Object – Extend Window InterfaceUsing
(window as any)bypasses TypeScript's type checking. To maintain type safety, extend theWindowinterface to includeReactandReactDOM.Apply this diff to the affected lines:
- (window as any).React = React; - (window as any).ReactDOM = ReactDOM; + window.React = React; + window.ReactDOM = ReactDOM;Additionally, declare the global
Windowinterface extension outside the class:declare global { interface Window { React: typeof React; ReactDOM: typeof ReactDOM; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
.cursorrules(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)public/locale/en.json(3 hunks)src/App.tsx(1 hunks)src/PluginEngine.tsx(2 hunks)src/PluginRegistry.ts(1 hunks)src/Routers/AppRouter.tsx(5 hunks)src/Utils/AuthorizeFor.tsx(2 hunks)src/Utils/request/api.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Patient/PatientRegister.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/card.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/input.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/label.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/table.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/textarea.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigEdit.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigList.tsx(1 hunks)src/types/care_livekit.d.ts(1 hunks)src/types/plugConfig.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)vite.config.mts(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .gitignore
- public/locale/en.json
- src/Utils/AuthorizeFor.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx
[failure] 1-1:
Delete import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Insert import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 4-4:
Insert ⏎
src/components/ui/label.tsx
[failure] 1-1:
Delete import·*·as·React·from·"react";⏎
[failure] 3-3:
Replace ·cva,·type·VariantProps·}·from·"class-variance-authority with ·type·VariantProps,·cva·}·from·"class-variance-authority";⏎import·*·as·React·from·"react
🔇 Additional comments (39)
src/types/plugConfig.ts (1)
1-4: Consider architectural implications for microfrontends
As this is part of a microfrontends implementation, consider these architectural aspects:
- Plugin isolation: How will the configuration ensure proper isolation between different microfrontends?
- Version management: Should the interface include explicit versioning for both the plugin and its API contract?
- Runtime validation: How will the configuration be validated at runtime to prevent plugin loading failures?
Let's check if there are any existing plugin configurations that might need migration:
src/types/care_livekit.d.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM for basic type safety.
The declaration provides basic type safety for importing the CareLivekit component in TypeScript files.
1-1: Verify module federation configuration.
Since this appears to be a remote module for microfrontend architecture, we should verify the corresponding webpack module federation setup.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Vite configuration since we found a reference to remote entry there.
Module federation configuration is properly set up
The Vite configuration correctly implements module federation for the care_livekit remote module:
- Remote entry point is configured at
http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js - Shared dependencies (React and ReactDOM) are properly configured as singletons
- The module format is set to ESM as expected
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for module federation configuration and remote entry points
# Look for webpack configuration files
echo "Searching for webpack config files..."
fd -e js -e ts webpack.config
# Look for module federation plugin usage
echo "Checking for ModuleFederationPlugin configuration..."
rg -l "ModuleFederationPlugin|remotes.*care_livekit"
# Look for remote entry points
echo "Checking for remote entry point declarations..."
rg -l "remoteEntry.js|care_livekit.*remoteEntry"
Length of output: 458
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Vite configuration for federation setup
echo "Content of vite.config.mts:"
cat vite.config.mts
# Look for any federation-related configuration files
echo -e "\nSearching for federation configuration:"
rg -l "federation|@originjs/vite-plugin-federation"
Length of output: 7677
src/components/ui/label.tsx (1)
11-22: Well-structured component implementation!
The implementation follows React best practices with proper TypeScript typing, ref forwarding, and prop handling. The component is both type-safe and flexible.
tsconfig.json (1)
26-26: Verify the types directory structure
The new path mapping points to src/types/*. Let's ensure this directory exists and contains the necessary type definitions.
✅ Verification successful
Path mapping is correctly configured with existing directory and type definitions
The verification confirms that:
- The
src/typesdirectory exists - The LiveKit type definitions are present at
src/types/care_livekit.d.ts, matching the path mapping configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of types directory and any LiveKit-related type definitions
# Check if the types directory exists and list its contents
fd --type d "types" src/
# Look for any LiveKit-related type definitions
fd --type f ".*livekit.*\.d\.ts$" src/types/
Length of output: 110
src/components/ui/textarea.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports
The import statements are well-organized and follow best practices.
22-24: LGTM! Proper component configuration
The displayName is correctly set and the export syntax is clean.
src/components/ui/input.tsx (2)
23-25: LGTM! Component naming and export follow best practices
The display name is properly set and the export is clean.
1-3: Verify the cn utility implementation
The import path suggests a path alias configuration. Let's ensure the cn utility is properly implemented and exported.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search pattern to locate the cn utility implementation.
Based on the search results, I found the cn utility implementation in one of the files. Let me generate the final response:
The cn utility is properly implemented
The cn utility is correctly implemented as a function that combines clsx and tailwind-merge utilities for class name management. The implementation is found in the codebase and the import path alias @/ is properly configured in tsconfig.json to point to ./src/*.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of cn utility
ast-grep --pattern 'export function cn($$$)' || ast-grep --pattern 'export const cn = $$$'
# Verify the path alias configuration
fd tsconfig.json --exec cat {} | jq -r '.compilerOptions.paths'
Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for cn utility with ripgrep for better context
rg "export.*cn.*=" -A 5
# Also check if it's defined as a type
rg "export.*type.*cn"
# Search in lib/utils.ts specifically since that's the import path
fd utils.ts --exec cat {}
Length of output: 34402
src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx (3)
13-15: LGTM! Clean component definition
The component definition is well-structured with proper TypeScript typing and default prop values.
35-36: Verify styling classes exist in the design system
The implementation looks good, but let's verify that all Tailwind classes used are defined in the project's design system.
Also applies to: 40-41
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual styling classes used in the DefaultErrorPage component and verify them against the Tailwind configuration.
All styling classes are properly defined in the Tailwind configuration
The styling classes used in DefaultErrorPage.tsx (bg-primary-600, hover:bg-primary-700, etc.) are correctly defined in the project's Tailwind configuration. The primary color palette is well-defined with all necessary shades (100-900), and the utility classes for flexbox, spacing, and other properties are part of Tailwind's default utilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the Tailwind classes are defined in the project's configuration
# Search for Tailwind config files
echo "Searching for Tailwind configuration..."
fd -e js -e ts -e json -g "*tailwind*"
# Check for primary color definitions
echo "Checking primary color definitions..."
rg -l "primary-[67]00"
Length of output: 1725
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the styling classes used in DefaultErrorPage
echo "Checking DefaultErrorPage styling..."
cat src/components/ErrorPages/DefaultErrorPage.tsx
# Check Tailwind config
echo -e "\nChecking Tailwind configuration..."
cat tailwind.config.js
Length of output: 3919
25-26: Verify translation keys exist
Let's ensure all required translation keys are properly defined.
Also applies to: 30-31
✅ Verification successful
Translation keys exist and are properly defined
The required translation keys page_not_found and 404_message are properly defined in all the locale files (en, hi, kn, ml, ta) with appropriate translations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify translation keys exist in the locale files
# Check for required translation keys
echo "Checking translation keys in locale files..."
rg -l "page_not_found|404_message|page_load_error|could_not_load_page|return_to_care" public/locale/
Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the actual content of these translation files to ensure they contain all required keys
echo "Checking content of en.json (as reference)..."
cat public/locale/en.json | jq '. | select(.page_not_found != null and .["404_message"] != null)'
echo -e "\nVerifying keys across all locale files..."
for file in public/locale/*.json; do
echo "Checking $file..."
jq 'select(.page_not_found != null and .["404_message"] != null) | [.page_not_found, .["404_message"]]' "$file"
done
Length of output: 72867
.cursorrules (3)
3-5: Documentation needs clarification on microfrontend architecture
Given that this PR is experimenting with microfrontends, please clarify:
- How are microfrontends organized within this structure?
- What are the boundaries between different microfrontends?
- How do shared components work across microfrontends?
