Remove faulty IPv6 example #1523
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Does the PR have any schema changes?Looking good! No breaking changes found. |
corymhall
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2024
|
This PR has been shipped in release v3.5.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
The existing IPv6 example is wrong and untested. Creating a working example requires additional changes (like ensuring the nodes can perform
ec2:AssignIpv6Addresses).This removes the faulty and untested example in order to not create frustration and confusion for users. We'll need to separately work on creating a proper IPv6 example (#1522).
Related issues (optional)
Relates to #1522