-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-45869: don't set current clients when no OIDC providers are configured #948
base: release-4.18
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…ured by resetting the AuthStatusHandler.currentClientID to an empty string when the Authentication.Spec.Type is not set to OIDC. Additionally, protect against a degraded state when AuthStatusHandler.currentClientID is set but there is no evidence of OIDC providers being configured in the spec by only adding current clients when both the currentClientID is set and there is evidence of OIDC providers being configured. Add a warning log when we notice the currentClientID is set but there is no evidence of OIDC providers being configured. Fixes [OCPBUGS-44953](https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-44953) Signed-off-by: everettraven <[email protected]>
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44953 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45869. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45869, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45869, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45869, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #945
/assign xingxingxia