Let's verify the current project structure:
Line range hint 42-49: Enhance request utilities documentation
Please add documentation for:
- Error handling and retry strategies
- Request/response interceptors
- How request middleware is shared across microfrontends
Let's check the request utility implementation:
19-40: Document API integration strategy for microfrontends
The API integration example is clear, but please address:
- How API routes are shared/distributed across microfrontends
- Strategy for handling API versioning across different microfrontends
- Authentication/authorization handling across microfrontend boundaries
Let's check for potential API route conflicts:
src/PluginEngine.tsx (2)
29-31: Improve error handling and loading states for microfrontend integration
The current implementation has several architectural concerns:
- Nested Suspense boundaries could lead to confusing loading states
- No specific error boundary for CareLivekit could affect the entire plugin engine
- Loading states might block all children unnecessarily
Consider this improved structure:
<CareAppsContext.Provider value={pluginMap}>
- <Suspense fallback={<Loading />}>
- <CareLivekit />
- </Suspense>
+ <ErrorBoundary
+ fallback={
+ <div className="text-sm text-gray-500">
+ Failed to load video component
+ </div>
+ }
+ >
+ <Suspense fallback={<div className="min-h-[200px]"><Loading /></div>}>
+ <CareLivekit />
+ </Suspense>
+ </ErrorBoundary>
{children}
</CareAppsContext.Provider>Let's verify the impact of this microfrontend integration:
11-12:
Fix misleading comment about synchronous import
The comment indicates a "synchronous import" but React.lazy() is specifically designed for asynchronous loading and code-splitting. This could mislead other developers about the actual loading behavior.
Apply this diff to fix the comment:
-// Import the remote component synchronously
+// Import the remote microfrontend componentLet's verify the remote module configuration:
src/components/ui/card.tsx (1)
1-4: Verify the cn utility implementation
The code relies on the cn utility from @/lib/utils. Let's ensure it's properly implemented for class name composition.
✅ Verification successful
The cn utility is properly implemented
The cn utility is correctly implemented using clsx and tailwind-merge packages, following best practices for class name composition in React components. It combines the functionality of clsx for conditional class names and twMerge for proper Tailwind CSS class merging.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the cn utility implementation
# Expected: Should find a utility function that handles class name composition, likely using clsx or classnames
ast-grep --pattern 'export function cn($_) {
$$$
}'
# Backup search in case the implementation is different
rg -A 5 "export.*cn.*=" src/lib/utils.ts
Length of output: 234
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire utils.ts file and its imports
cat src/lib/utils.ts
# Also check for any imports of clsx and twMerge
rg "import.*(?:clsx|twMerge)" src/lib/utils.ts
Length of output: 323
src/components/ui/table.tsx (3)
99-120: LGTM! Clean implementation and well-organized exports
The TableCaption component and exports section follows best practices with consistent patterns and clear organization.
1-4: Verify the cn utility implementation
The code imports the cn utility which appears to be a class name composition helper. Let's ensure it's properly implemented.
✅ Verification successful
The cn utility is properly implemented
The cn utility is correctly implemented as a class name composition helper that combines clsx and tailwind-merge libraries. It accepts variable class name inputs and merges them efficiently, which is a common best practice for handling Tailwind CSS class combinations in React components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of cn utility
ast-grep --pattern 'export function cn($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check imports and dependencies of cn utility
rg "import.*\{.*clsx.*\}" src/lib/utils.ts
rg "import.*\{.*twMerge.*\}" src/lib/utils.ts
rg "import.*\{.*ClassValue.*\}" src/lib/utils.ts
Length of output: 274
54-98: Enhance type safety and verify checkbox integration
The implementation handles various states and checkbox integration, but could benefit from better type safety.
- Consider adding a type-safe approach for the data-state attribute:
interface TableRowProps extends React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLTableRowElement> {
'data-state'?: 'selected' | 'default';
}
const TableRow = React.forwardRef<HTMLTableRowElement, TableRowProps>Let's verify the checkbox integration:
src/components/ui/alert-dialog.tsx (5)
46-72: LGTM! Well-structured responsive components
The Header and Footer components are well-implemented with proper responsive design and semantic HTML.
127-139: LGTM! Clean and organized exports
All components are properly exported in a logical order.
13-26: Verify z-index consistency across components
The overlay uses z-50. Let's ensure this follows the project's z-index hierarchy.
✅ Verification successful
Z-index usage is consistent with project patterns
The z-index value of 50 for the AlertDialog overlay is consistent with the project's z-index hierarchy:
- Most UI components use z-10 to z-40 for standard layering
- Critical overlays and dropdowns (AlertDialog, Tooltip, DropdownMenu) consistently use z-50
- The overlay's z-50 ensures it appears above other UI elements, which is the expected behavior for modal dialogs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index usage patterns in the codebase
rg "z-\d+" --type tsx --type css
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for z-index patterns in all files, showing context
rg -A 2 "z-\d+" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'css:*.css'
Length of output: 22905
4-5: Verify path aliases and component dependencies
Let's ensure the path aliases and imported components are properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Path aliases and dependencies are correctly configured
The imports are valid as:
- The
@/path alias is properly configured in tsconfig.json - The
cnutility function exists insrc/lib/utils.ts - The
buttonVariantsis exported fromsrc/components/ui/button.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if path aliases are configured in tsconfig
cat tsconfig.json | jq '.compilerOptions.paths'
# Verify button component exists and exports buttonVariants
fd -e tsx -e ts "button\.(tsx|ts)$" src/components/ui
Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if buttonVariants is exported from button.tsx
ast-grep --pattern 'export const buttonVariants'
# Check if cn utility exists in utils
fd -e ts -e tsx "utils\.(tsx|ts)$" src/lib
Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of utils.ts for cn function
cat src/lib/utils.ts
# Check content of button.tsx for buttonVariants
cat src/components/ui/button.tsx
Length of output: 2629
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[failure] 4-4:
Insert ⏎
99-125: Verify button variant consistency
The components use buttonVariants from the shared button component. Let's ensure consistent usage across the application.
✅ Verification successful
Button variant usage is consistent with design system
The implementation is correct and follows the established pattern:
AlertDialogActionuses default variant which provides primary action stylingAlertDialogCanceluses outline variant which is appropriate for secondary/cancel actions- This matches the usage in
PlugConfigEdit.tsxwhere these components are used in a confirmation dialog
The button variants are well-defined in the shared button component with clear semantic purposes, and the alert dialog components use them appropriately for their respective roles.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for buttonVariants usage patterns
rg "buttonVariants\(" --type tsx
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for buttonVariants usage in all files
rg "buttonVariants\("
# Also search for potential button component definitions
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = {
$$$
variants: $$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 388
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the button component implementation to understand the variants
cat src/components/ui/button.tsx
# Also check for any other alert dialog usages
rg "AlertDialog" --type-list
rg "AlertDialog" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
Length of output: 8781
src/pages/Apps/PlugConfigEdit.tsx (1)
31-50:
Add error handling and data validation
The component needs better error handling and data validation:
- No error handling for JSON.stringify in useEffect
- No validation of the existingConfig structure
- No error state management for failed data fetching
Consider applying these improvements:
useEffect(() => {
- if (existingConfig) {
+ if (!existingConfig) return;
+
+ try {
setConfig({
slug: existingConfig.slug,
meta: JSON.stringify(existingConfig.meta, null, 2),
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error parsing configuration:', error);
+ // Consider showing an error message to the user
+ setConfig({
+ slug: existingConfig.slug,
+ meta: '{}',
+ });
}
}, [existingConfig]);Let's verify the shape of the API response:
src/Routers/AppRouter.tsx (3)
7-7: LGTM: Import changes align with architectural improvements
The new imports enhance error handling capabilities and introduce plug configuration management, supporting the microfrontends architecture.
Also applies to: 14-14, 31-32
88-88: LGTM: Improved error handling for undefined routes
Good defensive programming practice to show an error page instead of a blank screen when routes return null/undefined.
171-175: Verify internationalization for the error message
The ErrorBoundary implementation is good, but let's ensure the "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" message is properly internationalized.
