Added a -progress option to display the progress during elimination #42
Conversation
t-oster
force-pushed
the
feature-progress
branch
5 times, most recently
from
5d964f5 to
0edeedc
Compare
t-oster
force-pushed
the
feature-progress
branch
from
0edeedc to
a28a1c6
Compare
|
This would definitely be a great thing to add. I'm 6 days into a rdfind run (over about 25TB of substantially duplicated old backups) and have no idea if I have one more day or another week. Especially on the final sha1 run. I watch the lsof output to see where it is, but it doesn't have any recognizable pattern - it is hopping around through various top level directories and such. |
|
Running now with this branch. One suggestion - right now it doesn't update the progress until it gets to 1% so you don't know if it is going to show up until it gets there. On a process that takes days, 1% can actually take a while to get to. Could it set '0%' at the beginning or show higher granularity? |
|
Of cause, i could easily go to let's say two places behind the dot. |
…lush after outputting 0%
|
@jasontitus better with 92d3b0d? |
|
@pauldreik I don't want to be rude, but can you estimate when you have time to review? |
|
@jasontitus bump |
Hi,
I like this utility, because it helps to fix my messed up foto library.
However since I have a few ten-thousand files, it takes some time and I miss a progress indicator, so I added one.
In order to not break any existing script it is disabled by default and has to be enabled by the
-progress truecommand line switch.I am not a C++ developer, but I hope it is clean.
Please review and let me know what you think.