Additionally, consider adding error reporting to track these boundary errors:
<ErrorBoundary
fallback={<ErrorPage forError="PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" />}
+ onError={(error, errorInfo) => {
+ // Add error reporting here
+ console.error('Page load error:', error, errorInfo);
+ }}
>✅ Verification successful
Error message is properly internationalized
The error message is correctly internationalized:
- The
PAGE_LOAD_ERRORconstant maps to translation keyspage_load_errorandcould_not_load_page - These translations are present in the locale files (confirmed in en.json)
- The ErrorPage component correctly uses the translation function
t()to display the messages
The suggestion for error reporting can still be valuable, but the internationalization concern is addressed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if PAGE_LOAD_ERROR exists in translation files
echo "Checking for PAGE_LOAD_ERROR in translation files..."
rg -g '*.json' "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" public/locale/
Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the locale directory exists and its structure
fd --type directory "locale"
# Check for any error-related translations in JSON files
fd -e json . | xargs cat 2>/dev/null | grep -i "error"
# Let's also check the ErrorPage component to understand how it handles the error prop
ast-grep --pattern 'const ErrorPage = $_' -l typescript,typescriptreact
Length of output: 31161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for translation files and error page component
fd -e json . public/locale src/locale
# Look for ErrorPage component definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const ErrorPage = $_'
# Also check for PAGE_LOAD_ERROR string in all files
rg "PAGE_LOAD_ERROR" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1329
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the translation files for page_load_error
cat public/locale/en.json | grep -A 1 -B 1 "page_load_error"
# Also check DefaultErrorPage component's usage of translations
rg "t\([\"']page_load_error[\"']\)" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 616
package.json (2)
59-59: Verify Module Federation plugin configuration.
The @originjs/vite-plugin-federation addition aligns with the microfrontend objectives. However, ensure proper configuration in vite.config.mts.
✅ Verification successful
Module Federation plugin is properly configured and up-to-date
The verification shows that:
- The plugin is properly configured in
vite.config.mtswith remote module setup forcare_livekit - Version 1.3.6 is currently the latest stable version available on npm
- The configuration follows the recommended structure with name, remotes, and shared options
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Module Federation configuration and latest version
# Check if vite.config.mts exists and contains federation plugin config
echo "Checking vite.config.mts for federation plugin configuration..."
rg -A 10 "federation"
# Check latest version
echo "Checking latest version of @originjs/vite-plugin-federation..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@originjs/vite-plugin-federation | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest'
Length of output: 4744
62-65:
Standardize Radix UI package versions.
The Radix UI packages are using different major versions:
react-alert-dialog: v1.1.2react-label: v2.1.0
This version mismatch could lead to compatibility issues. Consider standardizing all Radix UI packages to the same major version.
src/components/Common/Sidebar/Sidebar.tsx (1)
67-67: Verify the new navigation item's dependencies.
The new "app_settings" navigation item needs verification of its dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the router configuration since the previous search didn't find the route.
Let me try one more search with corrected file type flags and broader route patterns:
Let me check the router files directly:
Based on the router files content, I can now provide the final response:
The new navigation item's dependencies are properly configured
The verification shows:
- Route
/appsexists in AppRouter.tsx and is handled by thePlugConfigListcomponent - Icon
l-settingexists in CAREUI/icons/UniconPaths.json - Translation key
app_settingsis used in the sidebar, but the translation files location couldn't be verified. However, this is likely due to the translations being in a different location or managed externally.
The route is properly configured in the main application router, making this navigation item functional from a routing perspective.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the route, translation key, and icon for the new navigation item.
# Test 1: Verify the route exists in AppRouter
echo "Checking for /apps route..."
rg -A 5 "path: \"/apps\"" src/Routers/
# Test 2: Verify the translation key exists
echo "Checking for app_settings translation key..."
rg "app_settings" public/locales/
# Test 3: Verify the icon exists
echo "Checking for l-setting icon..."
rg "l-setting" src/CAREUI/icons/
Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any route definition related to apps or settings
echo "Checking for apps route definitions..."
rg -l "path.*apps" --type ts
# Check translation files in different possible locations
echo "Checking for translation files..."
fd "translations|locales|i18n" --type d
# Check for translation key in ts/tsx files
echo "Checking for app_settings usage..."
rg "app_settings" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for route definitions with broader patterns
echo "Checking for route definitions..."
rg -A 5 "path:.*(/apps|/settings)" --type=typescript
# Check for app_settings with correct typescript extension
echo "Checking for app_settings usage..."
rg "app_settings" --type=typescript
# Look for any Router or routes configuration files
echo "Checking for router configuration files..."
fd -e ts -e tsx Router
Length of output: 492
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of router files
echo "Content of AppRouter.tsx:"
cat src/Routers/AppRouter.tsx
echo -e "\nContent of SessionRouter.tsx:"
cat src/Routers/SessionRouter.tsx
# Try searching with file extension
echo -e "\nSearching for route definitions:"
rg -A 5 "path.*(/apps|/settings)" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts"
Length of output: 6925
src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx (1)
9-9: LGTM: Import change aligns with error handling refactoring
The change to import ErrorPage follows the project's conventions and supports the transition to a more generic error handling approach.
src/Utils/request/api.tsx (1)
93-93: Verify the PlugConfig type implementation
Let's ensure the PlugConfig type is properly defined and matches the API contract.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the PlugConfig interface definition.
PlugConfig type is properly defined and consistently used
The PlugConfig interface is correctly defined in src/types/plugConfig.ts with a simple structure containing slug and meta fields. It's consistently imported and used across the codebase in related components (PlugConfigList, PlugConfigEdit) and API routes. No inconsistencies or issues were found in its implementation or usage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the PlugConfig type definition and its usage
# Find the PlugConfig type definition
echo "Looking for PlugConfig type definition:"
rg -p "type.*PlugConfig.*=.*{" --type ts
# Find all usages of PlugConfig
echo -e "\nChecking PlugConfig usages:"
rg "PlugConfig" --type ts
Length of output: 2199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the PlugConfig interface
echo "PlugConfig interface definition:"
cat src/types/plugConfig.ts
# Check if there are any other interfaces extending or types using PlugConfig
echo -e "\nRelated types and interfaces:"
rg -p "extends.*PlugConfig|implements.*PlugConfig" --type ts
Length of output: 319
src/components/Patient/PatientRegister.tsx (2)
Line range hint 831-1000: Form validation implementation is robust and well-structured.
The validation logic properly handles:
- Required fields validation
- Insurance details validation
- Age/DOB validation
- Phone number validation
- Medical history validation
Line range hint 1-1200: Overall implementation follows React best practices and provides excellent UX.
The component demonstrates:
- Clean and maintainable structure
- Proper form field organization
- Comprehensive validation
- Good error handling
- Appropriate loading states
- Clear user feedback
vite.config.mts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Importing the federation plugin
The @originjs/vite-plugin-federation import is correctly added.
243-246: Verify browser compatibility with 'esnext' target and disabled module preload polyfills
Setting the build target to 'esnext' and disabling module preload polyfills may cause compatibility issues with older browsers that do not support the latest ECMAScript features or module preloading.
build: {
target: "esnext",
modulePreload: {
polyfill: false,
},
},Please verify that your application's target browsers support these features, or consider specifying a lower target (e.g., 'es2017') and enabling polyfills to maintain broader compatibility.
Run the following script to check the project's browserslist configuration and ensure compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the project's dependencies and build configuration to better assess the compatibility requirements.
Browser compatibility concerns are valid but manageable with current configuration
The project's browserslist configuration already ensures good browser compatibility:
- Production targets
>0.2%, not dead, not op_mini all, which covers modern browsers while excluding obsolete ones - Development targets latest Chrome, Firefox, and Safari versions
- The project uses Vite with PostCSS and autoprefixer, which will handle necessary polyfills and transformations
Additionally:
- The project uses modern dependencies and TypeScript with
ESNexttarget - BrowserStack testing is part of the workflow, ensuring cross-browser compatibility
@vitejs/plugin-react-swcand other build tools will handle necessary transformations
While using esnext target and disabling module preload polyfills is aggressive, the browserslist configuration will ensure the final bundle is compatible with the target browsers. The build tools will handle the necessary transformations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Display the browserslist configuration to verify target browsers.
# Test: Output browserslist configurations if they exist.
if [ -f browserslist ] || [ -f .browserslistrc ] || [ -f package.json ]; then
echo "Browserslist configuration found:"
cat browserslist .browserslistrc 2>/dev/null
jq '.browserslist' package.json 2>/dev/null
else
echo "No browserslist configuration found."
fi
Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for dependencies and build configuration
echo "Package.json contents:"
jq '{dependencies, devDependencies, engines}' package.json
# Look for any TypeScript configuration that might affect compilation targets
echo -e "\nTypeScript configuration:"
fd -e json -e jsonc tsconfig && cat tsconfig.json tsconfig.*.json 2>/dev/null
# Search for any explicit browser support documentation
echo -e "\nSearching for browser support documentation:"
rg -i "browser.*support|compatibility" README.md docs/ 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 5033
| export interface PlugConfig { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| meta: Record<string, any>; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and add documentation
The interface needs better type safety and documentation for maintainability:
- The
metaproperty usingRecord<string, any>reduces type safety. Consider defining a more specific type structure for plugin metadata. - Missing JSDoc documentation explaining the interface's purpose and usage.
Consider applying these improvements:
+/**
+ * Configuration interface for microfrontend plugins
+ * @property slug - Unique identifier for the plugin
+ * @property meta - Plugin-specific configuration metadata
+ */
export interface PlugConfig {
slug: string;
- meta: Record<string, any>;
+ meta: {
+ name?: string;
+ version?: string;
+ entry?: string;
+ dependencies?: Record<string, string>;
+ [key: string]: unknown;
+ };
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface PlugConfig { | |
| slug: string; | |
| meta: Record<string, any>; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Configuration interface for microfrontend plugins | |
| * @property slug - Unique identifier for the plugin | |
| * @property meta - Plugin-specific configuration metadata | |
| */ | |
| export interface PlugConfig { | |
| slug: string; | |
| meta: { | |
| name?: string; | |
| version?: string; | |
| entry?: string; | |
| dependencies?: Record<string, string>; | |
| [key: string]: unknown; | |
| }; | |
| } |
| const Textarea = React.forwardRef<HTMLTextAreaElement, TextareaProps>( | ||
| ({ className, ...props }, ref) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <textarea | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| "flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-gray-200 bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-sm shadow-sm placeholder:text-gray-500 focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-gray-950 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 dark:border-gray-800 dark:placeholder:text-gray-400 dark:focus-visible:ring-gray-300", | ||
| className, | ||
| )} | ||
| ref={ref} | ||
| {...props} | ||
| /> | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility with ARIA attributes
The textarea should be associated with a label for better accessibility. Consider adding aria attributes when no visible label is present.
const Textarea = React.forwardRef<HTMLTextAreaElement, TextareaProps>(
({ className, ...props }, ref) => {
return (
<textarea
+ aria-label={props['aria-label'] || 'Text input field'}
className={cn(
"flex min-h-[60px] w-full rounded-md border border-gray-200 bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-sm shadow-sm placeholder:text-gray-500 focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-1 focus-visible:ring-gray-950 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 dark:border-gray-800 dark:placeholder:text-gray-400 dark:focus-visible:ring-gray-300",
className,
)}
ref={ref}
{...props}
/>
);
},
);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| {/* <Routers.AppRouter /> */} | ||
| <div>Hello</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Core routing functionality is disabled
The current changes completely disable the application's routing system by commenting out <Routers.AppRouter /> and replacing it with static content. While experimenting with microfrontends is valuable, breaking core navigation significantly impacts the application's usability.
Consider:
- Implementing the microfrontend changes incrementally without disabling existing functionality
- Using feature flags to toggle between old and new implementations
- Creating a separate route for the microfrontend experiment
- {/* <Routers.AppRouter /> */}
- <div>Hello</div>
+ <Routers.AppRouter />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {/* <Routers.AppRouter /> */} | |
| <div>Hello</div> | |
| <Routers.AppRouter /> |
| <Table> | ||
| <TableHeader> | ||
| <TableRow> | ||
| <TableHead>Slug</TableHead> | ||
| <TableHead>Actions</TableHead> | ||
| </TableRow> | ||
| </TableHeader> | ||
| <TableBody> | ||
| {data?.configs?.map((config: PlugConfig) => ( | ||
| <TableRow key={config.slug}> | ||
| <TableCell>{config.slug}</TableCell> | ||
| <TableCell> | ||
| <Button | ||
| variant="ghost" | ||
| onClick={() => navigate(`/apps/plug-configs/${config.slug}`)} | ||
| > | ||
| <CareIcon icon="l-pen" /> | ||
| </Button> | ||
| </TableCell> | ||
| </TableRow> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </TableBody> | ||
| </Table> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add empty state handling and pagination support.
The table implementation needs several improvements:
- Missing empty state handling when no configurations exist
- No pagination for large datasets
- Table accessibility can be improved
Consider implementing these improvements:
- <Table>
+ <Table aria-labelledby="plug-configs-title">
<TableHeader>
<TableRow>
- <TableHead>Slug</TableHead>
- <TableHead>Actions</TableHead>
+ <TableHead scope="col">Slug</TableHead>
+ <TableHead scope="col">Actions</TableHead>
</TableRow>
</TableHeader>
<TableBody>
+ {(!data?.configs || data.configs.length === 0) && (
+ <TableRow>
+ <TableCell colSpan={2} className="text-center py-8">
+ No configurations found. Click "Add New Config" to create one.
+ </TableCell>
+ </TableRow>
+ )}
{data?.configs?.map((config: PlugConfig) => (Also, consider implementing pagination:
interface PaginatedResponse extends PlugConfigResponse {
total: number;
page: number;
perPage: number;
}| export function PlugConfigList() { | ||
| const { data, loading } = useQuery(routes.plugConfig.listPlugConfigs); | ||
|
|
||
| if (loading) { | ||
| return <Loading />; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and type safety improvements.
The current implementation lacks error handling and type safety:
- No error state handling for failed API requests
- Missing type definition for the API response
- No error boundaries for graceful failure handling
Consider implementing these improvements:
+interface PlugConfigResponse {
+ configs: PlugConfig[];
+}
+
export function PlugConfigList() {
- const { data, loading } = useQuery(routes.plugConfig.listPlugConfigs);
+ const { data, loading, error } = useQuery<PlugConfigResponse>(routes.plugConfig.listPlugConfigs);
if (loading) {
return <Loading />;
}
+
+ if (error) {
+ return (
+ <div className="p-4 text-red-500">
+ Error loading configurations: {error.message}
+ </div>
+ );
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| // Provide React and ReactDOM to the plugin | ||
| (window as any).React = React; | ||
| (window as any).ReactDOM = ReactDOM; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid Polluting the Global Namespace with React and ReactDOM
Assigning React and ReactDOM to the global window object can lead to conflicts and unintended side effects, especially if different versions are loaded or plugins manipulate these globals. Consider providing React and ReactDOM to plugins via module imports or dependency injection to avoid global namespace pollution.
| private loadScript(url: string): Promise<void> { | ||
| return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | ||
| const script = document.createElement("script"); | ||
| script.src = url; | ||
| script.onload = () => resolve(); | ||
| script.onerror = () => reject(new Error(`Failed to load script: ${url}`)); | ||
| document.head.appendChild(script); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Concern: Dynamic Loading of External Scripts
The loadScript method dynamically loads external scripts from URLs without validation or sanitization. This can expose the application to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or execution of malicious code if the URLs are not from trusted sources. Ensure that only trusted and validated URLs are used, consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers, and use Subresource Integrity (SRI) to mitigate security risks.
| const pluginModule = (window as any)[config.name]; | ||
| if (!pluginModule) { | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| `Plugin ${config.name} not found after loading script`, | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure Reliable Access to Plugin Modules
Accessing the plugin module via (window as any)[config.name] assumes that the plugin script attaches itself to the global window object under the specified name, which may not be reliable and undermines type safety. Consider enforcing a consistent plugin export pattern or using a module loader system to handle plugin modules more robustly.
| const plugin: Plugin = { | ||
| ...pluginModule, | ||
| routes: config.routes.map((route) => { | ||
| const component = pluginModule[route.component]; | ||
| if (!component) { | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| `Component ${route.component} not found in plugin ${config.name}`, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| return { | ||
| ...route, | ||
| component, | ||
| }; | ||
| }), | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validate External Plugin Modules Before Usage
pluginModule comes from an external script and may not conform to the expected structure. Spreading ...pluginModule without validation can introduce unexpected behavior or security risks. Validate the structure and types of pluginModule before using it to ensure it meets the Plugin interface requirements.
vite.config.mts
Outdated
| federation({ | ||
| name: "host", | ||
| remotes: { | ||
| care_livekit: { | ||
| external: | ||
| "http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", | ||
| format: "esm", | ||
| from: "vite", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| shared: { | ||
| react: { | ||
| singleton: true, | ||
| eager: true, | ||
| requiredVersion: "^18.0.0", | ||
| }, | ||
| "react-dom": { | ||
| singleton: true, | ||
| eager: true, | ||
| requiredVersion: "^18.0.0", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Update 'external' URL to use HTTPS instead of HTTP
The external URL for the care_livekit remote is set to use HTTP:
external:
"http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",Using an HTTP URL can lead to mixed content issues and security warnings when your application is served over HTTPS. It is recommended to use HTTPS to ensure secure connections and avoid potential problems:
- external:
- "http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",
+ external:
+ "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
vite.config.mts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
vite.config.mts (2)
108-118: Verify remote module availability and integration
The federation plugin is configured as a host application that depends on a remote module from care_livekit_fe. Please ensure:
- The remote module is deployed and accessible
- The remote entry point version is pinned for stability
Consider implementing a fallback mechanism in case the remote module fails to load, to ensure graceful degradation of functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual imports and integration points to ensure proper usage of the remote module.
Remote module integration looks correct and module is accessible
The verification shows that:
- The remote module is deployed and accessible (HTTP 200 response)
- Type declarations are properly set up
- The module is correctly imported using React.lazy() for code splitting
- The integration follows Module Federation best practices
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if remote entry point is accessible and returns valid JavaScript
curl -I "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js"
# Search for any imports of the remote module to verify integration
rg -l "care_livekit/CareLivekit"
Length of output: 1196
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the TypeScript declaration file
cat src/types/care_livekit.d.ts
# Check how the module is imported and used in PluginEngine
rg -A 5 "care_livekit" src/PluginEngine.tsx
Length of output: 355
2-2: Verify federation plugin version
The federation plugin is crucial for microfrontend architecture. Let's ensure we're using the latest stable version.
✅ Verification successful
Federation plugin version is up to date
The project is using @originjs/vite-plugin-federation@^1.3.6 which matches the latest stable version (1.3.6) from npm registry. The version specification with the caret (^) will allow for compatible updates within the same major version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the latest version of @originjs/vite-plugin-federation
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@originjs/vite-plugin-federation/latest | jq '.version'
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the package.json for the currently used version
rg -U "@originjs/vite-plugin-federation.*version|\"@originjs/vite-plugin-federation\".*\n.*version" package.json
Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Try a different approach to find the version in package.json
rg -A 1 "@originjs/vite-plugin-federation" package.json
Length of output: 136
| @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ function getPluginDependencies(): string[] { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| /** @type {import('vite').UserConfig} */ | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Configure shared dependencies for module federation
The current federation setup lacks explicit shared dependencies configuration, which is crucial for:
- Preventing duplicate dependencies
- Ensuring version compatibility between host and remote
- Optimizing bundle sizes
Add shared dependencies configuration to the federation plugin:
federation({
name: "host",
remotes: {
care_livekit: {
external: "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",
format: "esm",
from: "vite",
},
},
+ shared: {
+ react: { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' },
+ 'react-dom': { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' }
+ }
}),Also applies to: 108-118
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/install-platform-deps.ts (2)
4-5: Add type annotations for platform and architecture variables.For better type safety and code clarity, consider adding explicit type annotations:
-const platform = os.platform(); -const arch = os.arch(); +const platform: NodeJS.Platform = os.platform(); +const arch: string = os.arch();
18-18: Add logging for unsupported platforms.While the code safely handles unsupported platforms, it silently continues without any warning. This might make troubleshooting difficult.
+if (!deps[platform]) { + console.warn(`Warning: Unsupported platform "${platform}". Supported platforms are: ${Object.keys(deps).join(', ')}`); +} else if (!deps[platform][arch]) { + console.warn(`Warning: Unsupported architecture "${arch}" for platform "${platform}". Supported architectures are: ${Object.keys(deps[platform]).join(', ')}`); +} const platformDeps = deps[platform]?.[arch] || [];vite.config.mts (1)
Line range hint
240-261: Improve chunk naming logic and add error handlingThe current chunk naming logic could produce invalid chunk names from file paths and lacks error handling for edge cases.
Apply these improvements:
manualChunks: (id, { getModuleInfo }) => { if (id.includes("node_modules")) { const moduleInfo = getModuleInfo(id); // Determine if the module should be in the 'vendor' chunk const manualVendorChunks = /tiny-invariant/; if ( manualVendorChunks.test(id) || - isStaticallyImportedByEntry(id) + isStaticallyImportedByEntry(id, getModuleInfo) ) { return "vendor"; } else { // group lazy-loaded dependencies by their dynamic importer const dynamicImporters = moduleInfo?.dynamicImporters || []; if (dynamicImporters && dynamicImporters.length > 0) { // Use the first dynamic importer to name the chunk - const importerChunkName = dynamicImporters[0] - ? dynamicImporters[0].split("/").pop() - : "vendor".split(".")[0]; + const importerPath = dynamicImporters[0]; + if (!importerPath) return "vendor"; + // Sanitize the chunk name to ensure it's valid + const sanitizedName = importerPath + .split("/") + .pop() + ?.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9-_]/g, "_") || "vendor"; + return `chunk-${sanitizedName}`; } // If no dynamic importers are found, let Rollup handle it automatically } } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
package.json(2 hunks)scripts/install-platform-deps.ts(1 hunks)vite.config.mts(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/install-platform-deps.ts (1)
1-32: Verify integration with build process and CI/CD pipeline.
Please ensure this script is properly integrated:
✅ Verification successful
Script is properly integrated and no conflicts found
The script is correctly integrated into the build process through the postinstall npm script in package.json, which automatically executes after npm install. No conflicting scripts were found, and it's the only platform-specific dependency installer in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the script is referenced in package.json scripts
echo "Checking package.json integration..."
jq '.scripts | keys[] | select(. | contains("install"))' package.json
# Check if there are any similar scripts that might conflict
echo "Checking for potential conflicts..."
fd -e js -e ts -e sh install
Length of output: 345
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of package.json scripts to see how install-platform-deps.ts is used
echo "Checking package.json scripts content..."
jq '.scripts' package.json
# Check if this script is referenced in any workflow files
echo "Checking GitHub workflow files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows --exec cat {}
Length of output: 31400
| if (platformDeps.length > 0) { | ||
| console.log( | ||
| `Installing platform-specific dependencies for ${platform}-${arch}`, | ||
| ); | ||
| try { | ||
| execSync(`npm install --no-save ${platformDeps.join(" ")}`, { | ||
| stdio: "inherit", | ||
| }); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Failed to install platform-specific dependencies:", error); | ||
| process.exit(1); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance security and robustness of the installation process.
The current implementation could benefit from additional safety measures:
- Validate dependency names to prevent command injection
- Add timeout to prevent hanging installations
- Use more specific error handling
if (platformDeps.length > 0) {
+ // Validate dependency names
+ if (!platformDeps.every(dep => /^@rollup\/rollup-[a-zA-Z0-9-]+$/.test(dep))) {
+ console.error("Invalid dependency name detected");
+ process.exit(1);
+ }
+
console.log(
`Installing platform-specific dependencies for ${platform}-${arch}`,
);
try {
- execSync(`npm install --no-save ${platformDeps.join(" ")}`, {
+ execSync(`npm install --no-save --no-audit --no-fund ${platformDeps.join(" ")}`, {
stdio: "inherit",
+ timeout: 60000, // 1 minute timeout
});
} catch (error) {
- console.error("Failed to install platform-specific dependencies:", error);
+ if (error instanceof Error) {
+ console.error("Failed to install platform-specific dependencies:", error.message);
+ if ('code' in error && error.code === 'ETIMEDOUT') {
+ console.error("Installation timed out. Please check your network connection.");
+ }
+ }
process.exit(1);
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (platformDeps.length > 0) { | |
| console.log( | |
| `Installing platform-specific dependencies for ${platform}-${arch}`, | |
| ); | |
| try { | |
| execSync(`npm install --no-save ${platformDeps.join(" ")}`, { | |
| stdio: "inherit", | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Failed to install platform-specific dependencies:", error); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (platformDeps.length > 0) { | |
| // Validate dependency names | |
| if (!platformDeps.every(dep => /^@rollup\/rollup-[a-zA-Z0-9-]+$/.test(dep))) { | |
| console.error("Invalid dependency name detected"); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } | |
| console.log( | |
| `Installing platform-specific dependencies for ${platform}-${arch}`, | |
| ); | |
| try { | |
| execSync(`npm install --no-save --no-audit --no-fund ${platformDeps.join(" ")}`, { | |
| stdio: "inherit", | |
| timeout: 60000, // 1 minute timeout | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| if (error instanceof Error) { | |
| console.error("Failed to install platform-specific dependencies:", error.message); | |
| if ('code' in error && error.code === 'ETIMEDOUT') { | |
| console.error("Installation timed out. Please check your network connection."); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } | |
| } |
| const deps: Record<string, Record<string, string[]>> = { | ||
| darwin: { | ||
| arm64: ["@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64"], | ||
| x64: ["@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64"], | ||
| }, | ||
| linux: { | ||
| arm64: ["@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu"], | ||
| x64: ["@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu"], | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Windows platform support is missing but required
The package-lock.json shows that Windows-specific Rollup dependencies (@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc, @rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc, @rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc) are present in the project's dependencies, but the platform installation script doesn't handle Windows platform. This means Windows users won't get the required platform-specific dependencies installed.
scripts/install-platform-deps.ts: Add Windows platform support to ensure Windows users get the correct dependencies installed.
The suggested improvements in the review comment are valid and necessary to fix this issue.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider enhancing platform support and type safety.
The current implementation has several limitations:
- Windows platform is not supported
- Only arm64 and x64 architectures are covered
- Type definition could be more specific
Consider these improvements:
+type SupportedPlatform = 'darwin' | 'linux' | 'win32';
+type SupportedArch = 'arm64' | 'x64';
+
-const deps: Record<string, Record<string, string[]>> = {
+const deps: Record<SupportedPlatform, Partial<Record<SupportedArch, string[]>>> = {
darwin: {
arm64: ["@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64"],
x64: ["@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64"],
},
linux: {
arm64: ["@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu"],
x64: ["@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu"],
},
+ win32: {
+ x64: ["@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc"],
+ },
};Let's verify if Windows users are affected:
Let me gather more information about the platform support in the codebase.
Let me check the package-lock.json to verify if Windows dependencies are actually present.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are Windows users in recent commits
git log --format="%ae" | grep -i "windows" || git log --format="%ae" | grep -i "microsoft"
Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for rollup dependencies in package.json files
rg -l "rollup.*win32" --type json
# Check for platform-specific code or conditions
rg -l "process\.platform.*win32|win32.*process\.platform"
# Look for any Windows-related configuration or setup
rg -l "windows|win32" --type typescript --type javascript
# Check if the install script is being used
fd "install.*\.(js|ts)$" -x cat {}
Length of output: 1044
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Extract Windows-related rollup dependencies from package-lock.json
rg "@rollup/rollup-win32" -A 5 -B 5 package-lock.json
Length of output: 1947
vite.config.mts
Outdated
| external: | ||
| "http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Update remote entry URL to use HTTPS
Using HTTP for the remote entry URL can lead to mixed content issues and security warnings in production. This is particularly important for microfrontend architecture where secure communication between modules is crucial.
Apply this fix:
- external:
- "http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",
+ external:
+ "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| external: | |
| "http://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", | |
| external: | |
| "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", |
vite.config.mts
Outdated
| function isStaticallyImportedByEntry(moduleId, visited = new Set()) { | ||
| if (visited.has(moduleId)) return false; | ||
| visited.add(moduleId); | ||
|
|
||
| const modInfo = getModuleInfo(moduleId); | ||
| if (!modInfo) return false; | ||
|
|
||
| // Check if the module is an entry point | ||
| if (modInfo.isEntry) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Check all static importers | ||
| for (const importerId of modInfo.importers) { | ||
| if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, visited)) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential undefined getModuleInfo reference
The function uses getModuleInfo before it's defined, which could cause runtime errors. This function is only available within the manualChunks context.
Apply this fix:
-function isStaticallyImportedByEntry(moduleId, visited = new Set()) {
+function isStaticallyImportedByEntry(moduleId, getModuleInfo, visited = new Set()) {
if (visited.has(moduleId)) return false;
visited.add(moduleId);
const modInfo = getModuleInfo(moduleId);
if (!modInfo) return false;
if (modInfo.isEntry) {
return true;
}
for (const importerId of modInfo.importers) {
- if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, visited)) {
+ if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, getModuleInfo, visited)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function isStaticallyImportedByEntry(moduleId, visited = new Set()) { | |
| if (visited.has(moduleId)) return false; | |
| visited.add(moduleId); | |
| const modInfo = getModuleInfo(moduleId); | |
| if (!modInfo) return false; | |
| // Check if the module is an entry point | |
| if (modInfo.isEntry) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // Check all static importers | |
| for (const importerId of modInfo.importers) { | |
| if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, visited)) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| function isStaticallyImportedByEntry(moduleId, getModuleInfo, visited = new Set()) { | |
| if (visited.has(moduleId)) return false; | |
| visited.add(moduleId); | |
| const modInfo = getModuleInfo(moduleId); | |
| if (!modInfo) return false; | |
| // Check if the module is an entry point | |
| if (modInfo.isEntry) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // Check all static importers | |
| for (const importerId of modInfo.importers) { | |
| if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, getModuleInfo, visited)) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
vite.config.mts (2)
2-3: Consider build performance impact of removing SWCThe switch from
@vitejs/plugin-react-swcto@vitejs/plugin-reactmight impact build performance. While necessary for federation support, consider monitoring build times and potentially adding build caching solutions if needed.
240-250: Review chunking strategy impact on performanceThe current chunking strategy might create too many small vendor chunks:
- Each node_module gets its own chunk (
vendor-${name})- Only tiny-invariant is bundled into the main vendor chunk
Consider:
- Grouping related packages into shared chunks
- Setting a minimum size threshold for chunk creation
manualChunks(id) { if (id.includes("node_modules")) { - if (/tiny-invariant/.test(id)) { + // Group common runtime dependencies + if (/tiny-invariant|react-dom|react-router/.test(id)) { return "vendor"; } const chunks = id.toString().split("node_modules/")[1]; if (chunks) { const [name] = chunks.split("/"); + // Only create separate chunks for larger dependencies + const stats = fs.statSync(id); + if (stats.size > 50000) { // 50KB threshold return `vendor-${name}`; + } + return "vendor-common"; // Group smaller dependencies } } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
netlify.toml(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)vite.config.mts(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (6)
netlify.toml (3)
2-2: LGTM: Valid publish directory format
The removal of the trailing slash from the publish directory path is a valid change as both formats are acceptable to Netlify.
6-6:
Reconsider using Node.js 22.11.0
Node.js 22.x is currently not an LTS version and is in the Current/Unstable release line. This could introduce stability issues in the production environment.
Consider using the latest LTS version (20.x) instead to ensure stability and long-term support.
Let's verify the project's compatibility with Node.js 22:
7-7: Verify the impact of removing --legacy-peer-deps
The change from --legacy-peer-deps to --no-optional represents a significant shift in dependency resolution strategy:
- Removing
--legacy-peer-depsmeans stricter peer dependency checking - Adding
--no-optionalwill skip optional dependencies
This could potentially break the build if there are:
- Unresolved peer dependency conflicts
- Required optional dependencies
Let's analyze the dependency tree for potential issues:
Consider:
- Documenting any known peer dependency conflicts and their resolutions
- Verifying that no critical optional dependencies are being skipped
- Adding a preinstall script to validate dependency compatibility
✅ Verification successful
Removing --legacy-peer-deps is safe with current dependency setup
Based on the analysis:
- The package has well-aligned peer dependencies, primarily around React ecosystem (React 16.8+, 17, 18, 19) and build tools
- No conflicting peer dependency requirements were found
- The optional dependencies are only for platform-specific Rollup builds (@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64 and @rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu)
The switch to --no-optional is appropriate as it will skip the platform-specific optional dependencies without impacting core functionality, while removing --legacy-peer-deps is safe due to compatible peer dependency ranges across the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for peer dependency conflicts and optional dependencies
# Check for peer dependency warnings in package.json
echo "Checking for peer dependencies..."
jq '.peerDependencies // {}' package.json
# Look for optional dependencies that might be needed
echo "Checking for optional dependencies..."
jq '.optionalDependencies // {}' package.json
# Search for peer dependency declarations in node_modules
echo "Searching for peer dependency declarations in dependencies..."
fd package.json -t f -d 2 node_modules -x jq 'select(.peerDependencies != null) | {name: .name, peers: .peerDependencies}'
Length of output: 706
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package-lock.json for peer dependency information and examine the build logs
# First, check if package-lock.json exists and look for peer dependency warnings
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
echo "Checking package-lock.json for peer dependencies..."
jq '.packages | .[] | select(.peerDependencies != null) | {name: .name, peers: .peerDependencies}' package-lock.json
fi
# Check the build configuration and scripts
echo "Checking build configuration..."
cat package.json | jq '.scripts'
# Look for any npm-related configuration files
echo "Checking for .npmrc..."
if [ -f ".npmrc" ]; then
cat .npmrc
fi
# Search for build-related files that might reference npm flags
echo "Searching for build-related files..."
rg -l "npm (install|ci)" .
Length of output: 20951
vite.config.mts (3)
88-108: Skipping comment about undefined getModuleInfo
A past review already covers this issue.
131-137: Skipping comments about federation configuration
Past reviews already cover the HTTPS and shared dependencies issues.
234-237: Verify browser compatibility with disabled module preload
The combination of specific browser targets and disabled module preload polyfill needs verification:
- The browser targets look modern but should be validated against your user base
- Disabling module preload polyfill might affect browsers that don't support it natively
✅ Verification successful
Browser targets and module preload configuration are appropriate
The configuration is safe based on the following findings:
- The browserslist configuration in package.json targets modern browsers (>0.2%, not dead)
- The specified browser targets in vite.config.mts (chrome87+, edge88+, firefox78+, safari14+) align with the browserslist config
- Module preload is well-supported in these target browsers natively, making the polyfill unnecessary
- The project uses a browser detection mechanism (browserslist-useragent-regexp) to ensure compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check browser usage statistics in your analytics
curl -s "https://plausible.10bedicu.in/api/v1/stats/browsers?site_id=care.ohc.network" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PLAUSIBLE_API_KEY" | jq '.[]'
Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json and any browserslist config to understand the browser support requirements
fd "package.json|.browserslistrc" --type f --exec cat {}
# Also check for any browser-specific polyfills or related dependencies
rg -i "browserslist|polyfill" package.json
Length of output: 6328
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any module preload related code or configurations
rg -i "modulepreload|preload" --type ts --type js --type json -A 3
# Check for any browser support related scripts
fd "supported-browsers" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 5274
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
vite.config.mts (2)
Line range hint
208-223: Fix potential memory leak in recursive functionThe
isStaticallyImportedByEntryfunction shares thevisitedSet across all recursive calls. This could lead to memory leaks in large codebases. Additionally,getModuleInfoshould be passed explicitly to the recursive function.Apply this fix:
function isStaticallyImportedByEntry( moduleId, + getModuleInfo, visited = new Set(), ) { if (visited.has(moduleId)) return false; visited.add(moduleId); const modInfo = getModuleInfo(moduleId); if (!modInfo) return false; // Check if the module is an entry point if (modInfo.isEntry) { return true; } // Check all static importers for (const importerId of modInfo.importers) { - if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, visited)) { + if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, getModuleInfo, visited)) { return true; } } return false; }
Line range hint
235-251: Improve chunk naming strategyThe current chunk naming strategy uses the first dynamic importer's filename, which could lead to:
- Non-deterministic chunk names if the order of dynamic importers changes
- Potential naming conflicts
- Difficulty in tracking chunks back to their source
Consider using a more deterministic approach:
- const importerChunkName = dynamicImporters[0] - ? dynamicImporters[0].split("/").pop() - : "vendor".split(".")[0]; - return `chunk-${importerChunkName}`; + // Create a stable hash from all dynamic importers + const stableChunkName = dynamicImporters + .sort() // Sort for deterministic order + .map(imp => imp.split("/").pop()) + .join("_") + .replace(/\.[^/.]+$/, ""); // Remove file extension + return `chunk-${stableChunkName}`;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json(1 hunks)vite.config.mts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
vite.config.mts
Outdated
| care_livekit: | ||
| "http://ohcnetwrok.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Fix typo in remote entry URL domain name
There's a typo in the domain name that will cause the remote entry to fail:
- care_livekit:
- "http://ohcnetwrok.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",
+ care_livekit:
+ "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",Note that this change also fixes the HTTP to HTTPS issue mentioned in previous comments.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| care_livekit: | |
| "http://ohcnetwrok.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", | |
| care_livekit: | |
| "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
package.json (1)
158-161: Consider using version range for optional dependenciesThe Rollup Linux packages are pinned to exact version 4.13.0. Consider using a version range (e.g.,
^4.13.0) to allow for minor updates and patches, consistent with other dependencies in the project."optionalDependencies": { - "@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu": "4.13.0", - "@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu": "4.13.0" + "@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu": "^4.13.0", + "@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu": "^4.13.0" }vite.config.mts (2)
Line range hint
200-250: Optimize manual chunks implementationThe current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- The recursive function
isStaticallyImportedByEntryneeds to handle thegetModuleInfoparameter correctly- Consider adding a depth limit to prevent stack overflow
- The chunking strategy could be more granular
Apply these improvements:
manualChunks(id, { getModuleInfo }) { if (id.includes("node_modules")) { const moduleInfo = getModuleInfo(id); // Recursive function to check if the module is statically imported by an entry point function isStaticallyImportedByEntry( moduleId, - visited = new Set(), + visited = new Set(), + depth = 0, ) { + // Prevent deep recursion + if (depth > 100) return false; if (visited.has(moduleId)) return false; visited.add(moduleId); const modInfo = getModuleInfo(moduleId); if (!modInfo) return false; if (modInfo.isEntry) { return true; } for (const importerId of modInfo.importers) { - if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, visited)) { + if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(importerId, visited, depth + 1)) { return true; } } return false; } // Improve chunking strategy with more specific patterns const vendorPatterns = { react: /[\\/]node_modules[\\/](react|react-dom)[\\/]/, utils: /[\\/]node_modules[\\/](tiny-invariant|lodash)[\\/]/, // Add more patterns as needed }; // Check for specific vendor chunks first for (const [key, pattern] of Object.entries(vendorPatterns)) { if (pattern.test(id)) { return `vendor-${key}`; } } if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(id)) { return "vendor"; }
107-114: Complete microfrontend architecture setupThe current configuration needs additional setup for a robust microfrontend architecture:
- Add shared dependencies configuration
- Configure dev server proxy for local development
- Add error handling for remote module loading failures
Consider adding these configurations:
federation({ name: "care_livekit", remotes: { care_livekit: "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", }, + shared: { + react: { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' }, + 'react-dom': { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' }, + '@emotion/react': { singleton: true }, + '@emotion/styled': { singleton: true }, + }, }), // Add dev server proxy configuration +server: { + port: 4000, + proxy: { + '/care_livekit': { + target: 'http://localhost:5000', + changeOrigin: true, + rewrite: (path) => path.replace(/^\/care_livekit/, ''), + }, + }, +},Also, implement error boundaries in your React components to handle remote module loading failures gracefully.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json(3 hunks)vite.config.mts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
63-66: LGTM - Radix UI components are well-integrated
The addition of Radix UI components aligns with the existing architecture and previous review comments.
39-39: Verify the new setup process and scripts
The build process has been modified to use a new setup approach. Please ensure:
- The
scripts/setup-care-apps.jsexists and is properly implemented - The
scripts/install-platform-deps.tshandles all required platform-specific dependencies
Also applies to: 41-41
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the install-platform-deps.ts script as well to complete the verification.
Setup scripts are properly implemented and functional
The verification confirms that both required scripts exist and are properly implemented:
setup-care-apps.jshandles the dynamic app setup by:- Reading enabled apps from environment variables
- Cloning/updating apps from GitHub
- Managing app versions with care-package.lock
- Generating the pluginMap.ts for app manifests
install-platform-deps.tscorrectly manages platform-specific Rollup dependencies for both Linux and Darwin (macOS) architectures
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the required setup scripts exist and are executable
fd -t f "setup-care-apps.js|install-platform-deps.ts" scripts/
# Examine the setup script implementation
cat scripts/setup-care-apps.js
Length of output: 4623
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the platform-specific installation script
cat scripts/install-platform-deps.ts
Length of output: 835
| @@ -56,10 +57,13 @@ | |||
| "@googlemaps/typescript-guards": "^2.0.3", | |||
| "@headlessui/react": "^2.2.0", | |||
| "@hello-pangea/dnd": "^17.0.0", | |||
| "@originjs/vite-plugin-federation": "^1.3.6", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Module Federation configuration needs to be enhanced
The current module federation setup only defines a remote module without specifying shared dependencies or exposed modules. This minimal configuration may lead to potential issues:
- The configuration only defines a remote entry point without specifying shared dependencies management
- No exposed modules are defined, which might limit the microfrontend's functionality
- Missing version control for shared dependencies could lead to conflicts
Please enhance the module federation configuration by:
- Adding a
sharedconfiguration to manage common dependencies - Defining specific modules to expose if this is a host application
- Implementing version control strategy for shared dependencies
🔗 Analysis chain
Review microfrontend configuration and integration strategy
The addition of @originjs/vite-plugin-federation indicates a move towards microfrontends. This is a significant architectural change that requires careful consideration:
- Ensure proper module federation configuration in
vite.config.mts - Define clear boundaries between microfrontends
- Consider shared dependencies management
Based on the results, I can see that module federation is configured in vite.config.mts with a specific remote module care_livekit pointing to a GitHub Pages URL. Let me verify the configuration further.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for vite federation config
rg -A 10 "federation[\"'\(]"
# Look for potential shared dependencies across microfrontends
fd "package.json" apps/ -x cat {} | jq '.dependencies'
Length of output: 3232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for exposed modules and shared dependencies in vite config
rg -A 20 "federation\({" vite.config.mts
# Check for any other potential microfrontend-related configurations
rg -l "remoteEntry.js|exposes:|shared:|remotes:"
Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check federation config with fixed regex
rg -A 20 "federation\(" vite.config.mts
# Look for any imports from the remote module
rg -l "import.*from ['\"]care_livekit/"
Length of output: 741
vite.config.mts
Outdated
| federation({ | ||
| name: "care_livekit", | ||
| remotes: { | ||
| care_livekit: | ||
| "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", | ||
| }, | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Configure shared dependencies in Module Federation setup
The remote entry point is accessible, but the federation plugin configuration is missing critical shared dependencies. This could lead to duplicate instances of React and other shared libraries. You need to:
- Add shared configuration for React and ReactDOM to ensure singleton instances:
federation({
name: "care_livekit",
remotes: {
care_livekit: "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js",
},
shared: {
react: { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '18.3.1' },
'react-dom': { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '18.3.1' }
}
})Note: Unable to verify remote app's React version as the package.json is not accessible. Ensure the remote app uses a compatible React version to prevent runtime issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify remote module accessibility and configuration
The federation plugin is configured correctly with HTTPS, but we should verify:
- The remote entry point's accessibility
- The compatibility between host and remote module versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify remote module accessibility and version compatibility
# Check if remote entry is accessible
curl -I https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js
# Check for package.json in both repos to compare React versions
echo "Host package.json:"
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .dependencies["react-dom"]'
echo "Remote package.json (if available):"
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ohcnetwork/care_livekit_fe/main/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .dependencies["react-dom"]'
Length of output: 1487
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any shared dependencies configured in the federation plugin
# and look for React/ReactDOM sharing configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'federation({
$$$
shared: {
$$$
}
$$$
})'
# Also check for any existing federation configurations in the codebase for reference
rg -A 5 "federation\("
Length of output: 380
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
vite.config.mts (2)
87-112: Optimize static import checker for large codebasesThe implementation is correct but could be optimized for memory usage and type safety.
Consider these improvements:
function isStaticallyImportedByEntry( - getModuleInfo: (moduleId: string) => any, + getModuleInfo: (moduleId: string) => { + isEntry: boolean; + importers: readonly string[]; + } | null, moduleId: string, - visited = new Set(), + visited = new Set<string>(), ) { if (visited.has(moduleId)) return false; visited.add(moduleId); const modInfo = getModuleInfo(moduleId); if (!modInfo) return false; + // Clear visited set when reaching an entry point to optimize memory + if (modInfo.isEntry) { + visited.clear(); return true; } - for (const importerId of modInfo.importers) { + // Use some() instead of for...of for early termination + return modInfo.importers.some(importerId => + isStaticallyImportedByEntry(getModuleInfo, importerId, visited) + ); - if (isStaticallyImportedByEntry(getModuleInfo, importerId, visited)) { - return true; - } - } - - return false; }
262-262: Document chunking strategy and improve chunk namingThe current implementation could benefit from clearer documentation and more explicit chunk naming.
Add comments explaining the chunking strategy and improve chunk naming:
if ( manualVendorChunks.test(id) || - isStaticallyImportedByEntry(getModuleInfo, id) + // Group statically imported node_modules in the vendor chunk + // This helps with caching frequently used dependencies + isStaticallyImportedByEntry(getModuleInfo, id) ) { - return "vendor"; + // Use a more specific name for better debugging + return id.includes('tiny-invariant') ? 'vendor-invariant' : 'vendor-static'; }
vite.config.mts
Outdated
| care_livekit: "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js", | ||
| }, | ||
| // Share core components with micro-frontends | ||
| shared: ["@core"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance shared dependencies configuration
The current shared dependencies configuration is too minimal and could lead to duplicate instances of core libraries.
Expand the shared configuration to include core dependencies:
- shared: ["@core"],
+ shared: {
+ react: { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' },
+ 'react-dom': { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' },
+ '@core': { singleton: true },
+ '@careui/components': { singleton: true }
+ },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| shared: ["@core"], | |
| shared: { | |
| react: { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' }, | |
| 'react-dom': { singleton: true, requiredVersion: '^18.0.0' }, | |
| '@core': { singleton: true }, | |
| '@careui/components': { singleton: true } | |
| }, |
| remotes: { | ||
| // care_livekit: | ||
| // "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", | ||
| care_livekit: "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Use HTTPS for remote entry point
Using HTTP for the remote entry point is insecure and could lead to man-in-the-middle attacks in production.
Replace the HTTP URL with HTTPS:
- care_livekit: "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js",
+ care_livekit: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'
+ ? "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js"
+ : "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| care_livekit: "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js", | |
| care_livekit: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' | |
| ? "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js" | |
| : "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
vite.config.mts (2)
87-112: Enhance type safety for getModuleInfo parameterThe function implementation is solid with proper cycle detection, but the type annotation for getModuleInfo could be more specific.
Consider using a more specific type for getModuleInfo:
- getModuleInfo: (moduleId: string) => any, + getModuleInfo: (moduleId: string) => { + isEntry: boolean; + importers: string[]; + } | null,
Line range hint
264-275: Enhance chunk naming strategyThe current chunk naming strategy could be more robust to handle edge cases.
Consider adding sanitization and validation:
- const importerChunkName = dynamicImporters[0] - ? dynamicImporters[0].split("/").pop() - : "vendor".split(".")[0]; + const importerChunkName = dynamicImporters[0] + ? dynamicImporters[0].split("/").pop()?.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9-]/g, '-') || 'vendor' + : 'vendor'; + // Ensure chunk name starts with a letter (webpack requirement) + return `chunk-${importerChunkName.replace(/^[^a-zA-Z]/, 'n')}`;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
vite.config.mts(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
vite.config.mts (1)
2-2: LGTM: Federation plugin import added correctly
The federation plugin import is properly added to support microfrontend architecture.
| // Federation Config for care_livekit_fe | ||
| federation({ | ||
| name: "core", | ||
| // This file exposes shared components to microfrontends | ||
| filename: "sharedCore.js", | ||
| // Expose shared components that microfrontends can use | ||
| exposes: { | ||
| "./components/Common/PageTitle": | ||
| "./src/components/Common/PageTitle.tsx", | ||
| "./components/Common/ErrorBoundary": | ||
| "./src/components/Common/ErrorBoundary.tsx", | ||
| "./Integrations/Plausible": "./src/Integrations/Plausible.tsx", | ||
| "./CAREUI/icons/CareIcon": "./src/CAREUI/icons/CareIcon.tsx", | ||
| "./hooks/useAuthUser": "./src/hooks/useAuthUser.ts", | ||
| "./Utils/request/request": "./src/Utils/request/request.ts", | ||
| // Add other shared components... | ||
| }, | ||
| remotes: { | ||
| // care_livekit: | ||
| // "https://ohcnetwork.github.io/care_livekit_fe/assets/remoteEntry.js", | ||
| care_livekit: "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js", | ||
| }, | ||
| // Share core components with micro-frontends | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add environment-specific remote entry configuration
While using localhost for development is fine, the configuration should be environment-aware.
Consider using environment variables for the remote entry URL:
remotes: {
- care_livekit: "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js",
+ care_livekit: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'
+ ? process.env.REACT_CARE_LIVEKIT_URL
+ : "http://localhost:5173/assets/remoteEntry.js",
},Also, add the new environment variable to your schema:
REACT_CARE_LIVEKIT_URL: z.string().url().optional(),
|
👋 Hi, @gigincg, This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there. |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Documentation